Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE STUDY/2010-11/12
16 July 2010

Deposition of service tax under wrong head

 

PJ/Case Study/2010-11/12

 

 

Case Study

 

Prepared By:

CA Pradeep Jain

Parag Ghate, B.Com and

Sukhvinder Kaur, LLB [FYIC]

 

Introduction:

 

In the case under study, the assessee had deposited the service tax which he was liable to pay but under a wrong head. Therefore, can the amount of service tax should be recovered from him alongwith interest and penalty should be imposed on him is the issue involved in this case.

 

Relevant Legal Provisions:

 

Board Circular No. 58/07/2003-CX(ST), dated 20/05/2003

Using of wrong Accounting Code for payment of Service Tax clarification

I am directed to say that a representation had been received by the Board raising apprehensions regarding using a wrong Accounting Code for payment of Service Tax. Whether this amounts to having paid the Service Tax or not.

2. The Board has examined the issue. In this connection, I am directed to clarify that the assessee need not be asked to pay the service tax again. In such cases the matter should be sorted with the P.A.O. As regards to the cases where the assessee was asked to pay service tax again, the amount thus paid may be refunded by the concerned divisional Asstt. Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner.

3. The field formations may suitably be informed.

4. Trade Notice may be issued for the information of the trade.

F. No. 159/2/2003-CX.4

 

In the matter of The Thar Dry Port

[Order-in-Original No. 507/ST/2009-10 dated 18/06/2010]

 

Brief Facts:

 

-     Noticee is engaged in providing Cargo Handling Service, Business Auxiliary Services and Storage & Warehousing Services.

 

-     Noticee filed ST-3 Returns for the half year ending 30.09.2005 to 30.09.2004 on 24.10.2005. Thus, there was delay in filing ST-3 Returns.

 

-     Department checked the ST-3 Return and alleged that the Noticee had not paid the service tax of Rs. 1960/- on Business Auxiliary Services; service tax of Rs 9218/- on Cargo Handling Services alongwith interest of Rs. 1301/- for this delay deposited. The deposit of service tax & interest was provisionally made under Cargo Handling Services. Also, it was alleged that the noticee short paid service tax of Rs. 95303/- on Storage & Warehousing services.

 

-     Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the noticee demanding the amount of service tax short paid on Storage & Warehousing Services, on Business Auxiliary Services and on Cargo Handling services. Penalty was also proposed to be imposed.

 

Noticee’s Contention:

 

Noticee had submitted following contentions in their defence: -

 

¨              Noticee contended that they had deposited the complete amount of service tax along with interest. It was due to a mistake the service tax was deposited under the head “Cargo Handling Service”. But in actuality they had deposited the complete tax along with the interest to the Government. Accordingly, it was requested to adjust the amount.

 

¨              Noticee relied upon the Board Circular no. 58/07/2003-CX (ST) dt. 20.05.03 in this regard. The Board in this Circular had clarified that the assessee needs not to be asked to deposit the tax again.

 

¨              With regard to the second allegation in the show cause notice was that the noticee had not gotten the Registration amended and that they have not included all the services provided by them in registration certificate, the Noticee submitted that they have applied for the amendment in the Registration certificate and same has been done by the department. They have enclosed the amended Registration certificate to support their stand.

 

¨              It was further submitted that this was a procedural mistake and therefore, must be condoned.

 

¨              They also submitted that the interest was deposited by them to the department and as such the penalty should not be imposed.

 

¨              Noticee further submitted that they have deposited the tax alongwith the interest before issuance of show cause notice and as such the penalty should not be imposed. They have placed reliance on the decision of the Tribunal in case of Mass Marketing & Advertising Services Pvt. Ltd. v/s C.C.E. Bangalore [2006 (3) S.T.R 333] wherein the penalty was waived when the tax and penalty was paid before issue of show cause notice. Accordingly, Noticee has also submitted that the penalty in their case should also be waived.

 

Issue Involved:

 

The issued involved in this matter is

 

Whether the Noticee has discharged the service tax liability? What is the correct amount of service tax liability?

 

Whether payment of service tax under wrong head would amount to short payment of service tax and would attract penalty?

 

Order of the Adjudicating Authority:

 

The Adjudicating Authority held as under:

 

Ø             It was observed that the Noticee had provisionally deposited Rs. 160971/- vide TR6 Challan dated 17.2.05 (Rs. 33006/- and Rs. 127974/-) for the period from April, 2002 to Sept., 2004. and the show cause notice was relating to the period ending March., 04 and the liability as per the same was Rs. 106481/- . Thus, it was held that there is excess deposit of Rs. 43977/- (160977 – 106481 service tax – 9218 – 1301 interest) relating to half year ending April, 04 to Sept, 04 which is not covered in show cause notice.

 

Ø             The Adjudicating Authority held that in view of provisions of Circular No. 58/07/2003-CX (ST) dated 20.5.2003 relied upon by the Noticee, they could not ask the Noticee to deposit service tax again on classification of service ground.

 

Ø             It was further held that since the noticee had deposited the demanded service tax alongwith interest so the Adjudicating Authority refrained from imposing any penalty and the provisional deposit for Rs. 160977/- is appropriated in the Government account.

 

Decision of the Adjudicating Authority:

 

The Adjudicating Authority dropped the proceedings initiated against the Noticee.

 

Conclusion:

 

When the service tax has been deposited but under a wrong head, then it cannot be said that there is short payment of service tax and the said amount cannot be demanded again. Otherwise, it will result in the assessee bearing loss on account of double payment. The Adjudicating Authority rightly dropped the proceedings on the basis of Board circular issued in this regard.

 

Also, when the amount of service tax alongwith interest has been deposited before the issuance of show cause notice, then penalty should not be imposed on the assessee and this relaxation should be extended to the assessee.

 

********

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com