Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2597

Whether the sale of study material used by coaching classes is eligible for exemption under Notification no.12/2003?

Case:-CADD CENTRE TRAINING SERVICES (P) LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHENNAI-IV

Citation:- 2014(35) S.T.R. 842 (Tri-Chennai)


Brief facts:-
The applicant provides the services of commercial coaching and training in the fields of design, multimedia, architectural, engineering, mechanical design analysis, construction & management etc. They provide such training through their own centres and through their franchisees. In respect of franchise charges, they have been paying service tax under the franchise service. While providing commercial coaching and training, they were selling certain text books to the trainees. Further, it was one of conditions of franchise agreement that the franchisee shall conduct training using training materials supplied by the applicant and the applicant was selling such material to the franchisees. The applicant had not paid service tax on the materials sold directly to trainees in their own centres or to the franchisees.
Appellants contention:- The counsel for the applicant submits that exemption under Notification 12/2003-S.T. is applicable in respect of any materials sold and such exemption notification issued by government cannot be restricted through instructions issued by C.B.E. & C. to sale of standard text books. He further submits that they have been in fact selling their text books to any person who was interested in buying such text books and there were genuine sales to persons other than those to whom they were providing services. He relies on the order of Cerebral Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Indore - 2013-TIOL-34-CESTAT-DEL = 2013 (32)S.T.R.379 (Tribunal)wherein waiver of pre-deposit of dues was granted in similar context.
 
Respondents contention:-Opposing the prayer, ld. AR for Revenue submits that these books were of a type that could be used only in training classes to be provided by the applicant and their franchisees. He drew the attention of the Bench to the clause in the franchise agreement to the condition that franchisee should conduct training classes only using material sold by the applicant. According to him, this is a case of diversion of value of services to value of text books because the VAT rate on text books is very negligible as compared to rate of service tax. He relies on the following decisions in support of his argument:
 
(1)      Soni Classes v. CCE Jaipur - 2013 (30)S.T.R.92 (Tri.-Del.)
(2)      Fiitjee Ltd. v. CST Delhi - 2012 (25)S.T.R.24 (Tri.-Del.)
 
Revenue was of the view that the consideration received for sale of training material would form part of the value of the services rendered by the applicant. Revenue was of the view that exemption under Notification 12/2003-S.T., in relation to goods sold in the course of providing services will be applicable only for standard text books sold and the text books in question were prepared by the applicant and tailor-made for the training classes to be imparted either by them or by their franchisees and therefore the said exemption could not be claimed. Based on such reasoning, a show cause notice was issued for recovery of service tax not paid for the period 2005-06 to Sept., 2009 and after adjudication, an amount of Rs. 2,33,49,899/- is confirmed against the applicant along with interest and penalty.

Reasoning of judgment:-Considered arguments on both sides. In the case of Soni Classes (supra), the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the sale of books was not bonafide transaction based on various evidences which were available in that case. The case of Fiitjee Ltd. (supra) is a stay order. There are few other decisions to the effect that sale of study materials used by coaching classes is eligible for exemption under Notification 12/2003-S.T. as in the case of M/s. Cerebral Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (supra). Prima facie, we adopt the reasoning given in the case of Cerebral Learning Solutions (supra) and grant waiver of pre-deposit of dues arising from the impugned order for admission of appeal. There shall be stay on collection of such dues during pendency of appeal.
 
Decision:- Stay application allowed.
 
Comment:- The crux of the case is that exemption under Notification No.12/2003 is in relation to the goods sold in providing the services and is also available to commercial training and institutes in respect of study material supplied by them. The exemption under notification no. 12/2003 cannot be restricted to standard books and rather it is also available for customized books. The ratio of the decision given in case of M/s. Cerebral Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. was followed.

Prepared by:-Neelam Jain

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com