Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2820

Whether TR-6 challan is prescribed document for availment of credit prior to 16.06.2005?

Case:-COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, GOA VERSUSESSEL PROPACK LTD.
 
Citation:-2015 (39) S.T.R. 363 (Bom.)
 
Brief facts:-All the above appeals were ordered to be taken up together as the Counsel appearing for the parties had contended that common substantial questions of law arise in all the above appeals.
The above appeals came to be admitted by this Court by an order dated 21st July, 2008. Thereafter, at the request of and by consent of the learned Counsel, the substantial questions of law came to be modified by an order dated 29th January, 2015. The modified substantial question of law by consent, reads thus :
“Whether the respondent is entitled to claim Cenvat credit prior to 16-6-2005 on the basis of TR-6 Challan, in terms of Rule 9 which was introduced on 16-6-2005?”
 
Appellant’s contention:-Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants have pointed out that Rule 9 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 clearly provides the requisite documents to be produced in order to avail of the Cenvat credit. The learned Counsel further point out that the respondents have not produced any of such documents and, as such, the question of availing of any credit, on such basis, would not arise at all. The learned Counsel further points out that the respondents have a TR-6 Challan to substantiate their claim for refund of Service Tax though such document was introduced by the amendment to the Rule in 2005 to avail of Cenvat credit. The learned Counsel further points out that the subject period, in the present proceedings, is from 1-5-2005 to 15-6-2005 when the said amendment was not in force, and as such, the question of relying upon such TR-6 Challan does not arise at all. The learned Counsel further point out that the Authorities below have misconstrued the relevant provisions of the Rules to come to the conclusion that the respondents were eligible for such credit. The learned Counsel, as such, submits that the substantial question of law be answered in favour of the appellants.
 
Respondent’s contention:- On the other hand, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents have supported the orders passed by the Authorities below. The learned Counsel points out that the fact that the respondents are eligible for such credit, has not been disputed by the Authorities. The learned Counsel further submits that the right to avail such credit flows from Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and not under Rule 9 which is only procedural. The learned Counsel further submits that even in the year 2004-05 TR-6 Challans were issued when certain tax was paid and such documentary evidence which comes from the Department itself can be accepted to substantiate their claim for Cenvat credit. The learned Counsel, as such, submits that the substantial question of law be answered in favour of the respondent.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- They have duly considered the submissions of learned Counsel and they have also gone through the records.
In the present case, the respondents are availing facilities of Cenvat credit for duty paid on inputs, capital goods and input services in terms of Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It was the contention of the appellant that the respondents have to reverse the Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on goods transport agencies between the period of March, 2005 to 15-6-2005 which they did not accept. It is further the contention of the appellant that Rule 9 specified the documents on which Cenvat credit can be availed of by a manufacturer prior to 16-6-2005. In terms of clause (e) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 9, of the Rules of 2004, a challan evidencing payment of Service Tax was a specified document for the purpose of availing Service Tax credit and the entities listed in clauses (i), (ii), and (iv) of Rule 2 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 can take the Service Tax credit on the strength of such challan. But, however, in the case of goods transport agency, although the recipient of the services has been made liable to pay Service Tax with effect from 1st January, 2005 vide Notification dated 3-12-2004, but the agency has been made eligible to take credit thereof only from 16th June, 2005, vide Notification dated 7th June, 2005, by virtue of which clause (v) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 2 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 was inserted making the recipients of goods transport agency service eligible to take credit of the Service Tax paid on such goods transport agency services. As such, it is the contention of the appellant that the respondents who have paid Service Tax for goods transport agency services could not have taken the credit on the basis of the TR-6 Challans prior to 16th June, 2005. As, admittedly, the respondents have availed of such credit during the said period, it was the contention of the appellants that the respondents were not entitled to such credit. The fact that the respondents have paid Service Tax and, as such, are entitled to credit during the said period has not been disputed by the appellant. As per Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, Cenvat credit of, inter alia, Service Tax leviable and paid on any input services can be availed of.
On going through the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, they find that they do not prescribe any documents for availing of Service Tax credit during the disputed period in respect of the Service Tax paid on goods transport agency services. The appellant, in the present case, has nowhere contended which were the specified document for availing of such credit during the relevant time. If no documents have been mentioned, TR-6 Challan has to be considered as a proper document, reflecting payment of such tax. Further, it is also not the case of the appellant that Service Tax was not paid by the respondents or that they were otherwise not entitled to such credit.
The Punjab & Haryana High Court, in the case of CCEv. Ralson India Ltd. -(2007) 6 STT 134 = 2008 (10)S.T.R.505 (P & H) held that if the duty paid has the character of inputs and their receipt in manufacturer’s factory and utilization in manufacture of final product is not disputed, then the credit cannot be denied to such person. It is also to be noted that the Department’s Circular dated 19th November, 2001 observes that once the duty payment is not disputed and it is found that the documents are genuine and not fraudulent, then the manufacturer would be entitled to Cenvat credit on duty paid inputs.
In the present case, the authorities below have accepted that the respondents are entitled to such Cenvat credit. The only point for consideration, in such circumstances is the type of document required to be produced to avail of such credit. The respondents have produced the TR-6 Challan which is emanated from the office of the appellants themselves to support their claim for such Cenvat credit, which material was accepted by the authorities below whilst passing the impugned order.
For the aforesaid reasons, the question of discarding the said Challan to avail of such Cenvat credit, as contended by the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant, cannot be accepted. The Authorities below, as such, have rightly accepted the said Challan as proof of payment of Service Tax and, as such, no infirmity can be found in the orders passed by the Authorities below. In any event, the appellants are not entitled to rely upon Rule 9 to refuse the credit to the respondents, as Rule 9 is a procedural aspect which cannot deny the claim of the respondents to avail of such Cenvat credit which they are, otherwise, admittedly, entitled to. The substantial question of law is answered accordingly.
In view of the above, they find no merit in the above appeals which stand, accordingly, dismissed.
 
Decision:-Appeals dismissed
 
Comment:-The crux of the case is that even if there was no document prescribed in rules for availment of credit of service tax paid by service recipient under reverse charge mechanism, TR-6 Challan reflecting payment of Service Tax should be considered as proper document for availing credit. This is for the reason that the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in the case of CCEv. Ralson India Ltd. -(2007) 6 STT 134 = 2008 (10)S.T.R.505 (P & H) held that if the duty paid has the character of inputs and their receipt in manufacturer’s factory and utilization in manufacture of final product is not disputed, then the credit cannot be denied to such person.

Prepared by:- Monika Tak
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com