Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  MSME iron and steel exporters get interest subvention relief extension *  DGFT Activates Online Post Export EPCG Module: Streamlines Issuance, Re-Issuance & Utilisation Of Duty Credit Scrips *  Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court.
Subject News *  High Court Orders To Revive GST Number Cancelled During All-India Fake GST Registration Drive *  GST not applicable on leasehold rights transfer, holds Bombay High Court *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case.  

Comments

(PRAVIN SHELKE) Posted On: 27 Apr, 2014

Dear Sir, I have a query specifically on leviable of Service tax on "Fabrication" work at customer's premises which is an excisable area. 1. A job is awarded to a contractor, where both the customer and the contractor are public limited companies. 2. As per the contract awarded, there are two distinctive service components clearly spelt out in the order awarded to the contractor. 3. The first item being an erection & commissioning work to be done at the customer's site. The second item being a 'FABRICATION" work to be done by the contractor at the customer's plant(which is exciseable). The fabrication work will be done by the contractor on free issue materials to be provided by the customer which are structural items and hence partake that of 'capital' goods. 4. The opinion given as to the "Fabrication" work is that the same is not exigible to Service Tax since the same is deemed "manufacture" under Excise Duty and is to be charged Excise Duty under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act 1944 instead and here as the customer is the licensed unit under Excise Duty will be responsible for payment of Excise Duty after the fabrication work is done and the structurals are handed over to the customer. The matter presumably falls under the mischief of section 66D(f) (negative list) of the Finance Act 1994 and hence NO Service tax is to be charged on "Fabrication" work. This is true even if the excisable good is exempted under the Central Excise Act 1944. 5. However Service Tax will be charged by the contractor on the Erection and Commissioning part. 6. The first query is whether the contractor be allowed NOT to charge Service Tax as per point 4 above ? Please note the contractor is not registered as an excisable unit but is registered under Service Tax. 7. The second query is whether the contractor can avail any Input Credit on Service rendered to it by the contractor's sub-contractor on the same Fabrication job? I shall be grateful if you kindly forward your valued opinion. Regards Pravin

As the fabrication work done at customer’s plant is excisable therefore it shall not be charged to service tax by the contractor. The opinion received by you is accurate that the goods as are deemed manufacture than same shall be charged with excise and not with service tax. The process amounting to manufactured are exempted from payment of service tax by virtue of exemption contained in point (f) of Section 66D (negative list) of Finance Act, 1994. Hence the same shall not be taxable to service tax. As the contractor is not registered in excise law, he shall get registered as he is producing an excisable product. As the contractor is not registered in Excise law and not paying Excise duty then he cannot be eligible to take credit for the same. However, if he takes registration for fabrication work and pays duty then he is eligible for taking credit on input services relating to such fabrication work.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com