Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  MSME iron and steel exporters get interest subvention relief extension *  DGFT Activates Online Post Export EPCG Module: Streamlines Issuance, Re-Issuance & Utilisation Of Duty Credit Scrips *  Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court.
Subject News *  High Court Orders To Revive GST Number Cancelled During All-India Fake GST Registration Drive *  GST not applicable on leasehold rights transfer, holds Bombay High Court *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case.  

Comments

() Posted On: 20 Aug, 2020

We are selling a second hand car which was purchased in VAT period. We have sold the same in June 2020. Whether the GST is to be paid on complete amount or on the margin only? Futher, the abatement will be available on the same. Whether benefit of both notifications will be available to us? Eloborate with an example.

Ans. This query is in reference to our Query No. 3 posted on 19th Aug 2020 as ?GST QUERIES #93/2020-21? regarding sale of used Motor Vehicle. We have received a lot of comments on this query and we are very thankful to our vigilant readers for the feedback of the same. We had mistakenly written that the abatement is @65%. We intend to apologize our vigilant readers for the inconvenience caused due to typo- graphical error. We really appreciate our readers for putting up the concern so that it could be rectified. So, in this note we intend to discuss the applicability of tax on sale of used Vehicle. We shall be discussing two important notifications issued with respect to sale of used vehicles. ? Notification No. 37/2017 ? Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017 It has been issued to provide for tax at 65% of central tax applicable on motor vehicles falling in tariff heading 87 under Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated, 28th June, 2017. The benefit under the above notification is admissible if the following conditions are satisfied:- 1. The supplier of Motor Vehicle is a registered person. 2. Such supplier had purchased the Motor Vehicle prior to 1st July, 2017 and has not availed input tax credit of central excise duty, Value Added Tax or any other taxes paid on such vehicles Also, the sunset clause of this notification has been kept as 1st July, 2020. In view of above discussion, it is clear that the benefit of paying tax only on 65% shall be available. ? Notification No. 8/2018 ? Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018 This notification intends to exempt and reduce the rate specified in notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) applicable on the sale of used vehicles. We are presenting the rates period wise and vehicle wise below in a tabular form for ease of reference Category of vehicle (Based on notification no.01/2017 & 08/2018) ? CT (R) GST rate up to 25/01/2018 GST rate from 25/01/2018 Petrol Vehicles with more than 1200cc engine capacity & 4000mm length (HSN 8703) 28% 18% Diesel Vehicles with more than 1500cc engine capacity & 4000mm length (HSN 8703) 28% 18% SUVs (including utility vehicles) with more than 1500cc engine capacity (HSN 8703) 28% 18% Vehicles other than those mentioned above, including other vehicles under chapter 87 28%/18%/12%* 12% For the purposes of obtaining the benefit under this notification, the above two conditions specified in 37/2017-Central Tax (Rate) need to be satisfied. Explanation given in this notification determines the taxable value which shall be difference between the consideration received for supply of such goods and depreciated value of goods on the date of supply. If it is positive then it is to be taxed at the rates specified above in the table. If it is Negative then no tax is payable. Now, the moot question that arises here is whether the abatement of 35% shall also continue along with the benefit of margin scheme. Notification 37/2017 is issued under section 9(1) of the Act which explains levy and collection of CGST on intra state supplies. Notification number 8/2018 is issued under Section 11 of CGST Act, 2017 provides power to government for granting exemption from CGST on intra state supplies. Thus, accordingly, both the notifications are issued under different sections of the Act i.e. section 9 which prescribes tariff rates while section 11 grants exemption. Thus, both are not exemption notification. Therefore, benefits of both the notification can be availed. Now, we will explain the above query with the help of an example, Mr. X purchased a vehicle on 01.04.2012 that is pre-GST regime for Rs. 6,00,000/-. He wants to sell his vehicle for Rs. 1,20,000/-. And the WDV on date of supply is Rs. 1,00,000/-. Let us analyse the amount of tax considering two different dates for the supply of Vehicle a. Calculation of tax if supplied on 30th June 2020 Sale price = Rs. 1,20,000/- WDV as on 30.06.2020 = Rs. 1,00,000/- Margin as on 30.06.2020= Rs. 20,000/- Abatement @ 35% = Rs. 7000/- Taxable amount =Rs. 13000/- If the tax rate applicable on this car is 18%, the tax amount shall be derived as = 13,000*18/100 = 2,340/-
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com