Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1134

Whether the Outbound services as, booking of air tickets, arrangements of food, local travel, hotel stay at places outside India are covered under the category of ‘Tour operator Services’?
Case: TRAVEL CORPORATION INDIA LTD. V/S COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., COCHIN
 
Citation: 2012 (26) S.T.R. 8 (Tri.-Bang.)
 
Issue:-  Whether the Outbound services as, booking of air tickets, arrangements of food, local travel, hotel stay at places outside India are covered under the category of ‘Tour operator Services’? 
 
Brief Facts: - Applicant is engaged in arranging tours/tour packages within India and out of India. The present dispute relates to 'Out Bound Tours'. The applicant undertakes activities like booking of air tickets, arrangements for hotel stay at places outside India, food, local travel at places outside India, etc. They also undertake work relating to Visa formalities. Information found scattered in the show-cause notice, some paragraphs of Order-in-Original and letter given by the applicant to the Range Superintendent, prima facie indicates that the applicant is paying Service Tax under the category 'Air Travel Services" in respect of tickets booked from place in India to the first place outside India and air travel from last destination in foreign country to first destination in India. It appears from the order, the department has held that the entire amount collected from the tourists including airfare to-and-fro and towards expenses incurred in connection with arrangements like hotel stay and sight-seeing was to be included under the category of "Tour Operator Services". Accordingly, the Commissioner has confirmed the demand of Service tax of Rs. 62,59,120/- relating to the period 1-4-2004 to 31-3-2008 along with interest and imposed penalties under different Sections.
 
 
 
Appellant’s Contention: - The appellant contended that though some activities are undertaken in India relating to planning of tour package, the entire activities of travel, stay, sightseeing etc. take place in a foreign country and planning also involve coordinating with counter-parts in foreign countries. Appeallant relies on paragraph 2.6 of Board's Circular F. No. B. 43/10/97-TRU, dated 22-8-1997 and submits that the said Circular issued by TRU at the time of introduction of services clearly stipulates that the out-bound tours are not subjected to service tax under the category "Tour Operator Services" and also submits that the said Circular has not been withdrawn while issuing the Master Circular No. 96/7/2007-Service Tax, dated 23-8-2007. As per paragraph 7 of the said Master Circular, letters issued by TRU at the time of introduction of services have to be read in the light of the definition of the services. He also relies on the Stay Order No. 548/2011, dated 28-6-2011 in an identical case of M/s. Cox & Kings (India) Ltd. [2011 (24) S.T.R. 631 (Tri.)].
                                                                   
 
Respondent’s Contention: - The respondents on the other hand reiterating the findings and reasoning of the Commissioner in his order, submits that primarily, planning relating to the tour is done in India and therefore, pre-deposit of the dues as per the impugned order should be ordered.
 
Reasoning of Judgment: - The Hon’ble Tribunal held that planning and arrangements undertaken are primarily relating to out-bound tours and the same involve coordination with agencies outside India. He also held that the Board's Circular F. No. B.43/10/97-TRU, dated 22-8-1997 has treated the activities of out-bound tours as outside the purview of service tax. Further he find that the service tax undisputedly stands paid on airfares from India to the first destination in foreign country and for airfares from last destination abroad to first destination in India, as air travel services. In view of the above, and in view of the stay order already granted in similar case, he waived pre-deposit of the dues as per the impugned order and stay recovery thereof till the disposal of the appeal.
 
 
Decision: - The stay was granted.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com