Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Circular 103/22/2019-GST dated 28th June 2019

Clarification regarding determination of Place of Supply in certain cases

GST Update on Circular 103/22/2019-GST dated 28th June 2019
 
The place of supply has been in dispute since its inception. Even the dispute was there in service tax regime also. It has continued in GST era also. The Government intends to clarify the disputes related to place of supply by issuance of circular. This circular intends to discuss about the issues under Place of Supply in case of:-

* Services provided by Ports in respect of arrival of wagons at port.
 
* Services on unpolished diamonds such as cutting and polishing activity, which have been temporarily imported into India and are not put to any use in India.
 
 
1. Services provided by Ports in respect of arrival of wagons at port which includes the services are in respect of arrival of wagons at port, haulage of wagons inside port area up-to place of unloading, siding of wagons inside the port, unloading of wagons, movement of unloaded cargo to plot and staking hereof, movement of unloaded cargo to berth, shipment/loading on vessel. It was argued at some places that it is service related to immovable property, hence the place of supply should be the location of immovable property.

2. Further, two things decide whether a supply is inter-state or intra-state. One is location of supplier and other is place of supply. If location of supplier and place of supply are in the same state then CGST and SGST is to be charged. But if it is in different state then IGST is to be charged. Now, if we take place of supply as port being the immovable property and location of supplier i.e. location of shipping line. If Indian shipping line provides the services then CGST/SGST/IGST will be charged depending on location of supplier and place of supply. But if the foreign shipping lines provides the services then location of Service will be outside India but the place of supply is in India. Hence, it will be treated as import of service and importer has to pay tax under reverse charge method.
 
3. However, it is clarified that the services provided by the Port Authorities are not related to immovable property but are in relation or incidental to the cargo handling services, hence the place of supply will be goverened as per the 12(2) or 13(2) which are the general clauses of section 12 and 13 respectively. Sec 12(2) covers the cases where the Supplier and the Recipient both are in India.

If the Recipient is Registered POS will be the location where the Recipient is registered
If the recepient is not registered but his address exists on record POS will be the location of the address which exists on records
If the recepient is not registered and his address also does not exists POS will be the Location of Supplier

 
Thus, the Indian shipping line provides the services to Indian exporter or importer then tax will be charged accordingly. But in case of foreign shipping line providing service to Registered Indian customers then also the tax will be charged as import of service. If it is provided to unregistered Indian customer then also the place of supply will be usual place of business then it will be import of service. In that case also, the Indian recipient has to take the registration and pay the GST under reverse charge following the recent Advance Ruling in case of Jalaram feeds. Last situation where the usual place of business is not available on record is a very hypothetical as importer/exporter has to give usual place of business while filing Bill of Entry or shipping bill with the custom department. Hence, third situation does not arise. Thus, in every case, the tax is to be paid either under forward charge or reverse charge.
 
 
4. Second issue clarified by this circular is that the Services on unpolished diamonds such as cutting and polishing activity, which have been temporarily imported into India and are not put to any use in India then it has been clarified that the POS shall be governed as per 13(2) shall apply
 
Although it is the case of performance based services yet the circular has not clarified on this line. If performance based service is applicable then generally 13(3)(a) applies here. In that case, the place of supply will be place where performance has taken place. When it is imported into India and repairing is done in India then place of supply will be in India. The provider of service is also the person who has done repairing, hence the location of such service provider is also in India and place of supply is also in India, hence GST will be payable. But it will not qualify for export of service as place of supply is in India only.
 
However, the circular says that where goods which are temporarily imported into India for repairs or for any other treatment or process and are exported after such repairs or treatment or process without being put to any use in India, other than that which is required for such repairs or treatment or process, the place of supply would be determined as per 13(2).
Sec 13(2) covers the cases where any of the Supplier or the Recipient is outside India.
 

If the location of Recipient is known POS will be the location where the Recipient is located
If the location of recipient is not available POS will be the Location of Supplier

 
Now, in this case supply provider is in India and recipient is outside Indian then place of supply in that case will be location of recipient i.e. outside India. Hence, it will be termed as export of service if the payment is received in foreign convertible currency. Hence, it is beneficial to assessee as no tax will be applicable on export of services. The second provision of location of recipient is not available is not in existence in real life. He has to declare his address while sending goods into India. He has to declare normal value of goods also so as to clear the formalities of Customs.

This update is solely for educational purpose

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/
GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ and follow us on twitter https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com