Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Study/2020-21/154
16 May 2020

Does Mehandi/Henna powder fall under Chapter 33 or under chapter 14?
Case: M/s Sunil Kumar Gehlot (AAR No. RAJ/AAR/2020-21/01)
Introduction: M/s Sunil Kumar Gehlot is engaged in manufacture of hair dye powder and registered under GST.
 
Issue involved: Does Mehandi/Henna powder fall under Chapter 33 or under chapter 14?
Brief Facts: M/s Sunil Kumar Gehlot is engaged in manufacture of hair dye powder and registered under GST. The applicant intends to manufacture mehandi/henna powder in future and so clarification is required on classification and rate of the tax applicable.
 
Assessee’s Contention:
The assesse has contended in the following manner
  1. The present application for advance ruling has been filed to confirm the classification of henna powder and the rate of GST applicable thereon. In order to arrive at perfect conclusion, it is pertinent to make reference to various aspects that aid in the classification of their product henna powder under GST regime.
At the outset, it is worth noting that while filing application for registration under GST Laws, the list of goods mentions the Chapter 14 for henna powder. The HSN code no. 14041019 specifically mentions “Henna Powder” and so the applicant has mentioned the classification of their product henna powder under chapter 14 and accordingly, the rate of GST applicable is 5%. The applicant submits that when the GST portal itself specifies the HSN code for henna powder as 14041019, there is no doubt that the said product is covered under chapter 33. Therefore, the classification of the product mehandi/henna powder should be confirmed under HSN code 14041019.
In continuation to the above, reference may be made to amendment made vide insertion of serial no. 78A by Notification No. 06/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018 which amended the principal notification no. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 which reads as follows:-
78A 1404 or 3305 Mehandi paste in cones
 
The applicant submits that after the above cited amendment, it is being interpreted that the above amendment is specific for Mehandi paste in cones and cannot be considered with reference to mehandi powder. In this regard, the applicant submits that the rate of GST applicable on henna powder was 5% since inception and this fact is confirmed by the Agenda Item No. 10 of the issues recommended by the Fitment Committee for the consideration of the GST Council. The extracts from the Agenda Item are produced for the sake of convenient reference as follows:-
 
S. No. Description HSN Present GST Rate Recommended GST rate Comments of the Fitment Committee
13. Mehandi paste in cones 3305/1404 18% 5%
  1. Henna powder falling under heading 1404 attracts 5% GST.
  2. Henna used as preparation for hair is classified under heading 3305 and attracts GST at the rate of 18%.
  3. To avoid disputes, fitment committee recommends 5% GST rate for mehandi paste in cones.
 
We submit that the above extracts clearly indicate that as far as product mehandi/henna powder is concerned, there is no doubt that the said product is classifiable under chapter 14 with applicable GST rate of 5%. Therefore, in light of the above cited extracts, which are relevant in the present case, the classification should be confirmed under HSN code 1404 with GST rate of 5%.
Decision:The tariff items 14041011 to 14041090 has already been omitted from the Custom Tariff Act, 1975 vide the finance act,2006( no.21 of 2006 ) dated 18.04.2006 and hence no such tariff item is available in Customs Tariff Act,1975.
We further observe that it is well known fact that Henna/Mehendi powder has a natural property of dye/tanning and is generally as hair dye. Therefore,we observe that the product is rightly classifiable under chapter heading 3305 as preparations for use on the hair and covered under amended Notification no. 41/2017-Central tax dated 14.11.2017 and attract 18% GST.
The Rajasthan AAR has ruled that Mehendi/Henna powder is covered under Chapter 33 and will attract GST @ 18%.
Conclusion: The classification dispute as regards mehandi/henna powder was prevalent since Central Excise Laws and the confusion still persists in GST regime. The amendments made in the notifications specifying rate of GST creates dispute as regards classification of henna powder in the GST regime.
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com