Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1134

Whether the Outbound services as, booking of air tickets, arrangements of food, local travel, hotel stay at places outside India are covered under the category of ‘Tour operator Services’?
Case: TRAVEL CORPORATION INDIA LTD. V/S COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., COCHIN
 
Citation: 2012 (26) S.T.R. 8 (Tri.-Bang.)
 
Issue:-  Whether the Outbound services as, booking of air tickets, arrangements of food, local travel, hotel stay at places outside India are covered under the category of ‘Tour operator Services’? 
 
Brief Facts: - Applicant is engaged in arranging tours/tour packages within India and out of India. The present dispute relates to 'Out Bound Tours'. The applicant undertakes activities like booking of air tickets, arrangements for hotel stay at places outside India, food, local travel at places outside India, etc. They also undertake work relating to Visa formalities. Information found scattered in the show-cause notice, some paragraphs of Order-in-Original and letter given by the applicant to the Range Superintendent, prima facie indicates that the applicant is paying Service Tax under the category 'Air Travel Services" in respect of tickets booked from place in India to the first place outside India and air travel from last destination in foreign country to first destination in India. It appears from the order, the department has held that the entire amount collected from the tourists including airfare to-and-fro and towards expenses incurred in connection with arrangements like hotel stay and sight-seeing was to be included under the category of "Tour Operator Services". Accordingly, the Commissioner has confirmed the demand of Service tax of Rs. 62,59,120/- relating to the period 1-4-2004 to 31-3-2008 along with interest and imposed penalties under different Sections.
 
 
 
Appellant’s Contention: - The appellant contended that though some activities are undertaken in India relating to planning of tour package, the entire activities of travel, stay, sightseeing etc. take place in a foreign country and planning also involve coordinating with counter-parts in foreign countries. Appeallant relies on paragraph 2.6 of Board's Circular F. No. B. 43/10/97-TRU, dated 22-8-1997 and submits that the said Circular issued by TRU at the time of introduction of services clearly stipulates that the out-bound tours are not subjected to service tax under the category "Tour Operator Services" and also submits that the said Circular has not been withdrawn while issuing the Master Circular No. 96/7/2007-Service Tax, dated 23-8-2007. As per paragraph 7 of the said Master Circular, letters issued by TRU at the time of introduction of services have to be read in the light of the definition of the services. He also relies on the Stay Order No. 548/2011, dated 28-6-2011 in an identical case of M/s. Cox & Kings (India) Ltd. [2011 (24) S.T.R. 631 (Tri.)].
                                                                   
 
Respondent’s Contention: - The respondents on the other hand reiterating the findings and reasoning of the Commissioner in his order, submits that primarily, planning relating to the tour is done in India and therefore, pre-deposit of the dues as per the impugned order should be ordered.
 
Reasoning of Judgment: - The Hon’ble Tribunal held that planning and arrangements undertaken are primarily relating to out-bound tours and the same involve coordination with agencies outside India. He also held that the Board's Circular F. No. B.43/10/97-TRU, dated 22-8-1997 has treated the activities of out-bound tours as outside the purview of service tax. Further he find that the service tax undisputedly stands paid on airfares from India to the first destination in foreign country and for airfares from last destination abroad to first destination in India, as air travel services. In view of the above, and in view of the stay order already granted in similar case, he waived pre-deposit of the dues as per the impugned order and stay recovery thereof till the disposal of the appeal.
 
 
Decision: - The stay was granted.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com