Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Study/2018-19/138
06 December 2018

The issue involved in this case is that A.The applicability of a notification no. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate) dt.28.06.2017., issued under the provision of this Act; B. Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;


M/s Pawanputra Travels, ADVANCE RULING NO.RAJ/AAR/2018-19/24  dated 02.11.2018
Prepared by CA Preksha Jain and Himanshu Bhimani

Introduction:-The compendious of the case is that , M/s PAWANPUTRA TRAVELS., having GSTIN registration number 08AAIFP7583M1ZE, (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) is providing both air conditioned and non- air-conditioned vehicles on hire to the Indian Army. The applicant has raised invoices on Indian Army by charging GST on all types of vehicles (air conditioned and non-air conditioned) supplied by them. However, the Indian Army has not reimbursed GST amount on non-air conditioned vehicles provided by them on the grounds that no GST is payable on non-air conditioned contact carriage as per serial no.15 of exemption notification no.12/2017-central tax (Rate) dt.28.06.2017. The applicant has also submitted a letter dt.31.05.2018 regarding return of invoices wherein GST has been charged by the applicant on non-air conditioned vehicles.

Relevant Legal Provisions:
  • Section 11 of the CGST Act,2017.
  • Notification no. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate) dt.28.06.2017.
  • Clause (7) of section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
  • Section 2(25) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
  • Section 2(22) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
  •  Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act 2017.
 
Issue Involved: 
The issue involved in this case is that  
  1. The applicability of a notification no. 12/2017 Central tax (Rate) dt.28.06.2017., issued under the provision of this Act;
  2.  Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both;
 
Assessee’s Contention:
  1. The applicant submits that there is exemption with respect to transportation of services by a non-air conditioned contract carriage vide serial no. 15 of the exemption notification no. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 which reads as follows:-
S. No. Chapter, Section, Heading, Group or Service Code (Tariff) Description of Services Rate (%) Condition
15 Heading 9964 Transport of passengers, with or without accompanied belongings, by –
(a) air, embarking from or terminating in an airport located in the state of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, or Tripura or at Bagdogra located in West Bengal;
(b) non-airconditioned contract carriage other than radio taxi, for transportation of passengers, excluding tourism, conducted tour, charter or hire; or
(c) stage carriage other than air-conditioned stage carriage.
Nil Nil
 
It is pertinent to mention that it is provided that the meaning of ‘contract carriage’ will have the same meaning as assigned to it in clause (7) of section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which states that-
“contract carriage” means a motor vehicle which carries a passenger or passengers for hire or reward and is engaged under a contract, whether expressed or implied, for the use of such vehicle as a whole for the carriage of passengers mentioned therein and entered into by a person with a holder of a permit in relation to such vehicle or any person authorized by him in this behalf on a fixed or an agreed rate or sum—
(a) on a time basis, whether or not with reference to any route or distance; or
(b) from one point to another, and in either case, without stopping to pick up or set down passengers not included in the contract anywhere during the journey, and includes—
(i) a maxicab; and
(ii) a motorcab notwithstanding the separate fares are charged for its passengers;
It is submitted that they neither satisfy the condition prescribed in clause (a) nor specified in clause (b) and accordingly, in their view, they cannot be considered as ‘non-air conditioned contract carriage’ eligible for exemption under the serial no. 15 of the exemption notification no. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. However, the service receiver in their case is contending that they are covered by the exemption notification and no GST is payable to the government. Therefore, the applicant request to kindly examine whether they are eligible for claiming the benefit of exemption contained at serial no. 15 of the exemption notification no. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 or not. 
  1. The applicant further submits that the amount of GST paid by them on the non air conditioned motor vehicles supplied to the Indian Army has not been reimbursed to them and the invoices raised by the applicant have been returned vide letter dated 31.05.2018. The applicant submits that it was mentioned in the letter dated 31.05.2018 that GST is not applicable on non air conditioned contract carriage and document issued by the Headquarters of Ministry of Defence (Army) was also provided to the applicant. The classification of vehicles as per DG OL & Motor Vehicle Act issued by the Headquarters of Ministry of Defence (Army) clearly mentions nil rate of GST on non air conditioned vehicles. Hence, the applicant requests to kindly pronounce decision as regards classification issued by the Headquarters of Ministry of Defence (Army) with respect to non air conditioned light motor vehicles supplied by them and the applicable rate of GST on such vehicles.
  2. The applicant further submits that they have already paid GST on the supply of non-air conditioned motor vehicles supplied by them on hire to Indian Army but the service receiver is not reimbursing them the amount of GST on the grounds that the supply is covered by absolute exemption under serial no. 15 of the exemption notification no. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017. In this regard, the applicant submits that GST is indirect taxation, the burden of which is to be borne by the recipient. It is also pertinent to mention that as per Explanation to section 11 of the CGST Act, 2017, in case where there is absolute exemption granted by the government, the registered person is not supposed to collect GST from the buyers/receivers. The said section is produced for the sake of convenient reference as follows:-
11. (1) Where the Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, it may, on the recommendations of the Council, by notification, exempt generally, either absolutely or subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, goods or services or both of any specified description from the whole or any part of the tax leviable thereon with effect from such date as may be specified in such notification.
(2) Where the Government is satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, it may, on the recommendations of the Council, by special order in each case, under circumstances of an exceptional nature to be stated in such order, exempt from payment of tax any goods or services or both on which tax is leviable.
(3) The Government may, if it considers necessary or expedient so to do for the purpose of clarifying the scope or applicability of any notification issued under sub-section (1) or order issued under sub-section (2), insert an explanation in such notification or order, as the case may be, by notification
 at any time within one year of issue of the notification under sub-section (1) or order under sub-section (2), and every such explanation shall have effect as if it had always been the part of the first such notification or order, as the case may be.
Explanation:-For the purposes of this section, where an exemption in respect of any goods or services or both from the whole or part of the tax leviable thereon has been granted absolutely, the registered person supplying such goods or services or both shall not collect the tax, in excess of the effective rate, on such supply of goods or services or both.
The applicant submits that the exemption under notification no. 12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 has been granted in exercise of the powers conferred under section 11(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and so it is very important to ascertain the applicability of exemption notification in the present case as if the exemption is admissible in the present case, they cannot collect GST from their service receiver. Therefore, decision should be given as regards applicability of exemption notification in the present case so that the applicant is able to correctly determine its tax liability.
 
Reasoning adopted by the tribunal: - Theauthority contented that the applicant does not satisfy the condition as prescribed in clause (a) nor specified in clause (b) of clause (7) of section 2 of the motor Vehicles Act, 1988 as defined above.
Thus, the essential ingredient of a contract carriage is that it plies under a contract for a fixed set of passengers, and does not allow any other passenger to board or alight from the carriage at will. A ‘contract carriage’ carries passengers as a group and cannot pick up passengers en-route.
Even if the contract is assumed as ‘non-air-conditioned contract carriage’, even then, serial no.15 of the exemption notification no.12/2017 Central Tax(Rate) dt.28.06.2017 does not exempt it from GST, as specifically mentioned in the said notification.
It is hence concluded that the service provided by the applicant falls under ‘rent a cab’ service which attracts two rates i.e.
 
1. IGST @ 5% (CGST @ 2.5 % and SGST @ 2.5 %) without ITC credit.
 
2. IGST @ 12% (CGST @ 6 % and SGST @ 6 %) with ITC credit.

Conclusion
On the basis of above discussions it is now clear that the applicant can’t take the benefit of the notification no.12/2017-central tax (rate) dt.28.06.2017 as this service does not fall under ‘non-air conditioned contract carriage’ category. The service provided is ‘rent a cab’ which attracts IGST @ 5%(CGST @ 2.5% and SGST @ 2.5%) provided that credit of input tax charged on goods and services used in supplying the service, other than the input tax credit of input service in the same line of business (i.e. service procured from another service provider of transporting passengers in a motor vehicle or renting of a motor vehicle) has not been taken or IGST@12% (CGST@ 6% and SGST @ 6%) if input tax credit is availed.
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com