Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC  *  Haryana GST Dept. Directs Physical Intimation of SCNs and Demand Orders By Post Despite Portal Service  *  Service Tax Liability Can’t Be Computed Without Extending Benefit Of Cum-Tax Valuation Where Consideration Received From Customers Was Inclusive Of Service Tax: CESTAT *  CA Certificate and Buyer Confirmation Sufficient to Rebut Unjust Enrichment: CESTAT   *  SEZ Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Discrepancies When Services Were Used for Authorized Operations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation. *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order Denying ITC on Captive Solar Power Plant *  CBIC Continues Tariff Values for Gold, Silver, Edible Oils and Areca Nuts Under Customs Valuation Framework *  Customs Dept. Can’t Deny Exemption Benefits Based On Laboratory Test Reports Not Drawn As Per ISI: CESTAT
Subject News *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation *  Assessee Can’t Use Writ Jurisdiction to Bypass GST Appeal Deadline: Allahabad High Court *  Personal Hearing Before Reply Deadline: Uttarakhand HC Quashes GST Assessment Order. *  GST Assessment Order Invalid Where Notice, Reply, Hearing Dates Were Fixed on Same Day: Allahabad High Court *  GST Assessment Order Quashed for Denial of Personal Hearing Despite Taxpayer Opting ‘No’ in DRC-06: Gujarat High Court *  Reversal of CENVAT Credit Equals Non-Availment: CESTAT *  Rule 9(1)(bb) Can’t Be Invoked to Deny CENVAT Credit When Penalty Proceedings Fail: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1237

Whether the pick up and drop facility of employees by bus is liable to service tax?
 
 


Case:-   M/S PEARL TRAVELS VS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DAMAN

Citation: - 2012-TIOL-1195-CESTAT-AHM

 
Brief fact: - The Stay application is filed for the waiver of pre-deposit of Service tax of Rs 16,84,057/- and penalties under various section of Finance Act,1994 which was confirmed by the lower authorities on the ground that the appellant herein is providing Rent-a-Cab Service and Business Support Service to Welspun India Ltd.

Appellant Contention: The Appellant submitted that various decisions of the Tribunal have already taken a view that transportation of employees based upon per kilometer running of the vehicles, which is in control of the appellant, would not be liable for tax under Rent-a-Cab service. It is also his submission that out of the demand for Rent-a-Cab service, they have already deposited approximately an amount of Rs. 1.44 Lakhs. As regards the service tax liability under Business Support Service, he further submitted that as per the agreement/contract entered into with M/s. Welspun India Limited, the appellant is required to maintain the buses, fill the fuel, pay the RTO Taxes and in turn the appellant is reimbursed the amount at the rate of Rs. 16.12 per kilometer for big buses and Rs. 10.94 per kilometer for small buses. As the appellant is managing the buses which are procured by M/s. Welspun India Limited and given to them for running the same for transportation of the employees, therefore it would fall under the category of support service of business and commerce. He further analyzed the definition of Business Support Services and submits that the revenue is trying to put these services under the Category of Infrastructural Support Service, which is not mentioned in the said definition.
 
Respondent Contention:- The  Learned departmental representative  reiterate the finding of the lower authorities.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:  The Tribunal held that the definition of Support Services of Business and Commerce indicates that it means - "services provided in relation to Business or Commerce" and also has an inclusive definition after this sentence. At this juncture, the Tribunal Contended that the transportation of the employees from their residence to factory premises or vice versa, could be in relation to the business of the said M/s. Welspun India Limited of manufacturing activity. The issue in this regard is needs to be gone into detail and in depth, which can be done only at the time of final disposal of appeal. Considering the fact that appellant has already deposited an amount of Rs. 1.44 Lakhs and the issue being debatable, Therefore Tribunal direct the appellant to further deposit an amount of Rs. 2,50,000/- (Rupees two Lakhs fifty thousand only) within eight weeks from today and report compliance on 20.09.2012. Subject to such compliance being reported, the application for waiver of pre-deposit of balance amounts involved is allowed and recovery thereof stayed till the disposal of appeal.
 
 
Decision:- Conditional Stay granted
 
Comments:-  Although it is a stay matter only but this matter is still very disputed. Even after the introduction of negative list, whether this service will fall under service tax? The “contract carriage” and “ stage carriage” is still exempted. Whether this activity will fall under this category? The times to come will decide.
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com