Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Study/2020-21/155
23 May 2020

What rate of GST shall be applicable on Psyllium husk powder 5% or 18%?
M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd. (AAR No. RAJ/AAR/2020-21/02) dated 06.05.2020
 
Issue involved: What rate of GST shall be applicable on Psyllium husk powder 5% or 18%?
Brief Facts: M/s Sarda Bio Polymers Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in manufacture of Psyllium husk powder and registered under GST. They procure psyllium husk which is crushed to form psyllium husk powder.
 
Applicant’s Contention: The assessee has contended in the following manner
  1. The present application for advance ruling has been filed to confirm the classification of Psyllium Husk Powder and the rate of GST applicable thereon. In order to arrive at perfect conclusion, it is pertinent to make reference to various aspects that aid in the classification of their product Psyllium Husk Powder under GST regime.
  2. The applicant submits that their product “Psyllium Husk Powder” is not expressly defined anywhere either in the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing GST rates for levy of CGST or in the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.05.2017 prescribing GST rates for levy of IGST. Consequently, the rate of GST applicable on the product “Psyllium Husk Powder” is 18% under the residual entry which reads as follows:-
Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing CGST rate of 9%
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
453 Any Chapter Goods which are specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI.
 
Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 prescribing IGST rate of 18%
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
453 Any Chapter Goods which are specified in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI.
 
The applicant submits that since their product is not expressly specified under any of the serial numbers in Schedule I, II, IV, V or VI, it is covered under above cited serial no. 453 attracting GST rate of 18%. 
  1. The applicant further submits that according to serial no. 73 of the Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, 2.5% CGST rate has been prescribed. Similarly, as per serial no. 73 of the Notification No. 1/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, Schedule I prescribes IGST rate of 18%. The content of the entry is as follows:-
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/ Tariff Item Description of goods
(1) (2) (3)
73 1211 Plants and parts of plants (including seeds and fruits), of a kind used primarily in perfumery, in pharmacy or for insecticidal, fungicidal or similar purpose, frozen or dried, whether or not cut, crushed or powdered
 
The applicant submits that their product Psyllium Husk Powder does not fall under the above cited entry as the above entry includes plants and parts of plants including seeds and fruits used in pharmacy whether or not crushed or powdered. It is submitted that the applicant is engaged in the process of crushing and powdering the husk of Psyllium and not its seed. The process begins with cleaning of raw seeds and de-husking. The seeds are crushed and husk is separated. The Psyllium Husk Powder is obtained by crushing the pure husk Psyllium. Therefore, it is clear that the product Psyllium Husk Powder is not covered by the above mentioned serial number and is covered by the residuary serial no. 453 specifying GST rate of 18% as stated in preceding paragraphs. The detail of the manufacturing process undertaken is enclosed for ready reference.
 
The applicant further submits that at times they procure Psyllium Husk Powder from various suppliers and they also charge GST at the rate of 18%. The applicant hereby encloses the specimen copies of invoices wherein GST rate of 18% has been charged. The applicant submits that according to general trade parlance, GST rate of 18% is being charged on supply of Psyllium Husk Powder. Therefore, the applicability of GST rate of 18% should be confirmed on Psyllium
Reasoning by the authority: The authority said that Psyllium is a plant (popularly known as Isabghol) whose parts such as seeds and others are used to prepare some Pharmacy Products specially laxative medicines.
The authority confirmed that Psyllium Husk powder as per notification number 1/2017 Central tax (Rate) dated 28.6 2017 is covered under serial number 73 of schedule 1 of the said notification attracting GST @ 5% the relevant entry in respect of it is as under-
S.No. Chapter Heading/Sub Heading/Tariff Item Description of Goods
73 1211 Plant and parts of plant (including seeds and fruits) of a kind used primarily in perfumery in pharmacy or for insecticidal fungicidal or similar purpose, frozen a driven, whether or not crushed or powdered.
Pysllium is a plant which part is crushed in powder form to prepare a pharmaceutical product. The notification explicitly matches the preparation process undertaken by the applicant and moreover, CBSE issued clarification in form of FAQs vide F.No.332/2/2017-TRU in December 2017 regarding classification and rate of GST on psyllium husk and seeds which prescribed rate i.e. 5%
The applicant has contested that as the classification and rate of GST is not mentioned anyway notification number 1/2017, therefore the classification will fall under the residual entry of serial number 453 of schedule III of set notification which is not valid.
Decision: The Rajasthan AAR has pronounced the ruling that Psyllium Plant or its parts is classifiable under HSN 12119032 and attracts GST @ 5% as provided under Notification No. 1/2017 central tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
Conclusion: The applicant has produced invoices wherein they were charging 18% stating that the product is not expressly specified in the rate notifications. But AAR has outlined the judgement of Honourable Supreme court in the case of Dunlop India Ltd. and Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. wherein it was said that product specific entry cannot be overridden by general/residual entry.
 Prepared by CA Akanksha Bohra
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com