Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2797

Whether the Cenvat credit be availed on the Service Tax paid for imported Reinsurance Services for the output services of insurance by the assessee?

Case:-COMMR. OF C. EX., BANGALORE VersusPNB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
 
Citation:-2015 (39) S.T.R. 561 (Kar.)

Brief facts:- The brief facts of the case are that the respondent - PNB Metlife India Insurance Company Ltd., (for short referred to as ‘Insurer’) is engaged in, and licensed to carry on Life Insurance business. In the process of its business, the Insurer issues Insurance Policies on which Service Tax is charged from its customers (Insured). Section 101A of the Insurance Act 1938, requires every insurer to have a certain percentage of the insurance coverage given by the Insurer to be re-insured by another company.
In the present case, the respondent - Insurer had procured re-insurance service from over-seas Insurance companies and had availed Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on such services received by it. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Adjudication), vide its order dated 2-12-2013, disallowed the Cenvat credit to the respondent - Insurer and held that Service Tax paid on re-insurance services received cannot be considered as Input Service since re-insurance takes place after the Insurance business is affected. Accordingly, for the period from April 2008 to March 2012 the Commissioner disallowed the availed Cenvat credit of Rs. 12,04,06,544/- on re-insurance services and confirmed the demand of such credit and ordered recovery of the same from the insurer. An equal amount of penalty was also imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 r/w Rule 15(4) of the Cenvat Rules, 1994. On such amount, interest was also levied and a further penalty of Rs. 200/- for every day of failure to pay service tax due was also imposed. Challenging the said order, the respondent - Company filed an appeal before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, which has been allowed by the Tribunal by order dated 7-5-2014 [2014 (36)S.T.R.891 (Tri.-Bang.)]. Aggrieved by the same this appeal has been filed by the revenue raising the following substantial, question of law :-
“Whether the Cenvat credit availed and utilized by the assessee on the Service Tax paid for imported “Reinsurance Services” is an “input service’ within the meaning of Rule 2(l)(i) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 for the output services, i.e., Service of insurance the assessee was providing?”
They have heard Sri C. Shashikantha, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri G. Shivadass, learned Counsel for the respondent - Company and they have perused the records.
 
Appellant’s contention:- Learned Counsel for the appellant has contended that by the definition of Input Service, the provider of taxable service should be providing an Output Service, whereas in the case of the respondent - Insurer the Input service alleged to be given is after the Insurance policy has been issued by the Insurer, and Service Tax has been collected. According to the appellant, it is only after the insurance policy is issued by the Insurer that the reinsurance is taken from another company, on which it pays Service Tax and as such it would not be entitled to Cenvat credit, as the same cannot be termed as ‘Input Service’ within the meaning of Rule 2(l)(i) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It is also contended that there is no justification for the essential or indispensable nature of input service (i.e., reinsurance service) for provision of output service (i.e., insurance service). According to the appellant the reinsurance service is in the nature of reducing the risk factor of the insurer, which provides insurance service to its clients, which is subsequent to the provision of the said service. It has also been submitted that the contractual obligations between the service provider and service recipient have no bearing on the nature of activities between the service provider and the re-insurer. It is thus contended that the respondent - Insurer would not be entitled to the benefit of Cenvat credit.
 
Respondent’s contention:-Sri G. Shivadass, learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the business of insurance continues till the validity of the insurance policy and the process of reinsurance is an integral part of issuance of the insurance policy by the Insurer, more so, when the statute requires a particular percentage of insurance business to be mandatorily re-insured by another company. He has thus submitted that the order passed by the Tribunal in holding that the respondent would be entitled to Cenvat credit, is perfectly justified in law.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and in the fact of this case, they are of the opinion that the order of the Tribunal does not require any interference. Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 provides that ‘Input Service’ means service used by a provider of taxable service for providing an ‘Output Service’. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellant that once the Insurance Policy is issued by the Insurer, the transaction comes to an end (and would not depend on the reinsurance policy) and as such the service provided would not come within the ambit of input service, is not worthy of acceptance. The process of issuance of an Insurance Policy by the Insurer and subsequent procurement of reinsurance policy from another company (which is a statutory requirement) is an integral part of the total process. The process of insurance does not come to an end merely on the issuance of the Insurance Policy by the Insurer. In fact, it continues till the existence of the term of the policy. The re-insurance is taken by the Insurer immediately after the insurance policy is issued, as is required under Section 101A of the Insurance Act, 1938. Since re-insurance is a statutory obligation, and the same is coterminus with the Insurance policy issued by the respondent, they are of the opinion that the stand taken by the Tribunal is correct that the transfer of a portion of the risk of the re-insurance has to be considered as having nexus with the output service, since the re-insurance is a statutory obligation and the same is coterminus with the Insurance Policy. They only reiterate that the issuance of insurance policy by insurer, and then taking of reinsurance by it, is a continuous process, and in the facts of the present case, it cannot be said that the same would not be an ‘input service’ eligible for Cenvat credit within the meaning of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
They may further add that the Service Tax is levied for certain service rendered and the provision of giving the Cenvat credit is so that there may not be double taxation. If a person has collected service tax, no doubt the same has to be deposited, but if in the process of the same transaction he has paid some service tax, which is necessary for its business, then he is entitled to the Cenvat credit to the extent of service tax which has been paid by it. In the present case, if the entire Service Tax which is collected by the Insurer, while selling its insurance policies, has to be deposited without being given the credit of the tax which is paid by it while procuring a policy of re-insurance as (mandatorily required in law), the same would be against the ethos of Cenvat credit policy, as the same would amount to double taxation, which is not permissible in law.
In such view of the matter, no interference is called for with the order of the Tribunal. They are also of the opinion, that no substantial question of law arises for determination by this Court. Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
 
Decision:-Appeal dismissed
 
Comment:-The analogy of the case is that  process of issuance of an insurance policy by insurer and subsequent procurement of reinsurance policy from another company is an integral part of total process. Process of insurance does not come to an end merely on issuance of insurance policy by insurer.  Reinsurance is a statutory obligation. Issuance of insurance policy by insurer and then taking of reinsurance by it, is a continuous process, hence, cannot be said that same is not an ‘input service’ eligible for Cenvat credit. If entire Service Tax collected by insurer, while selling its insurance policies, has to be deposited without being given credit of tax which is paid by it while procuring a policy of reinsurance, same would be against ethos of Cenvat credit policy as same would amount to double taxation. Hence Cenvat Credit is allowed.

Prepared by:- Monika Tak

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com