Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE STUDY/2011-12/06
11 May 2011

Levy of Service Tax
 
PJ/Case Study/2011-12/06  

CASE STUDY

Prepared By:
CA Pradeep Jain and
Sukhvinder Kaur, LLB [FYIC]

 

Introduction: -
 
For levying service tax on a service provided by the assessee, it is first required to see whether such service is classified as a taxable service under the Finance Act, 1994. Thereafter, it is required to be seen that whether the service sought to be taxed fulfills the criteria prescribed under the provisions for the specified service. Only then the service provided by an assessee can be taxed. The case under study also involves the similar question.
 
Relevant Legal Provisions:-
 
- Clarification by Ministry of Finance F. No. 345/4/97-TRU, dated 16.8.99:
 
“In other words service tax is attracted on advertising agencies which are providing service to advertising agencies which are providing service to advertisers by conceptualising, designing or preparing advertisements. Print or electronic media is excluded from the levy of service tax as they do not provide any service to the advertisers, but are merely selling space or time for the exhibition of advertisements.”
 
- Relevant extract from Circular No. 96/7/2007-ST dated 23.8.2007:
 
Issue:  Persons / agencies canvass advertisements for publishing, on commission basis. Such persons / agencies do not provide any other services like making, preparation, display or exhibition of advertisement. Whether merely canvassing advertisement for publishing on a commission basis by persons / agencies is classifiable as Advertising Agency service [section 65(105)(e)] or not?
 
Clarification: Merely canvassing advertisements for publishing, on commission basis, is not classifiable under the taxable service falling under section 65(105)(e). Such services are liable to service tax under business auxiliary service [section 65(105)(zzb)].
- Notification No. 6/2005-ST:
          
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994) (hereinafter referred to as the said Finance Act), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts taxable services of aggregate value not exceeding four lakh rupees in any financial year from the whole of the service tax leviable thereon under section 66 of the said Finance Act:
          
Provided that nothing contained in this notification shall apply to,-
          
(i) taxable services provided by a person under a brand name or trade name, whether registered or not, of another person; or
         
(ii) such value of taxable services in respect of which service tax shall be paid by such person and in such manner as specified under sub-section (2) of section 68 of the said Finance Act read with Service Tax Rules,1994.
            
- Notification No. 8/2008-ST says -
 
In the said notification, for the words “eight lakh rupees”, wherever they occur, the words “ten lakh rupees” shall be substituted.
 
2. This notification shall come into force on the 1st day of April, 2008.
 

In the matter of M/s Ganpati ADD Media, Jodhpur
[Order-In-Original no. 10/ST/2011, dated: 17.01.2011]

Brief facts of the case: -
 
-           Noticee is providing cable operator services. It works on commission basis for M/s Sky Media Pvt Limited.
 
-           Department alleged that during the period from 2008-09 to 2009-10 the noticee had provided Advertisement Service to M/s Den Sky Media Pvt Limited. And received consideration for the same but the noticee did not pay service tax nor applied for registration.
 
-           Show cause notice was issued to the Noticee demanding service tax with interest on the said consideration. Penalty under Section 76 was also proposed to be imposed.
 
Noticee’s Contentions: -
 
- Noticee contended that they were not providing any advertising services, they were just booking space and time for the customers and for which they received commission. Reliance was placed on Board Circular F. No. 345/4/97-TRU, Dated 16.8.99 and it was submitted that the print media and electronic media that just sells space and time for the advertisement are excluded from the levy of service tax.
 
- Further, reliance was placed on clarification about the issue in Circular no. 96/7/2007-ST dated 23.8.2007 and submitted that the above circular also clarified that merely if the advertisement is canvassed on commission basis it will not be classified under the category of Advertising Agency services but under the head ‘Business Auxiliary Services’.
 
- It was submitted that the Noticee were also engaged in just booking the space and time for their customers. The services of the advertisement were provided by DEN Sky Media. Noticee just received a fixed percentage of commission for per advertisement booking. Therefore the show cause notice that is issued to them was totally erroneous, as the Noticee were not taxable under the category of service for which the show cause notice has been issued.
 
- Further to support their contention that the Noticee were not covered under the head Advertisement services and were covered under the category of Business Auxiliary service, reliance was placed on following decisions: 
 

  • C.S.T., AHMEDABAD Versus POORNIMA ADVERTISING & PROMOTION PVT. LTD. [2010 (20) S.T.R. 107 (Tri. - Ahmd.)]
  • IN RE: ABLE ADDS PVT. LTD. [2005 (187) E.L.T. 133 (Commr. Appl.)]
  • IN RE: PRECIOUS PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. [2006 (1) S.T.R. 64 (Commr. Appl.)]

It was submitted that all the cases produced above say that mere booking of space and time for the customer and passing the same to its publisher on commission basis is not classified under the head Advertising agency service. The service is to be classified under the head business auxiliary service.
 
- Further, it was submitted that the demand raised on the Noticee was on the whole amount of the bills. They were working on commission basis. The amount that was charged in the bill was passed on to the advertising agency. Invoices were produced to show that they were issued by Den Sky Media Network Ltd. It was submitted that from the said Invoices it was clear that the Noticee were getting just the 15% trade discount. On the rest of the amount on which service tax has been charged by the party and it has been paid by the said service provider. So the only amount on which the service tax is to be paid by the Noticee was only the amount of commission received by them. As per invoice, the commission received by them is 15% only. Thus, the department can also raise the demand of service tax on that 15% commission earned only.  Further to support their contention, Noticee relied on the following decisions- 

  • FIFTH ESTATE COMMUNICATIONS (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI [2008 (12) S.T.R. 352 (Tri. - Chennai)]
  • MOULIS ADVERTISING SERVICES P. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF S.T., CHENNAI [2008 (12) S.T.R. 225 (Tri. - Chennai)]

From the above reproduced citations it was also clear that the service tax liability in case of booking of space and time on behalf of the client is only of the commission earned by the agency. Therefore the show cause notice issued to the Noticee demanding the service tax on the whole amount of the bill is wholly and totally erroneous and is liable to be set aside. Even all the advertising agencies, all over India and even in your good honour’s jurisdiction are paying service tax only on commission received from newspapers. 
 
- Further, it was submitted that the Noticee have earned the total amount of commission @ 15% as stated earlier also. Even out of this commission, certain portion is to be passed on to the clients. The amount charged from client is chargeable to service tax.  As the Noticee have to pass on maximum part of this commission to the buyer then the service tax should be charged on this realised amount only. This could be better understood with an example.
 
Example: Suppose the total advertising agency charges are Rs. 1000/-. Out of this thousand rupees 150 is commission (@15%). So the service tax is already paid on the balance amount i.e. Rs. 850/-. We have to bill the customer along with the service tax. The amount will be charged with 150+850+87.55, but as the customer is aware that we are earning commission @ 15%,  he ask for discount from the same. Suppose we pass on the discount @ 10%.  The service tax can be charged only on rest of the amount.
 
Further to support our contention appellant relied on LINTAS INDIA (P) LTD.Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, DELHI [2008 (10) S.T.R. 474 (Tri. - Del.)]
 
In the above case also it has been said that the discount given to the customers cannot be said as commission earned by the assessee. The same decision applies in Noticee’s case also and therefore they were liable to pay service tax only on the commission that has been earned by them.
 
- It was submitted that even if the contention of the department is accepted, which is not the case, then the Noticee have to pay the service tax on the whole amount. In that case, they will get the credit of the amount that has been paid by Den Sky Media Network Pvt. Ltd. The same has been also said in the case of PURNIMA ADVERTISING AGENCY P. LTD. Versus COMMR. OF S. T., AHMEDABAD [2010 (19) S.T.R. 723 (Tri. - Ahmd.)]
          
Therefore, the Noticee will get the credit on invoices. The invoices along with statement were enclosed to their reply. This clearly shows that the service tax is paid on all the invoices. Hence, the credit should be allowed to the Noticee on all these invoices. Hence, the demand will be reduced by that amount. 
 
- It was further submitted that the amount that has been received by the Noticee is the amount including service tax. Therefore if the contention of the department is accepted that the service tax has to be paid by them then the amount will be cum duty and service tax will be calculated accordingly. The same has also been held in - 

  • IN RE: ABLE ADDS PVT. LTD. [2005 (187) E.L.T. 133 (Commr. Appl.)]         
  • IN RE: PRECIOUS PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. [2006 (1) S.T.R. 64 (Commr. Appl.)]                      

Therefore if the department contention is also accepted then the 15% commission is the amount including service tax. So the tax will be excluded while calculating the amount liable for service tax under the Service Tax Act, 1994 applying the above mentioned decisions in Noticee’s case.
  
- It was further submitted that the show cause notice has been issued charging service tax at the rate of 12.36% for the demand of the period 2008-09 and 2009-10. But the rate of service tax applicable from 24.2.2009 was 10.30%. The show cause notice also covers a period beyond 24.2.2009. But the rate that is taken for calculating the demand of service tax is 12.36%. Hence the demand calculated is totally erroneous and such an erroneous shoe cause notice is liable to be set aside.
 
- Further, it was submitted that the amount that has been taken in the show cause notice for calculating the service tax demand is Billed amount + 10%+ 10%. But as the Noticee is contending from the beginning that the amount billed is already paid to Den Sky Media Pvt. Ltd. and the service tax liability on the same has to be discharged by them only. Therefore the amount on which service tax can be demanded is 15% commission. But the department is adding 10%+ 10% on billed amount +10%. The maximum commission earned is 15% so the department asking for service tax on more than 15% is totally erroneous and is liable to be set aside. It is further submitted that how this amount of 10%+ 10% has been arrived by the department is not known to them. Normally, all the agencies charge the same amount that is billed to them. Only the commission given by newspaper agency is their income. Hence, the show cause notice is totally erroneous and liable to be set aside.
 
- Further, it was submitted that if the department’s contention is accepted, which is not the case, then also the Noticee cannot be denied the benefit SSI exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST. The limit of 4 lacs was enhanced and is at present 4 lakhs vide Notification No. 8/2008-ST.
           
It was submitted that since the aggregate value of taxable services in the show cause notice itself is less than the exemption limit, hence the same is applicable to the Noticee. Therefore the benefit of the above notification will be applied in their case also. As the total value on which service tax is demanded in show cause notice is 622652 for the year 2008-09 and 262134 for the year 2009-10 i.e. not crossing the trash hold limit of 10 lacs, service tax cannot be demanded from them. Furthermore, if we see the commission amount only then it is very much below the exemption limit.
 
- It was submitted that the show cause notice has been issued saying that the Noticee were engaged in providing service namely “Advertisement and Cable Operator Services” under sub clause (90a) of Section 65 of the Finance Act, 199. The clause 90a of the Section 65 defines Renting of immovable property. Therefore the show cause notice issued to the assessee is totally wrong in classification of service and mentioning its section.
 
- The show cause notice also imposes interest under Section 75 of the Service Tax Act, 1994. It was submitted that the section says that if some provisions are not complied with then the interest also has to be paid to the Govt. with the demand of tax. As the demand of service tax raised on the Noticee is also not sustainable the demand of interest under the show cause notice is totally erroneous.
 
- Further, it was submitted that the penalty is also imposed on the Noticee for contravention of the provisions of Section 67 to Section 70. The Section 67 is for valuation of taxable services for charging service tax, 68 for Payment of service tax, 69 for registration and 70 for Furnishing of return. As the Noticee had not crossed the limit of Rs. 10 lacs for the year ending 2009 and 2010, they had not violated any of the provisions of these sections. There was no need for the Noticee to take registration, pay tax or to file the returns. Therefore penalty cannot be imposed on them. The show cause notice therefore should be set aside. 
 
Findings of the Deputy Commissioner: -
 
The Deputy Commissioner held as under:
 
- It was held that the service provided by Noticee on commission basis to M/s Den Sky Media Net Works P. Ltd cannot be termed as Advertisement services as the Noticee was not designing or preparing advertisement. Moreover, the clarification of Ministry F. No. 345/4/97-TRU dated 16.08.1999, M/s Den Sky Media Net Works P. Ltd which is an Electronic media is excluded from levy of service tax as merely selling space or time for exhibition of advertisement is not covered under Advertisement service so as clarified vide Circular No. 96/7/2007-ST dated 23.08.2007 this service falls in the category of Business Auxiliary Service (Section 65(105)(22b).
 
- It was further held that the Noticee is entitled to avail the exemption of Rs. 10 lakhs as provided under Notification No. 6/2005-ST as amended vide Notification No. 8/2008-ST. It was held that the Department has arrived at the notional gross consideration figures by adding 10% as Administrative Expenses plus 10% Profit to the amount billed by M/s Den Sky Media P. Ltd.
 
- It was further held that since consideration received in 2007-08 was less than Rs. 8 lakhs so in the year 2008-09 the Noticee is entitled to avail Notification No. 6/2005-St and in the same way it is entitled to avail full exemption in the year 2009-10 as its proceeds in the year 2008-09 & 2009-10 was less than Rs. 10 lakhs limit. So it is very much entitled to avail exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST as it neither provided Branded Service not was covered under exclusion clause contained in Para (ii) of Notification No. 6/2005-ST as the noticee is not providing any service other than Business Auxiliary services as discussed above.
 
- It was held that the Noticee did not provide service of Cable Operator and Advertising service.
 
Decision of the Deputy Commissioner:-
 
The proceedings initiated by the impugned show cause notice were dropped.
 
Conclusion:-
 
The learned Adjudicating Authority rightly set aside the demand and held that when electronic media was excluded from levy of service tax then service tax cannot be demanded merely for selling space or time for exhibition of advertisement especially when the Noticee were not designing or preparing the advertisement. 

******

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com