Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Study/2020-21/155
23 May 2020

What rate of GST shall be applicable on Psyllium husk powder 5% or 18%?
M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd. (AAR No. RAJ/AAR/2020-21/02) dated 06.05.2020
 
Issue involved: What rate of GST shall be applicable on Psyllium husk powder 5% or 18%?
Brief Facts: M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in manufacture of Psyllium husk powder and registered under GST. They procure psyllium husk which is crushed to form psyllium husk powder.
 
Applicant’s Contention: The assessee has contended in the following manner
  1. The present application for advance ruling has been filed to confirm the classification of Psyllium Husk Powder and the rate of GST applicable thereon. In order to arrive at perfect conclusion, it is pertinent to make reference to various aspects that aid in the classification of their product Psyllium Husk Powder under GST regime.
  2. The applicant submits that their product “Psyllium Husk Powder” is not expressly defined anywhere either in the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing GST rates for levy of CGST or in the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.05.2017 prescribing GST rates for levy of IGST. Consequently, the rate of GST applicable on the product “Psyllium Husk Powder” is 18% under the residual entry which reads as follows:-
Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing CGST rate of 9%
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
453 Any Chapter Goods which are specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI.
 
Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing IGST rate of 18%
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
453 Any Chapter Goods which are specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI.
 
The applicant submits that since their product is not expressly specified under any of the serial numbers in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI, it is covered under above cited serial no. 453 attracting GST rate of 18%. 
  1. The applicant further submits that according to serial no. 73 of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, 2.5% CGST rate has been prescribed. Similarly, as per serial no. 73 of the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, Schedule I prescribes IGST rate of 18%. The content of the entry is as follows:-
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
73 1211 Plants and parts of plants (including seeds and fruits), of a kind used primarily in perfumery, in pharmacy or for insecticidal, fungicidal or similar purpose, frozen or dried, whether or not cut, crushed or powdered
 
The applicant submits that their product Psyllium Husk Powder does not fall under the above cited entry as the above entry includes plants and parts of plants including seeds and fruits used in pharmacy whether or not crushed or powdered. It is submitted that the applicant is engaged in the process of crushing and powdering the husk of Psyllium and not its seed. The process begins with cleaning of raw seeds and de-husking. The seeds are crushed and husk is separated. The Psyllium Husk Powder is obtained by crushing the pure husk Psyllium. Therefore, it is clear that the product Psyllium Husk Powder is not covered by the above mentioned serial number and is covered by the residuary serial no. 453 specifying GST rate of 18% as stated in preceding paragraphs. The detail of the manufacturing process undertaken is enclosed for ready reference.
 
The applicant further submits that at times they procure Psyllium Husk Powder from various suppliers and they also charge GST at the rate of 18%. The applicant hereby encloses the specimen copies of invoices wherein GST rate of 18% has been charged. The applicant submits that according to general trade parlance, GST rate of 18% is being charged on supply of Psyllium Husk Powder. Therefore, the applicability of GST rate of 18% should be confirmed on Psyllium
Reasoning by the authority: The authority said that Psyllium is a plant (popularly known as Isabghol) whose parts such as seeds and others are used to prepare some Pharmacy Products specially laxative medicines.
The authority confirmed that Psyllium Husk powder as per notification number 1/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28.6 2017 is covered under serial number 73 of schedule 1 of the said notification attracting GST @ 5% the relevant entry in respect of it is as under-
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/Tariff Item Description of Goods
73 1211 Plant and parts of plant (including seeds and fruits) of a kind used primarily in perfumery in pharmacy or for insecticidal fungicidal or similar purpose, frozen a driven, whether or not crushed or powdered.
Pysllium is a plant which part is crushed in powder form to prepare a pharmaceutical product. The notification explicitly matches the preparation process undertaken by the applicant and moreover, CBSE issued clarification in form of FAQs vide F.No.332/2/2017-TRU in December 2017 regarding classification and rate of GST on psyllium husk and seeds which prescribed rate i.e. 5%
The applicant has contested that as the classification and rate of GST is not mentioned anyway notification number 1/2017, therefore the classification will fall under the residual entry of serial number 453 of schedule III of set notification which is not valid.
Decision: The Rajasthan AAR has pronounced the ruling that Psyllium Plant or its parts is classifiable under HSN 12119032 and attracts GST @ 5% as provided under Notification No. 1/2017 central tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Conclusion: The applicant has produced invoices wherein they were charging 18% stating that the product is not expressly specified in the rate notifications. But AAR has outlined the judgement of Honourable Supreme court in the case of Dunlop India Ltd. and Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. wherein it was said that product specific entry cannot be overridden by general/residual entry.
 Prepared by CA Akanksha Bohra
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com