Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

GST Update on Circular 103/22/2019-GST dated 28th June 2019

Clarification regarding determination of Place of Supply in certain cases

GST Update on Circular 103/22/2019-GST dated 28th June 2019
 
The place of supply has been in dispute since its inception. Even the dispute was there in service tax regime also. It has continued in GST era also. The Government intends to clarify the disputes related to place of supply by issuance of circular. This circular intends to discuss about the issues under Place of Supply in case of:-

* Services provided by Ports in respect of arrival of wagons at port.
 
* Services on unpolished diamonds such as cutting and polishing activity, which have been temporarily imported into India and are not put to any use in India.
 
 
1. Services provided by Ports in respect of arrival of wagons at port which includes the services are in respect of arrival of wagons at port, haulage of wagons inside port area up-to place of unloading, siding of wagons inside the port, unloading of wagons, movement of unloaded cargo to plot and staking hereof, movement of unloaded cargo to berth, shipment/loading on vessel. It was argued at some places that it is service related to immovable property, hence the place of supply should be the location of immovable property.

2. Further, two things decide whether a supply is inter-state or intra-state. One is location of supplier and other is place of supply. If location of supplier and place of supply are in the same state then CGST and SGST is to be charged. But if it is in different state then IGST is to be charged. Now, if we take place of supply as port being the immovable property and location of supplier i.e. location of shipping line. If Indian shipping line provides the services then CGST/SGST/IGST will be charged depending on location of supplier and place of supply. But if the foreign shipping lines provides the services then location of Service will be outside India but the place of supply is in India. Hence, it will be treated as import of service and importer has to pay tax under reverse charge method.
 
3. However, it is clarified that the services provided by the Port Authorities are not related to immovable property but are in relation or incidental to the cargo handling services, hence the place of supply will be goverened as per the 12(2) or 13(2) which are the general clauses of section 12 and 13 respectively. Sec 12(2) covers the cases where the Supplier and the Recipient both are in India.

If the Recipient is Registered POS will be the location where the Recipient is registered
If the recepient is not registered but his address exists on record POS will be the location of the address which exists on records
If the recepient is not registered and his address also does not exists POS will be the Location of Supplier

 
Thus, the Indian shipping line provides the services to Indian exporter or importer then tax will be charged accordingly. But in case of foreign shipping line providing service to Registered Indian customers then also the tax will be charged as import of service. If it is provided to unregistered Indian customer then also the place of supply will be usual place of business then it will be import of service. In that case also, the Indian recipient has to take the registration and pay the GST under reverse charge following the recent Advance Ruling in case of Jalaram feeds. Last situation where the usual place of business is not available on record is a very hypothetical as importer/exporter has to give usual place of business while filing Bill of Entry or shipping bill with the custom department. Hence, third situation does not arise. Thus, in every case, the tax is to be paid either under forward charge or reverse charge.
 
 
4. Second issue clarified by this circular is that the Services on unpolished diamonds such as cutting and polishing activity, which have been temporarily imported into India and are not put to any use in India then it has been clarified that the POS shall be governed as per 13(2) shall apply
 
Although it is the case of performance based services yet the circular has not clarified on this line. If performance based service is applicable then generally 13(3)(a) applies here. In that case, the place of supply will be place where performance has taken place. When it is imported into India and repairing is done in India then place of supply will be in India. The provider of service is also the person who has done repairing, hence the location of such service provider is also in India and place of supply is also in India, hence GST will be payable. But it will not qualify for export of service as place of supply is in India only.
 
However, the circular says that where goods which are temporarily imported into India for repairs or for any other treatment or process and are exported after such repairs or treatment or process without being put to any use in India, other than that which is required for such repairs or treatment or process, the place of supply would be determined as per 13(2).
Sec 13(2) covers the cases where any of the Supplier or the Recipient is outside India.
 

If the location of Recipient is known POS will be the location where the Recipient is located
If the location of recipient is not available POS will be the Location of Supplier

 
Now, in this case supply provider is in India and recipient is outside Indian then place of supply in that case will be location of recipient i.e. outside India. Hence, it will be termed as export of service if the payment is received in foreign convertible currency. Hence, it is beneficial to assessee as no tax will be applicable on export of services. The second provision of location of recipient is not available is not in existence in real life. He has to declare his address while sending goods into India. He has to declare normal value of goods also so as to clear the formalities of Customs.

This update is solely for educational purpose

You can reach us at www.capradeepjain.com and also at our facebook page at
https://www.facebook.com/
GSTTODAYBYPRADEEPJAIN/ and follow us on twitter https://www.twitter.com/@capradeepjain21
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com