Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   RTI applicant in Madhya Pradesh asked to pay GST for information *   India’s GST collection drops to Rs93,960cr in August *   Karnataka Taxmen arrest two Bengaluru businessmen in GST related fraud *  Govt may soon impose IGST on ex-factory sales; decision in September. *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold *  Kerala Floods: Relief Goods Exempted From Customs Duty, IGST *  No GST On Petrol, Diesel In Near Future As Centre, States Not In Favour. *  Kerala plans to raise Rs 7.5 bn through hiked liquor duty & 10% cess on GST. *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST. *  Firms can't be selective in passing on rate cut benefits under GST regime *  Technical glitches continue to haunt the Goods and Services Tax Network *  GST Annual Return: Everything you need to know about the format, eligibility & rules around GSTR 9  *  Post GST, J&K’s own tax collection drops by Rs 1,300 crore since July 2017 *  GST Council may replace 12% and 18% slabs with 14-15% one: Sushil Modi *  Domino’s lands in trouble for not passing on GST cuts *   Higher oil prices, GST may boost states revenue by Rs 37,400 crore in FY19  *   These taxpayers no more at mercy of GST intermediaries *  Budget 2018: No fiscal derailment, but a lot rides on GST; expect caution from RBI *  GST: E-way bill implementation deferred due to glitches *  Homebuyers must avoid traps on the name of NO GST Impact *   Govt will formulate a comprehensive gold policy to develop gold as an asset class *   Government to evolve to asign a unique id to every individual enterprise. *   1.48 lakh crore for rail budget. *   7148 Crore to be sanctioned to textile sector. *   3700 corore for SME industry *  16000 crore for free electricity connection *   Government ignored warnings over GST rollout: sources *  GSTR 3B questionaire introduced- To be filled before filing return *  Advisory mail  to all the taxpayers received from GSTN *   Advisory group on GST submits report, suggests changes
Subject News *  Consumer durables firms, GST body continue to spar over profiteering *   225 million e-way bills generated across India since GST rollout *   September last month to fix GST filing errors *   Due date of TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 is extended *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-3B only for newly migrated taxpayers *   Extension of Due date for GSTR-1 *   Taxpayer with turnover over Rs 2 cr need GST audit certificate, will be arduous job for auditors *   Whether the appellants are eligible for refund of the duty claimed to have been paid in excess on the basis of DMT of the goods? Whether the said claim of refund is sustainable without challenging the assessment of the shipping bills. (Source:PJ/CASE LAW/2018-2019/3479) *   GST Flash Updates on various circulars and notifications dated 04/09/2018 *   GST Update on Circular No. 61/2018-GST dated 04.09.2018 *   GST Update on disharmony in CGST and SGST *    Update on restriction of refund of IGST paid on exports under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules *   1,800 businesses migrate to GST regime *   ‘Missing’ service tax credit in GST update worries companies  *   Government notifies new annual return form for GST *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff. *  : Whether processing of secondary raw materials(steel scrap of different and variable composition) into blended steel scrap is liable for payment of central excise duty under the provision of the central excise Act,1944?Can  such “blended metal scrap” can be classified under tariff item 72044900 of the central excise tariff Act, 1985? *  Whether the transportation of goods by means of hired vehicles such that no consignment note is issued, would fall under the category of Goods Transport Agency Service? *  Whether the applicant is eligible to avail the benefit of exemption from payment of SAD provided under Notification No. 21/2012-Cus. *  Whether the polyester sewing thread manufactured by the appellant is excisable or not. *  INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIAMOND GRADING & RESEARCH INDIA P. LTD. *  Whether grading and inscription of diamonds by the appellant (IIDGR India Private Limited) would amount to manufacture under Central Excise legislation. *  What is the classification when frozen meat is sold in packaged form and rate of tax to be applicable? *  Is the unutilized cenvat credit available before surrender of registration transferable to the new unit? *  Whether Kindle device is covered under Tariff Item 8543 70 99 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or not? *  GST Council considering Kerala government's proposal of 'calamity tax' *  Orissa HC directs authorities not to take action against importers on GST *  Whether the assessee on filing of second appeal before Tribunal is required to make an additional pre-deposit of 10% of the duty and penalty in dispute? *  Whether Automatic Taps, Urinals and WC Flushing Systems would be classified under heading 9032 or Heading 8481 of Central Excise tariff? *  Niti Aayog Suggests Slashing Import Duty, GST On Gold  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-17/3443

Whether transportation charges collected be admissible as deduction in form of freight charges?
Case:- COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., NAGPUR-II Versus SOLAR EXPLOSIVES LTD.
Citation:- 2017 (345) E.L.T. 136 (Tri. - Mumbai)
Issue:-Whether transportation charges collected be admissible as deduction in form of freight charges?
Brief facts:-The issue involved in this case was regarding the demand of differential duty from the respondent on the amount of freight charged by them for transportation of explosives to various coal fields. The contention of Revenue was that the duty liability arises on transportation charges so collected by the respondent for outward journey and return journey. Thus, the deduction on account of transportation charges collected by the respondent was not admissible to them as the freight charges. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand raised with interest and also imposed penalty. On an appeal, the first appellate authority by impugned order had set aside the order-in-original and allowed the appeal filed by the respondent.
Appellant’s contention:- Learned DR assailed the order and submitted that the duty liability arose on the transportation of the explosives from the factory premises to the coal fields and it had been collected by issuing commercial invoices. He relied upon the Board’s Circular No. 643/34/2002-CX., dated 1-7-2002 wherein Board had clarified that outward and inward journey was liable to be taxed. It was his submission that the respondent had supplied the explosives to the coal fields based upon the contract which was entered into after tendering for the supply of explosives. As per the terms of the contract, the explosives were to be supplied at the coal field as required hence the cost of transportation charged separately by the respondent was liable to be included in the value of the goods for discharge of Central Excise duty.
Respondent’s contention:-Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise v. Ispat Industries Ltd. - 2015 (324) E.L.T. 670 (S.C.) had held that the freight charges could not be included in the assessable value on the ground that the sale took place at the buyer’s place. He also submitted that on factual matrix the invoices raised clearly indicate that the freight charges for which the deduction was allowed as per Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000.
Reasoning of judgment:-The Tribunal found that Revenue’s case had no merits inasmuch as the period involved in the case in hand was from July, 2000 to June, 2004. During the period, duty liability had to be discharged on the basis of transaction value and the transaction between the respondent and coal field for supply of explosives was as per the value contracted by both the parties. The contract also emphasised the transportation of explosives to the coal field which was done so by the respondent using their own specialized vehicle. They had seen the specimen invoice copy produced by the learned Counsel and noted that duty paying documents were indicating separately the value for the transportation. The first appellate authority in the impugned order in unnumbered paragraph, in internal Page No. 9 of the order specifically recorded that the adjudicating authority had verified the invoices and collected the freight charges indicating on the invoices itself. If that be so, they found that the provisions of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, were directly applicable in the case in hand, wherein it was provided that the transport cost need not be included in the assessable value if it was billed on the invoice and collected. It was not the case of the Revenue that the respondent had billed for more transportation charges than actually paid by them. In the absence of contrary evidence indicating that the respondent collected excess freight, they held that the provisions of Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules had been complied with and the excess of transportation charges need not to be included in the assessable value for discharge of additional excess duty.
Decision:-Appeal rejected.
Comment:-The analogy drawn from the case is that Rule 5 of Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, will directly be applicable and transport cost need not be included in the assessable valuein the cases where:
·         Transportation charges are separately shown in the invoice and collected.
·         The person has not billed for more transportation charges than actually paid by them.
·         No extra transportation charges is collected than actually incurred.
Prepared by:-Praniti Lalwani
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com