Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2016-17/3075

Whether value of ocean freight would be included in the taxable value of composite services when ocean fright is exempted from levy of service tax?

Case:APL LOGISTICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHENNAI-III
 
Citation:2014 (36) S.T.R. 1310 (Tri. - Chennai)
 
Brief Facts:The appellants are registered with the Service Tax authorities for rendering taxable services under Business Support Service, Business Auxiliary Service and Goods Transport Agency Service. In the present case, the appellants were providing mainly distribution of logistics support service to exporters/importers located in India.
The issue relates to as to whether value of ocean freight, advance manifest charges, bunkering and currency adjustment charges would be included in the taxable value. A show cause notice was issued proposing demand of tax of Rs. 1,47,15,967/- along with interest and penalty for the period from June, 2006 to December, 2008. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of tax along with interest and penalty.
Appellant’s Contention:The amount involving 95% of the demand is raised on ocean freight which is not taxable service. In this context, he relied on the following decisions :-
(a)        Agility Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. CST, Chennai - 2013-TIOL-162-CESTAT-MAD = 2014 (35)S.T.R. 858 (Tri.-Chen.)
(b)        Gudwin Logistics v. CCE, Vadodara - 2010 (18)S.T.R. 348 (Tri.-Ahmd.).
He drew the attention of the Bench to break-up of demand as ocean freight Rs. 1.16 crores, Bunker adjustment factor Rs. 25.15 lakhs and currency adjustment factor Rs. 5.82 lakhs approximately.
Respondent’s Contention:It is a composite service and the pre-dominating factor is logistics support service, which is covered under Business Support Service. He further submits that the appellant had not placed the invoice on ocean freight before the adjudicating authority. He submits that invoices contained in this appeal are related to the year 2010, whereas the period of dispute in this appeal is 2006-08. It is contended that the adjudicating authority rightly confirmed the demand of tax as per clause (b) of Section 65A(2) of the Finance Act, 1994.
 
Reasoning of Judgement: The adjudicating authority observed that it is a composite service including ocean freight, etc. It is also observed that the appellants are engaged in the managing, distribution and logistics, the cargo handling is only incidental to logistics and therefore, service provided by the appellant would be appropriately classifiable under “Business Support Service”. The Tribunal in the case of Agility Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (supra), held as under : -
“21. In the case of consideration received for freight we are of the prima facie view that ocean freight was not liable to Service Tax. While there are specific entries in Finance Act, 1994 levying tax on transportation of goods by road, rail, aircraft, pipeline, etc., there is no entry levying tax on transportation by sea. It has to be reasonably presumed that this is kept outside the tax net and it cannot be taxed under a general entry like Business Support Services. Further, it appears that such services are rendered in respect of export cargo.”
 
In the case of Gudwin Logistics (supra), the Tribunal held as under : -
“4………….At the same time we also take note of the fact that substantial portion of the total amount collected by the appellants relates to ocean freight which itself is not liable to Service Tax at all. The decision of the Tribunal in the case of DHL Lemuir Logistics Pvt. Ltd. relating to air freight is applicable to the facts of this case also and therefore the decision of the Commissioner that ocean freight also should be included for the purpose of Service Tax levy on the appellants prima facie appears to be wrong. Having regard to the nature of service provided by the appellants and also the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana, Board’s instructions and decision of the Tribunal - Bangalore Bench, we find that the appellants have made a strong prima facie in their favour. In view of the fact that there is a clear decision that freight element cannot be included for Service Tax, substantial portion of the demand does not appear to be sustainable. In view of the fact that the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana was not available to the Commissioner when the impugned order was passed and also the decision of the Bangalore Bench cited above was also not available to him, we consider it appropriate to set aside the impugned order and allow the stay petition and remand the matter to the Commissioner for fresh consideration after giving opportunity to the appellants to present their case.”
 
Ld. advocate submitted that they have mentioned ocean freight separately in their invoices. The sample invoice of 2010 placed by the appellant would show that “ocean freight” was mentioned separately. It is seen from the adjudication order that the ocean freight, advance manifest charges, bunkering charges (fuel adjustment charges due to variation in prices) and currency adjustment charges (due to fluctuation of foreign exchange rates) are all integral part of payments, which are remitted to the shipping lines.
In view of the above discussion, they find that the Service Tax is not leviable on ocean freight. It is appropriate that the adjudicating authority should examine all the issues in the light of the above decisions and appellants would be directed to produce documents for proper verification.
Accordingly, they set aside the impugned order and the matter is remanded back to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh after considering the submissions of the appellant in accordance with law. The appeal is allowed by way of remand.
 
Decision:The gist of the case is that the assessee was providing mainly distribution of logistics support service to exporters/importers located in India. Assessee has charged Ocean freight in his invoices which was exempted from levy of service tax. Department has issued show cause notice on the ground that the It is a composite service and the pre-dominating factor is logistics support service, which is covered under Business Support Service. Hence as assessee is not eligible for exemption related to ocean freight.
The Tribunal has set aside the order of original authority and remanded the matter to original authority to examine issues in light of documents

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com