Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Study/2020-21/155
23 May 2020

What rate of GST shall be applicable on Psyllium husk powder 5% or 18%?
M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd. (AAR No. RAJ/AAR/2020-21/02) dated 06.05.2020
 
Issue involved: What rate of GST shall be applicable on Psyllium husk powder 5% or 18%?
Brief Facts: M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in manufacture of Psyllium husk powder and registered under GST. They procure psyllium husk which is crushed to form psyllium husk powder.
 
Applicant’s Contention: The assessee has contended in the following manner
  1. The present application for advance ruling has been filed to confirm the classification of Psyllium Husk Powder and the rate of GST applicable thereon. In order to arrive at perfect conclusion, it is pertinent to make reference to various aspects that aid in the classification of their product Psyllium Husk Powder under GST regime.
  2. The applicant submits that their product “Psyllium Husk Powder” is not expressly defined anywhere either in the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing GST rates for levy of CGST or in the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.05.2017 prescribing GST rates for levy of IGST. Consequently, the rate of GST applicable on the product “Psyllium Husk Powder” is 18% under the residual entry which reads as follows:-
Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing CGST rate of 9%
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
453 Any Chapter Goods which are specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI.
 
Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing IGST rate of 18%
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
453 Any Chapter Goods which are specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI.
 
The applicant submits that since their product is not expressly specified under any of the serial numbers in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI, it is covered under above cited serial no. 453 attracting GST rate of 18%. 
  1. The applicant further submits that according to serial no. 73 of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, 2.5% CGST rate has been prescribed. Similarly, as per serial no. 73 of the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, Schedule I prescribes IGST rate of 18%. The content of the entry is as follows:-
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
73 1211 Plants and parts of plants (including seeds and fruits), of a kind used primarily in perfumery, in pharmacy or for insecticidal, fungicidal or similar purpose, frozen or dried, whether or not cut, crushed or powdered
 
The applicant submits that their product Psyllium Husk Powder does not fall under the above cited entry as the above entry includes plants and parts of plants including seeds and fruits used in pharmacy whether or not crushed or powdered. It is submitted that the applicant is engaged in the process of crushing and powdering the husk of Psyllium and not its seed. The process begins with cleaning of raw seeds and de-husking. The seeds are crushed and husk is separated. The Psyllium Husk Powder is obtained by crushing the pure husk Psyllium. Therefore, it is clear that the product Psyllium Husk Powder is not covered by the above mentioned serial number and is covered by the residuary serial no. 453 specifying GST rate of 18% as stated in preceding paragraphs. The detail of the manufacturing process undertaken is enclosed for ready reference.
 
The applicant further submits that at times they procure Psyllium Husk Powder from various suppliers and they also charge GST at the rate of 18%. The applicant hereby encloses the specimen copies of invoices wherein GST rate of 18% has been charged. The applicant submits that according to general trade parlance, GST rate of 18% is being charged on supply of Psyllium Husk Powder. Therefore, the applicability of GST rate of 18% should be confirmed on Psyllium
Reasoning by the authority: The authority said that Psyllium is a plant (popularly known as Isabghol) whose parts such as seeds and others are used to prepare some Pharmacy Products specially laxative medicines.
The authority confirmed that Psyllium Husk powder as per notification number 1/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28.6 2017 is covered under serial number 73 of schedule 1 of the said notification attracting GST @ 5% the relevant entry in respect of it is as under-
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/Tariff Item Description of Goods
73 1211 Plant and parts of plant (including seeds and fruits) of a kind used primarily in perfumery in pharmacy or for insecticidal fungicidal or similar purpose, frozen a driven, whether or not crushed or powdered.
Pysllium is a plant which part is crushed in powder form to prepare a pharmaceutical product. The notification explicitly matches the preparation process undertaken by the applicant and moreover, CBSE issued clarification in form of FAQs vide F.No.332/2/2017-TRU in December 2017 regarding classification and rate of GST on psyllium husk and seeds which prescribed rate i.e. 5%
The applicant has contested that as the classification and rate of GST is not mentioned anyway notification number 1/2017, therefore the classification will fall under the residual entry of serial number 453 of schedule III of set notification which is not valid.
Decision: The Rajasthan AAR has pronounced the ruling that Psyllium Plant or its parts is classifiable under HSN 12119032 and attracts GST @ 5% as provided under Notification No. 1/2017 central tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Conclusion: The applicant has produced invoices wherein they were charging 18% stating that the product is not expressly specified in the rate notifications. But AAR has outlined the judgement of Honourable Supreme court in the case of Dunlop India Ltd. and Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. wherein it was said that product specific entry cannot be overridden by general/residual entry.
 Prepared by CA Akanksha Bohra
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com