Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case law/2014-15/2282

Whether welding electrodes used in repair and maintenance of plant and machinery are eligible for credit as capital goods?

Case:-M/s CENTURY CEMENT Vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIPUR
 
Citation:-2014-TIOL-1535-CESTAT-DEL
 
Brief facts:- Question involved in the dispute is whether welding electrodes used in the repair and maintenance of plant and machinery are eligible capital goods for the purpose of Cenvat credit or not.
 
Appellant’s contentions:-The appellant have strongly contended that credit on repair and maintenance of welding electrodes is available and in support of it, they have relied upon the following decisions:
 
1.    Hindustan Zinc Ltd. vs. Union of India [2008 (228) ELT 517 (Raj) = 2008-TIOL-408-HC-RAJ CX];
2.    CCE, Bangalore vs. Alfred Herbert (India) Ltd. [2010 (257) ELT 29 (Kar) = 2010-TIOL-427-HKA R -CX];
3.    Panipat Co-operative sugar Mills Ltd. vs. CCE, Rohtak [2013 (293) ELT 66 (Tri-Del)];
4.    Triveni Engg. & Ind. Ltd. vs. CCE, Meerut I Final Order No. A/56117-56118/2013-SM (BR) dated 28.3.13.
 
Respondent’s contentions:-Learned DR appearing for the Revenue, have referred to the decision of the Tribunal in the case of SAIL vs. CCE, Ranchi [2008 (222) ELT 233 (Tri-Kol) = 2007-TIOL-2272-CESTAT-RANCHI] as confirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in [2002 (139) ELT A 294 (SC)]. Further, itstand brought to our notice that Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Sree Rayalaseema Hi-Strength Hypo Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Tirupati [2012 (278) ELT 167 (AP)] has held that repair and maintenance is an activity distinctfrom manufacture and the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Grasim Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India [2011 (273) ELT 10 (SC) = 2011- TIOL-100-SC-CX] has held that scrap and waste that arise from repair and maintenance is not excisable as same is neither by-product nor thefinal product or subsidiary product as repair and maintenance activity is not a manufacture.
 
Reasoning of judgment:-The Hon’ble court find that the above decisions are considered by the Tribunal in the case of Triveni Engg. & Ind. Ltd. vs. CCE, Meerut I and after noting the various decisions, it was held that dismissal of SLP by the Hon'ble Supreme Court against the order of the Tribunal in the case of SAIL without going into the reasons does not lay down any law. They further note that the identical dispute was decided in a recent decision of the Tribunal in the case of The Kanoria Sugar and General Manufacturing Company Ltd. vide its final order No. 56645/2013 wherein all the rival decisions have been taken note and it stands observed as under:-
 
"5. I have considered the submissions from both the sides and perused the records. There is no dispute that the welding electrodes in question have been used for repair & maintenance of plant and machinery. It is also not disputed that regular repair & maintenance of plant and machinery of a Sugar Mills is an essential activity. They have considered the submissions from both the sides and perused the records. There is no dispute that the welding electrodes in question have been used for repair & maintenance of plant and machinery. It is also not disputed that regular repair & maintenance of plant and machinery of a Sugar Mills is an essential activity.
 
6. The definition of 'input' during the period of dispute, as given in Rule 2 (k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules'2004, covered- "all goods except Light Diesel Oil, HSD and Motor Spirit commonly known as petrol, used in or in relation to manufacture of final products whether directly or indirectly and whether contained in the final product or not and includes". The expression "used in or in relation to manufacture of final products whether directly or indirectly" is obviously wider in scope than expression "used in the manufacture of', as the expression "in or in relation to" expands scope of the expression "used in the manufacture of'. Apex Court in the case of J.K.Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Kanapur reported in 1997(91) WLT-34 (SC) = 2002-TIOL-116-SC-CT-LB while interpreting the scope of the expression "used in the manufacture of" in Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, has held as under:-
 
 "In our judgment if a process or activity is so integrally related to the ultimate manufacture of goods so that without that process of activity manufacture may, even if theoretically possible, be commercially in-expedient, goods intended for use in the process or activity, as specified in Rule 13 will qualify for special treatment. This is not to say that every category of goods used "in connection with" manufacture or in relation to manufacture or which facilitates the conduct of manufacture will be included within Rule 13. Attention in this connection may be invited to a judgment of this Court in which it was held that vehicles used by a company (which mined ore and turned out copper in carrying an activities as a miner and as a manufacturer) fell within Rule 13, even if the vehicles were used merely for removing ore from to the mines to the factory, and finished goods from the factory to the place of storage. Spare parts and accessories required for effective operation of those vehicles were also held to fall within Rule 13, See Indian Copper Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar CA No. 1021 of 1969 dt 19.10.1964".
 
Thus, in term of the above judgment of the Apex Court the goods used in an activity, without which manufacturing, operations, though theoretically possible, are not commercially feasible, have to be treated as, "used in the manufacture of the final products".
 
When the Apex Court has interpreted the expression "used in manufacture" in the above manner, the scope of the expression "used in or in relation to manufacture whether directly or indirectly" would be much wider. The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in case of Singh Alloys & Steel Ltd. Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Excise reported in 1993(66) ELT-594(Cal.) has held that the definition of "input" was not depend on what ought to be used or what was commercially expedient to use and the expression "in relation to" used in Explanation to Rule 57A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 has a wide connotation. Therefore, in my view for determining the eligibility of a particular item for Cenvat Credit, what has to be seen was as to whether without use of that item or without the activity in which that item was used, the manufacture of final product, though theoretically feasible, was commercially expedient or possible or not. It was nobody's case that manufacturing activity was commercially feasible with malfunctioning machinery, leaking pipes, tubes and tanks. Therefore repair and maintenance of plant and machinery, though by itself not a manufacturing activity, has to be treated as an activity in relation to manufacture and inputs used in repair & maintenance would have to be treated as goods used in relation to manufacture.
 
Moreover I find that Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in case of Ambuja Cement Eastern Ltd. (Supra) has held that welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery eligible for Cenvat Credit. In this case Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court has also discussed the judgment of Tribunal in the case of M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Ranchi reported in 2008(222) ELT-233 (Tri. Kolkata) the SLP filed by SAIL against which has been dismissed by the Apex Court and has observed that mere dismissal of SLP without giving any reason does not lay down any law. Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. reported in 2008(228) ELT-517 (Raj.) = 2008-TIOL-408-HCRAJ-CXand Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in case of Alfred Herbert (India) Ltd. reported in 2010(257) ELT-29 (Kar) = 2010-TIOL-427-HC-KAR-CXhas also held that the goods used for repair & maintenance of plant and machinery are eligible for Cenvat Credit.
 
Though Apex Court in case of Grasim Industries Ltd. reported in 2011 (273) ELT- 10 (SC) = 2011-TIOL-100-SC-CXhas held that repair & maintenance of machinery was not manufacture and therefore steal scrap, arising in course of the said activity was not excisable, this judgment does not help the Department, as for determining the eligibility for Cenvat Credit of an item used in an activity, what was relevant was as to whether without that activity in which the item, in question, was used, manufacturing operation were commercially feasible, and it was not relevant as to whether that activity by itself amounts manufacturer. In the case of Sree Rayalaseema Hi-Strength Hypo Ltd. reported in 2012(278) ELT-167(A.P.) decided by Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court, the point as to whether regular repair & maintenance of the plant and machinery by using welding electrodes, manufacturing operations, were commercially feasible, had not been considered. In any case, when three other high courts are mentioned above have held that welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of palant and machinery are eligible for Cenvat Credit, it was there judgments which will hold the field."
 
Inasmuch as the matter stand decided by the above decision, they find no justification for holding to the contrary. The appeal was accordingly allowed with consequential relief to the appellant by setting aside the impugned order.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed.

Comment:- The analogy of the case is that on account of various decisions, welding electrodes used for repair and maintenance of plant and machinery are eligible for Cenvat Credit.

{Prepared By :- Monika Tak}
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com