Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Madras High Court stays GST demand after finding prima facie double taxation in ongoing housing project. *  GST appeal filed before extended deadline can’t be rejected on limitation without considering CBIC relief notification: Gujarat High Court. *  No right to representation against Anti-dumping findings: Delhi High Court *  Wrong service classification alone can’t justify extended limitation without proof of tax evasion: Rajasthan High Court. *  Importer can’t be penalised when exporter’s DFIA licence remained valid, fraud allegations failed: CESTAT. *  Registry can’t decide complex legal issues: GSTAT refers appeal over pre-deposit linked to Amalgamated Entity. *  GST ITC dispute over ERP software must be decided on proof of utilisation, not just bogus supplier allegation: Madras High Court. *  Supreme court stays GST SCN over parallel proceedings during pending statutory appeal *  CESTAT quashes excise duty demand on poultry cage weld mesh. *  Proforma invoice valid for availing CENVAT credit if service tax is paid: CESTAT. *  Commission retained on air tickets bought through GSA/IATA agents not taxable as business auxiliary service. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied on duty-paid inputs from area-based exempt units: CESTAT. *  Gross GST collections surge 15.4% to reach Rs 2.11 lakh crore in July 2026. *  Ghaziabad DGGI | Court Extends Judicial Custody of 2 Accused Involved In GST Fake ITC Fraud of ?31.57 Crore Till 7 August 2026 *  Uploading GST Orders on Portal Alone Is Not Valid Service: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  No liability without proof of prior knowledge of import misdeclaration: CESTAT drops penalties on customs broker orders. *  4-Day hearing notice violated natural justice: Rajasthan High court quashes Ex-parte GST registration cancellation appeal order. *  10% GST penalty pre-deposit rule not applicable where SCN issued before 1st October 2025: Delhi High Court. *  Stock discrepancy alone can’t prove clandestine removal: CESTAT. *  Dept. can’t deny refund for missing challan in its own records: CESTAT. *  GST dept. can’t arbitrarily treat same services as ‘Intermediary’ for one period and ‘Export of Services’ for others: Punjab & Haryana High Court. Orders. *  Manufacturers can’t claim proportionate cess relief for machines installed during the month: Gujarat High Court. *  GST dept. can’t rely on Prospective rule. 88B amendment to ignore existing judicial precedent: Gujarat HC. *  ITC relief denied where supplier fails to deposit tax: Supreme Court upholds validity of sec. 16(2)(c) of CGST Act. *  Redemption fine can’t be ground to reject SVLDRS declaration: Rajasthan High Court *  Whether dept. can invoke sec. 73 without challenging refund sanction order    - Telangana High court stays GST refund recovery. *  GST recovery against genuine buyer before proceeding against defaulting supplier stayed: Karnataka High Court. *  Assessment order uploaded under wrong portal tab: Karnataka High Court restores GST appeal, condones delay *  CBIC plans faceless GST system; refunds, registration and assessments may go digital in phases
Subject News *  Adjudication and Appellate orders passed without supplying seized documents to assessee quashed: Bombay High Court stays coercive GST recovery. *  GST search without sharing DIN violates transparency safeguards, but doesn’t invalidate search: Madras High Court. *  Statutory GST appeal can’t be circumvented by mere natural justice allegations: Bombay HC. *  Whether banks can simultaneously avail ITC u/s 17(2) and 17(4)? - Madras High Court stays GST adjudication against City Union Bank. *  Driver’s statement on plain paper has ‘Very Little Evidentiary Value’: Allahabad High Court quashes GST penalty order. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied on duty-paid inputs from area-based exempt units: CESTAT. *  Ignoring taxpayer’s reply while rejecting GST refund is illegal: Bombay High Court. *  Dept. can’t allege suppression after earlier audit on same issue: CESTAT quashes Excise demand on limitation. *  Sales-tax concession cannot be denied unless government notification is expressly rescinded: Telangana High Court. *  GST appeal delay condoned after portal continued to show case as ‘Pending for order’: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs duty exemption can’t be denied without test report to support reclassification: CESTAT. *  Recovery can’t continue during pending GST appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court directs ITC unblocking after statutory pre-deposit. *  Revenue neutrality must be proven with evidence, not assumptions: Madras High Court restores Rs. 20.37 crore Excise demand. *  GST limitation applies to issuance of assessment order, not its service: Calcutta High Court. *  Time barred SCN can’t sustain service tax demand against sub-contractor: CESTAT. *  Absence of mandatory approval in GST sec. 74 adjudication, Karnataka High Court restrained dept. from coercive action. *  GST registration cancellation: Karnataka High court holds appeal u/s 107 is proper remedy *  Service tax tecovery from deceased proprietor’s widow quashed: Chhattisgarh High Court *  No coercive GST recovery against former partner till appeal is decided: Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  GST appeal barred by limitation, Rajasthan HC allows delayed appeal where delay was beyond taxpayer’s control. *  GST on diagnostic services must first be decided by AAR, not High Court: Delhi HC *  Interim relief granted against GST demand on RIICO land conversion premium: Rajasthan High Court *  Printing manufacturer’s name on packaging for statutory compliance is not branding, GST exemption can’t be denied: GSTAT *  Overseas marketing & support services are export of services, not intermediary services: CESTAT. *  Duty paid through CENVAT credit can’t be demanded again in cash: CESTAT *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT.  

Comments

Madras High Court stays GST demand after finding prima facie double taxation in ongoing housing project.

Madras High Court stays GST demand after finding prima facie double taxation in ongoing housing project.
Department News


Query
 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com