Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

() Posted On: 20 Aug, 2020

We are selling a second hand car which was purchased in VAT period. We have sold the same in June 2020. Whether the GST is to be paid on complete amount or on the margin only? Futher, the abatement will be available on the same. Whether benefit of both notifications will be available to us? Eloborate with an example.

Ans. This query is in reference to our Query No. 3 posted on 19th Aug 2020 as ?GST QUERIES #93/2020-21? regarding sale of used Motor Vehicle. We have received a lot of comments on this query and we are very thankful to our vigilant readers for the feedback of the same. We had mistakenly written that the abatement is @65%. We intend to apologize our vigilant readers for the inconvenience caused due to typo- graphical error. We really appreciate our readers for putting up the concern so that it could be rectified. So, in this note we intend to discuss the applicability of tax on sale of used Vehicle. We shall be discussing two important notifications issued with respect to sale of used vehicles. ? Notification No. 37/2017 ? Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.10.2017 It has been issued to provide for tax at 65% of central tax applicable on motor vehicles falling in tariff heading 87 under Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated, 28th June, 2017. The benefit under the above notification is admissible if the following conditions are satisfied:- 1. The supplier of Motor Vehicle is a registered person. 2. Such supplier had purchased the Motor Vehicle prior to 1st July, 2017 and has not availed input tax credit of central excise duty, Value Added Tax or any other taxes paid on such vehicles Also, the sunset clause of this notification has been kept as 1st July, 2020. In view of above discussion, it is clear that the benefit of paying tax only on 65% shall be available. ? Notification No. 8/2018 ? Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018 This notification intends to exempt and reduce the rate specified in notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) applicable on the sale of used vehicles. We are presenting the rates period wise and vehicle wise below in a tabular form for ease of reference Category of vehicle (Based on notification no.01/2017 & 08/2018) ? CT (R) GST rate up to 25/01/2018 GST rate from 25/01/2018 Petrol Vehicles with more than 1200cc engine capacity & 4000mm length (HSN 8703) 28% 18% Diesel Vehicles with more than 1500cc engine capacity & 4000mm length (HSN 8703) 28% 18% SUVs (including utility vehicles) with more than 1500cc engine capacity (HSN 8703) 28% 18% Vehicles other than those mentioned above, including other vehicles under chapter 87 28%/18%/12%* 12% For the purposes of obtaining the benefit under this notification, the above two conditions specified in 37/2017-Central Tax (Rate) need to be satisfied. Explanation given in this notification determines the taxable value which shall be difference between the consideration received for supply of such goods and depreciated value of goods on the date of supply. If it is positive then it is to be taxed at the rates specified above in the table. If it is Negative then no tax is payable. Now, the moot question that arises here is whether the abatement of 35% shall also continue along with the benefit of margin scheme. Notification 37/2017 is issued under section 9(1) of the Act which explains levy and collection of CGST on intra state supplies. Notification number 8/2018 is issued under Section 11 of CGST Act, 2017 provides power to government for granting exemption from CGST on intra state supplies. Thus, accordingly, both the notifications are issued under different sections of the Act i.e. section 9 which prescribes tariff rates while section 11 grants exemption. Thus, both are not exemption notification. Therefore, benefits of both the notification can be availed. Now, we will explain the above query with the help of an example, Mr. X purchased a vehicle on 01.04.2012 that is pre-GST regime for Rs. 6,00,000/-. He wants to sell his vehicle for Rs. 1,20,000/-. And the WDV on date of supply is Rs. 1,00,000/-. Let us analyse the amount of tax considering two different dates for the supply of Vehicle a. Calculation of tax if supplied on 30th June 2020 Sale price = Rs. 1,20,000/- WDV as on 30.06.2020 = Rs. 1,00,000/- Margin as on 30.06.2020= Rs. 20,000/- Abatement @ 35% = Rs. 7000/- Taxable amount =Rs. 13000/- If the tax rate applicable on this car is 18%, the tax amount shall be derived as = 13,000*18/100 = 2,340/-
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com