Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Study/2020-21/155
23 May 2020

What rate of GST shall be applicable on Psyllium husk powder 5% or 18%?
M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd. (AAR No. RAJ/AAR/2020-21/02) dated 06.05.2020
 
Issue involved: What rate of GST shall be applicable on Psyllium husk powder 5% or 18%?
Brief Facts: M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in manufacture of Psyllium husk powder and registered under GST. They procure psyllium husk which is crushed to form psyllium husk powder.
 
Applicant’s Contention: The assessee has contended in the following manner
  1. The present application for advance ruling has been filed to confirm the classification of Psyllium Husk Powder and the rate of GST applicable thereon. In order to arrive at perfect conclusion, it is pertinent to make reference to various aspects that aid in the classification of their product Psyllium Husk Powder under GST regime.
  2. The applicant submits that their product “Psyllium Husk Powder” is not expressly defined anywhere either in the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing GST rates for levy of CGST or in the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.05.2017 prescribing GST rates for levy of IGST. Consequently, the rate of GST applicable on the product “Psyllium Husk Powder” is 18% under the residual entry which reads as follows:-
Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing CGST rate of 9%
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
453 Any Chapter Goods which are specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI.
 
Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing IGST rate of 18%
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
453 Any Chapter Goods which are specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI.
 
The applicant submits that since their product is not expressly specified under any of the serial numbers in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI, it is covered under above cited serial no. 453 attracting GST rate of 18%. 
  1. The applicant further submits that according to serial no. 73 of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, 2.5% CGST rate has been prescribed. Similarly, as per serial no. 73 of the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, Schedule I prescribes IGST rate of 18%. The content of the entry is as follows:-
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
73 1211 Plants and parts of plants (including seeds and fruits), of a kind used primarily in perfumery, in pharmacy or for insecticidal, fungicidal or similar purpose, frozen or dried, whether or not cut, crushed or powdered
 
The applicant submits that their product Psyllium Husk Powder does not fall under the above cited entry as the above entry includes plants and parts of plants including seeds and fruits used in pharmacy whether or not crushed or powdered. It is submitted that the applicant is engaged in the process of crushing and powdering the husk of Psyllium and not its seed. The process begins with cleaning of raw seeds and de-husking. The seeds are crushed and husk is separated. The Psyllium Husk Powder is obtained by crushing the pure husk Psyllium. Therefore, it is clear that the product Psyllium Husk Powder is not covered by the above mentioned serial number and is covered by the residuary serial no. 453 specifying GST rate of 18% as stated in preceding paragraphs. The detail of the manufacturing process undertaken is enclosed for ready reference.
 
The applicant further submits that at times they procure Psyllium Husk Powder from various suppliers and they also charge GST at the rate of 18%. The applicant hereby encloses the specimen copies of invoices wherein GST rate of 18% has been charged. The applicant submits that according to general trade parlance, GST rate of 18% is being charged on supply of Psyllium Husk Powder. Therefore, the applicability of GST rate of 18% should be confirmed on Psyllium
Reasoning by the authority: The authority said that Psyllium is a plant (popularly known as Isabghol) whose parts such as seeds and others are used to prepare some Pharmacy Products specially laxative medicines.
The authority confirmed that Psyllium Husk powder as per notification number 1/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28.6 2017 is covered under serial number 73 of schedule 1 of the said notification attracting GST @ 5% the relevant entry in respect of it is as under-
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/Tariff Item Description of Goods
73 1211 Plant and parts of plant (including seeds and fruits) of a kind used primarily in perfumery in pharmacy or for insecticidal fungicidal or similar purpose, frozen a driven, whether or not crushed or powdered.
Pysllium is a plant which part is crushed in powder form to prepare a pharmaceutical product. The notification explicitly matches the preparation process undertaken by the applicant and moreover, CBSE issued clarification in form of FAQs vide F.No.332/2/2017-TRU in December 2017 regarding classification and rate of GST on psyllium husk and seeds which prescribed rate i.e. 5%
The applicant has contested that as the classification and rate of GST is not mentioned anyway notification number 1/2017, therefore the classification will fall under the residual entry of serial number 453 of schedule III of set notification which is not valid.
Decision: The Rajasthan AAR has pronounced the ruling that Psyllium Plant or its parts is classifiable under HSN 12119032 and attracts GST @ 5% as provided under Notification No. 1/2017 central tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Conclusion: The applicant has produced invoices wherein they were charging 18% stating that the product is not expressly specified in the rate notifications. But AAR has outlined the judgement of Honourable Supreme court in the case of Dunlop India Ltd. and Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. wherein it was said that product specific entry cannot be overridden by general/residual entry.
 Prepared by CA Akanksha Bohra
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com