Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

ANALYSIS OF FINAL TRANSITIONAL RULES VIS A VIS TEXTILE SECTOR

ANALYSIS OF FINAL TRANSITIONAL RULES VIS A VIS TEXTILE SECTOR

The GST Council has finalized the transitional rules in the meeting held on 03.06.2017 and the final rules are available on the public domain. Representations were made to the government for increasing the percentage of credit admissible in case of non-availability of duty paid documents and it appears that the cries of the assessees have been considered. The final transitional rules provide that where a registered person other than a manufacturer or supplier of services, is not in possession of an invoice or any other document evidencing payment of duty, then the said person will be allowed to avail input tax credit on goods on which duty of excise or CVD under section 3(1) of the Customs Act is leviable in the following manner:-
• If the rate of CGST leviable on the goods is 9% or more, then credit admissible shall be 60% of central tax applicable. 
• If the rate of CGST leviable on goods is less than 9%, then credit admissible on such inputs shall be 40% of central tax applicable.
Furthermore, if IGST is applicable on supply, then also credit shall be admissible. In this case, goods on which IGST is leviable at the rate of 18% or above then credit admissible shall be 30%. In other cases the credit admissible shall be 20%. 
 This credit shall be allowed for 6 months subject to following conditions:-
1. These goods were not unconditionally exempt from the whole of the duty of excise or were not nil rated in the said Schedule. 
2. The procurement documents of goods is available with the registered person. 
3. The assessee must have provided details of stock in statement FORM GST TRAN 2 at the end of each of the six months giving details of supplies of such goods.
4. The credit allowed shall be credited to the electronic credit ledger of the applicant maintained in FORM GST PMT-2 on the Common Portal. 
5. The stock of goods on which the credit is availed is stored so therefore they can be easily identified by the registered person.

The above provision has great implication in the context of textile industry. It is pertinent to note that the benefit of credit shall be admissible only if such goods were not unconditionally exempt from whole of the duty of excise specified in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or were not nil rated in the said schedule. This condition is required to be critically analysed. It is also worth noting that the draft transitional rules released on 31.03.2017 stated the similar condition with the difference that the benefit of credit was allowed only if such goods were not wholly exempt from duty of excise specified in the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or were not nil rated. On comparing the provisions of the final transitional rules with that proposed in the draft rules, we find that the scope of the condition has been narrowed in the final rules. As per the draft transitional rules, the benefit of deemed credit on stock of goods was available only on the condition that the goods were not wholly exempt from the duty of excise and were not nil rated. However, as per the final transitional rules, the benefit of deemed credit will not be admissible if the goods were unconditionally exempt or were nil rated. It is worth noting that the word exempt is being prefixed with word unconditional thereby meaning that if deemed credit will not be available only if the goods were unconditionally exempt or nil rated. This means that if the goods are exempt but with condition, the benefit of deemed credit will be still available. This interpretation is of immense importance to the textile industry.

Another point that needs deliberation is that the benefit of deemed credit is admissible on goods on which duty of excise or CVD under section 3(1) of the Customs Act is leviable. We submit that it is important to understand that the term used is ‘leviable’ and not ‘paid’. We submit that it is possible that the duty is leviable but the same is not paid due to exemption prevalent in law. Consequently, we may interpret that the benefit of deemed credit is admissible with respect to textile products falling under chapter 50 to 63 because the central excise duty is leviable on such products but is exempted by virtue of exemption notification no. 30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004. Since, the term ‘leviable’ is of wider scope than ‘payable’, the goods on which central excise duty is leviable irrespective of the fact whether the said duty is paid or not will be eligible for credit availment.

Presently, according to notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004, there is complete exemption to specified textile products falling under chapter 50 to 63 on the condition that no cenvat credit of inputs has been taken. Hence, we can say that the exemption to the textile sector is a conditional exemption with the condition that cenvat credit of inputs used has not been taken. Consequently, one may interpret that trader of textile products which has procured goods cleared under notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004 may be eligible to avail the benefit of deemed credit as the restriction is only for goods which are unconditionally exempt from the whole of duty of excise. Since the goods cleared under notification no. 30/2004-C.E. dated 09.07.2004 are conditionally exempt, the embargo will not apply to such goods. This interpretation may lead to manufacturers of such products transferring all their stock to their dealers/traders as it is quite probable that such manufacturers do not have valid duty paying document to avail credit under the provision of section 140(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 but they may ensure that at least the benefit of deemed credit is taken by the dealers/traders. In our opinion, such a practise although legally valid may not be accepted by the revenue authorities and the assessees may end up fastening themselves with penal consequences.

 

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com

 
 and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com