Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2597

Whether the sale of study material used by coaching classes is eligible for exemption under Notification no.12/2003?

Case:-CADD CENTRE TRAINING SERVICES (P) LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., CHENNAI-IV

Citation:- 2014(35) S.T.R. 842 (Tri-Chennai)


Brief facts:-
The applicant provides the services of commercial coaching and training in the fields of design, multimedia, architectural, engineering, mechanical design analysis, construction & management etc. They provide such training through their own centres and through their franchisees. In respect of franchise charges, they have been paying service tax under the franchise service. While providing commercial coaching and training, they were selling certain text books to the trainees. Further, it was one of conditions of franchise agreement that the franchisee shall conduct training using training materials supplied by the applicant and the applicant was selling such material to the franchisees. The applicant had not paid service tax on the materials sold directly to trainees in their own centres or to the franchisees.
Appellants contention:- The counsel for the applicant submits that exemption under Notification 12/2003-S.T. is applicable in respect of any materials sold and such exemption notification issued by government cannot be restricted through instructions issued by C.B.E. & C. to sale of standard text books. He further submits that they have been in fact selling their text books to any person who was interested in buying such text books and there were genuine sales to persons other than those to whom they were providing services. He relies on the order of Cerebral Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE Indore - 2013-TIOL-34-CESTAT-DEL = 2013 (32)S.T.R.379 (Tribunal)wherein waiver of pre-deposit of dues was granted in similar context.
 
Respondents contention:-Opposing the prayer, ld. AR for Revenue submits that these books were of a type that could be used only in training classes to be provided by the applicant and their franchisees. He drew the attention of the Bench to the clause in the franchise agreement to the condition that franchisee should conduct training classes only using material sold by the applicant. According to him, this is a case of diversion of value of services to value of text books because the VAT rate on text books is very negligible as compared to rate of service tax. He relies on the following decisions in support of his argument:
 
(1)      Soni Classes v. CCE Jaipur - 2013 (30)S.T.R.92 (Tri.-Del.)
(2)      Fiitjee Ltd. v. CST Delhi - 2012 (25)S.T.R.24 (Tri.-Del.)
 
Revenue was of the view that the consideration received for sale of training material would form part of the value of the services rendered by the applicant. Revenue was of the view that exemption under Notification 12/2003-S.T., in relation to goods sold in the course of providing services will be applicable only for standard text books sold and the text books in question were prepared by the applicant and tailor-made for the training classes to be imparted either by them or by their franchisees and therefore the said exemption could not be claimed. Based on such reasoning, a show cause notice was issued for recovery of service tax not paid for the period 2005-06 to Sept., 2009 and after adjudication, an amount of Rs. 2,33,49,899/- is confirmed against the applicant along with interest and penalty.

Reasoning of judgment:-Considered arguments on both sides. In the case of Soni Classes (supra), the Tribunal came to the conclusion that the sale of books was not bonafide transaction based on various evidences which were available in that case. The case of Fiitjee Ltd. (supra) is a stay order. There are few other decisions to the effect that sale of study materials used by coaching classes is eligible for exemption under Notification 12/2003-S.T. as in the case of M/s. Cerebral Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (supra). Prima facie, we adopt the reasoning given in the case of Cerebral Learning Solutions (supra) and grant waiver of pre-deposit of dues arising from the impugned order for admission of appeal. There shall be stay on collection of such dues during pendency of appeal.
 
Decision:- Stay application allowed.
 
Comment:- The crux of the case is that exemption under Notification No.12/2003 is in relation to the goods sold in providing the services and is also available to commercial training and institutes in respect of study material supplied by them. The exemption under notification no. 12/2003 cannot be restricted to standard books and rather it is also available for customized books. The ratio of the decision given in case of M/s. Cerebral Learning Solutions Pvt. Ltd. was followed.

Prepared by:-Neelam Jain

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com