Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2016-17/3069

Whether the cenvat credit can be availed on the basis of invoices containing addresses of unregistered unit?

Case-TOLL (I) LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-I

Citation-2016 (41) S.T.R. 80 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief Facts-The present appeal is against Order-in-Appeal No. P-I/RKS/106/2011, dated 21-7-2011 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune-I. The brief facts of case are that the appellant, “M/s. Toll (I) Logistics Pvt. Ltd.”, Pune are holders of Service Tax Registration and are engaged in providing “Clearing and Forwarding” Services. During the course of audit of the records for 2006-07 to 2008-09, it was seen that the appellants had availed Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on input services, on the basis of bills, wherein, the address mentioned on the Bill was not of their unit at Chakan, but was of “Lonikand and/or Bhiwandi units” which was not the registered premises of appellant. The issue arising in this case is that whether appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit of Service Tax on bills where the address mentioned is not of registered premises, but other premises/units.
Show cause notice dated 6-8-2010 (invoking extended period) was issued to the appellant demanding an amount of Rs. 3,04,203/-, for disallowing credit which is wrongly availed by appellant on basis of invalid documents along with interest under Section 75 and penalty under Section 78 read with Rule 15(3) of the Finance Act, 1994. The proposed demand was upheld by the adjudicating authority stating that appellant had contravened the provisions of Rule 9(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, read with Rule 4A(1)(ii) of Service Tax Rules.
Appellant had accepted the fact that it was a procedural lapse, as they had not availed facility of Centralized Registration. Being aggrieved by impugned Order-in-Original appellant preferred appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) who also agreed with order passed by the adjudicating authority, denying Cenvat credit on such invoices and upheld the Order-in-Original.
Aggrieved by the Order-in-Appeal, appellant is before this Tribunal.
 
Appelants Contention-The learned Counsel of appellant during arguments have contended that the demand raised by the department is barred by limitation of time, as there was no fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression from the appellant side to evade tax payment. This is proved by fact; that appellant had regularly filed the ST-3 returns further, as there is no such requirement to enclose the invoices along with the Service Tax Return, as per Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the extended period of limitation is not attracted. It cannot be alleged that appellant had suppressed the fact for evasion of tax payment. Further to this, the fact of availment of Cenvat credit, on basis of invoices containing address of other units, was known to the department in May, 2009 during the course of Audit, event then too, the show cause notice was issued in August, 2010 i.e. beyond one year.
Further, learned Counsel states that Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 lays more thrust on substantive provision and less on the procedural provisions. Once the substantive provisions are complied with for a mere technical lapse the right to Cenvat credit cannot be denied to the appellant. As appellant had satisfied all requirements except relating to address on invoice, which being a mere technical lapse should be considered as per Circular No. 441/7/99-CX, dated 23-12-1999. The circular provides that the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over factory of manufacturer shall allow credit of duty on inputs/capital goods ignoring minor procedural lapses in filing the declaration or in the invoice/document based on which credit is taken, emphasis was placed on this circular in case of Commissioner of Customs, Meerut v. Triveny Engineering & Industries Ltd. - 2004 (177)E.L.T.211 (Tri.-Del.), wherein, it was held, credit is not deniable on ground of procedural defects.
Learned Counsel further states that levy of penalty requires the existence of “mens rea”, while in this case, there was no such intention to wrongly avail Cenvat credit. Hence penalty imposed on appellant, is fit to be set aside.
 
Respondents Contention-The learned AR appearing on behalf of the department reiterates the findings of the lower authorities.
Reasoning Of JudgementHaving considered the rival contentions, they find that as there was no lapse in payment of duty or tax and filing Service Tax return by the appellant the other premises/units also belong to the appellant from where the output services are rendered. The input services to which the invoices in dispute relate are utilized in rendering output taxable service. The appellant have made payment of input service along with the Service Tax charged by the service provider. The appellant have maintained proper records in normal course of business, and have disclosed the credit taken regularly in periodical returns. Thus they hold that the appellant is entitled to avail Cenvat credit, disputed by Revenue. And they further hold that show cause notice is time-barred, and extended period of limitation is not invocable. Hence, they allow the appeal and set aside the impugned order. The appellant will be entitled to the consequential relief, if any, as per law.
 
Decision-Appeal allowed
 
Comment-The essence of the case is that since there is no lapse in payment of duty and filing of service tax returns, other premises/units also belong to assessee from where output services rendered. Input services in respect of the invoices containing addresses of unregistered unit are utilized in rendering output taxable service and payment for input service utilized along with Service Tax charged by service provider, made by assessee and since the proper record maintained in normal course of business and credit taken disclosed regularly in periodical returns assessee is entitled to avail credit. Further, show cause notice is time-barred, and hence the extended period of limitation not invocable.
 
Prepared By-Neelam Jain
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com