Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Failure to issue mandatory ASMT-10 notice vitiates GST proceedings: Rajasthan High Court. *  GST SCN against dead proprietor invalid: Orissa High Court *  GST registration revived despite time-barred appeal, subject to full tax payment: Himachal Pradesh HC *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold 
Subject News *  Overseas marketing & support services are export of services, not intermediary services: CESTAT. *  Duty paid through CENVAT credit can’t be demanded again in cash: CESTAT *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC   

Comments

() Posted On: 20 Aug, 2020

We are selling a second hand car which was purchased in VAT period. We have sold the same in June 2020. Whether the GST is to be paid on complete amount or on the margin only? Futher, the abatement will be available on the same. Whether benefit of both notifications will be available to us? Eloborate with an example.

Ans. This query is in reference to our Query No. 3 posted on 19th Aug 2020 as ?GST QUERIES #93/2020-21? regarding sale of used Motor Vehicle. We have received a lot of comments on this query and we are very thankful to our vigilant readers for the feedback of the same. We had mistakenly written that the abatement is @65%. We intend to apologize our vigilant readers for the inconvenience caused due to typo- graphical error. We really appreciate our readers for putting up the concern so that it could be rectified. So, in this note we intend to discuss the applicability of tax on sale of used Vehicle. We shall be discussing two important notifications issued with respect to sale of used vehicles. ? Notification No. 37/2017 ? Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017 It has been issued to provide for tax at 65% of central tax applicable on motor vehicles falling in tariff heading 87 under Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated, 28th June, 2017. The benefit under the above notification is admissible if the following conditions are satisfied:- 1. The supplier of Motor Vehicle is a registered person. 2. Such supplier had purchased the Motor Vehicle prior to 1st July, 2017 and has not availed input tax credit of central excise duty, Value Added Tax or any other taxes paid on such vehicles Also, the sunset clause of this notification has been kept as 1st July, 2020. In view of above discussion, it is clear that the benefit of paying tax only on 65% shall be available. ? Notification No. 8/2018 ? Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018 This notification intends to exempt and reduce the rate specified in notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) applicable on the sale of used vehicles. We are presenting the rates period wise and vehicle wise below in a tabular form for ease of reference Category of vehicle (Based on notification no.01/2017 & 08/2018) ? CT (R) GST rate up to 25/01/2018 GST rate from 25/01/2018 Petrol Vehicles with more than 1200cc engine capacity & 4000mm length (HSN 8703) 28% 18% Diesel Vehicles with more than 1500cc engine capacity & 4000mm length (HSN 8703) 28% 18% SUVs (including utility vehicles) with more than 1500cc engine capacity (HSN 8703) 28% 18% Vehicles other than those mentioned above, including other vehicles under chapter 87 28%/18%/12%* 12% For the purposes of obtaining the benefit under this notification, the above two conditions specified in 37/2017-Central Tax (Rate) need to be satisfied. Explanation given in this notification determines the taxable value which shall be difference between the consideration received for supply of such goods and depreciated value of goods on the date of supply. If it is positive then it is to be taxed at the rates specified above in the table. If it is Negative then no tax is payable. Now, the moot question that arises here is whether the abatement of 35% shall also continue along with the benefit of margin scheme. Notification 37/2017 is issued under section 9(1) of the Act which explains levy and collection of CGST on intra state supplies. Notification number 8/2018 is issued under Section 11 of CGST Act, 2017 provides power to government for granting exemption from CGST on intra state supplies. Thus, accordingly, both the notifications are issued under different sections of the Act i.e. section 9 which prescribes tariff rates while section 11 grants exemption. Thus, both are not exemption notification. Therefore, benefits of both the notification can be availed. Now, we will explain the above query with the help of an example, Mr. X purchased a vehicle on 01.04.2012 that is pre-GST regime for Rs. 6,00,000/-. He wants to sell his vehicle for Rs. 1,20,000/-. And the WDV on date of supply is Rs. 1,00,000/-. Let us analyse the amount of tax considering two different dates for the supply of Vehicle a. Calculation of tax if supplied on 30th June 2020 Sale price = Rs. 1,20,000/- WDV as on 30.06.2020 = Rs. 1,00,000/- Margin as on 30.06.2020= Rs. 20,000/- Abatement @ 35% = Rs. 7000/- Taxable amount =Rs. 13000/- If the tax rate applicable on this car is 18%, the tax amount shall be derived as = 13,000*18/100 = 2,340/-
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com