Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2617

Whether the excess amount of freight recovered from the customer is to be included in the assessable value of goods?

Case-BATHINDA INDUSTRIAL GASES Versus COMMR. OF C. EX. & S.T., CHANDIGARH-II

 

Citation-2014 (308) E.L.T. 111 (Tri. - Del.)

 

Brief Facts-The facts leading to filing of this appeal and stay application are in brief as under :-

The appellant are a manufacturer of Carbon dioxide and other gases chargeable to Central Excise duty under Chapter 28 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They deliver the gases to their customers in their own specially designed tankers for which they charged their customers and as such freight charges are separately mentioned in the sale invoices issued by them to their customers. In course of audit of their records, it was found that during the year 2005-2006 to 2009-2010, the total amount recovered by the appellant from their customers towards freight was more than the expenses incurred by them on transportation and as such excess amount recovered from the customers towards freight was Rs. 92,26,000/-. The Department was of the view that this amount should form part of the assessable value of the gases sold. Accordingly, after issue of Show Cause Notice, the Jurisdictional Additional Commissioner vide order-in-original dated 24-4-2012 confirmed the Central Excise duty demand of Rs. 12,54,681/- along with interest thereon under Section 11AB in respect of clearances of gases during period from 2005-2006 to 2009-2010 and besides this imposed penalty of equal amount on the appellant under Section 11AC. This demand was confirmed by invoking extended limitation period under proviso to Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act. On appeal being filed to Commissioner (Appeals), this order of the Additional Commissioner was upheld vide order-in-appeal dated 1-7-2013. In course of proceedings before the Additional Commissioner as well as before Commissioner (Appeals), the appellant pleaded that their sales are at the factory gate and, hence, neither the freight charges nor the differential freight was includible in the assessable value of the goods, but this plea was not accepted and the Lower Authorities held that the sales of the appellant were on FOR basis. Against this order of the Commissioner (Appeals), this appeal had been filed along with stay application. Though this matter was listed for hearing of the stay application only, after hearing the same for some time, the Bench was of the view that since only a short issue is involved, the matter can be heard for final disposal. Accordingly with the consent of both the sides, the appeal was heard for final disposal.

Appellants Contention-Ms. Surbhi Sinha, Advocate, the learned counsel for the appellant, pleaded that the appellant’s sales were at the factory gate, that the amount of freight was being shown separately in the invoices, that just because the gases had to be transported in the specially designed tankers and the appellant own a fleet of such tankers, the appellant arranged transportation for the gases to their customers’ premises, that there was nothing in the invoices or any other documents which showed that the sale were on FOR destination basis, that when the sales were at the factory gate, there was no question of including freight charges in the assessable value of the goods sold, even if the freight amount charged by appellant from their customers was more than the actual expenses incurred in running of trucks, that in any case, the differential freight would not be includible in assessable value, that in this regard she relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Baroda Electric Meters Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, reported in 1997 (94)E.L.T.13 (S.C.) and that in view of the above submissions, the impugned order was not correct.

 

Respondents Contention-Sh. Jayant Sahay, the learned D.R., defended the impugned order by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) and emphasized that the sales of the gases were on FOR basis and hence the actual freight amount recovered by the appellant from their customers would be includible in the assessable value. He, accordingly, pleaded that there was no infirmity in the impugned order.

 

Reasoning of Judgment-The tribunal considered the submissions from both the sides and perused the records. The undisputed fact was that the appellant were mentioning the freight amount separately in the invoices issued by them to their customers. From the facts narrated in the show cause notice and in the Order-in-Original as well as in Order-in-Appeal, it was seen that what the Department sought to include in the assessable value of the gases sold by them, is the differential freight i.e. difference between the amount charged by the appellant from their customers during 2005-2006 to 2009-2010 period as freight and the actual expense incurred on running of the tankers for delivery of gases to the customers. However, the differential freight would be includible only if the freight from the factory gate to the customer’s premise is includible in the assessable value and this can be done only if sales are on FOR destination basis in the sense that during transit, the risk of the loss of goods or damage to the goods is of the seller-manufacturer and the ownership of the goods during transit is of the manufacturer and freight is integral part of the value of the goods. In this case, though both the Lower Authorities have given finding that sales were on FOR destination basis, no evidence in this regard had been disclosed. It was not the case of Department that the invoices themselves mentioned the sales as FOR sales or that the supply orders placed by the customers mention the supply of gases on FOR basis. In fact, the invoices show the freight charges separately. In view of these circumstances, just because the customer wanted the appellant to supply the gases at their premises, it would not be correct to presume that sales were on FOR basis. There was also no allegation that the part of value of the goods was being recovered as freight charges by under-declaring the value of the goods and inflating the freight charges. In the circumstance of the case running of the tankers for supply of gases had to be treated as an independent activity and therefore the differential freight would not be includible in the assessable value. This was what the Apex Court had held in the case of Baroda Electric Meters Ltd. (supra).The tribunal, therefore, hold that the differential freight was not includible on the assessable value of the goods and the impugned order was sustainable. The same was set aside. The appeal as well as stay application were allowed.

Decision-Appeal allowed

Comment-The crux of the case is that if the sales are on FOR destination basis then the  freight is to be included in the assessable value. Therefore it is clear that when the sales were at the factory gate, there was no question of including freight charges in the assessable value of the goods sold, even if the freight amount charged by appellant from their customers was more than the actual expenses incurred, the differential freight would not be includible in assessable value. The profit earned on account of freight will not form part of transaction value.

Prepared By-Neelam Jain

Checked by: Prayushi Jain

 
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com