Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2018-2019/3514

Whether the books supplied by the Chhattisgarh text book corporation as per instruction of school education department would tantamount to supply of goods or supply of service ?

Case: Chhattisgarh text book corporation

Citation: STC/AAR/08/2018

Issue: Whether the books supplied by the Chhattisgarh  text book corporation as per instruction of school education department would tantamount to supply of goods or supply of service ?

BriefFacts: The issue involved in appeal are filed by M/s Chhattisgarh Text Book Corporation (CTBC), holding GSTIN 22AAAJC0421F1Z8. CTBC is a registered society under Chhattisgarh Society Registration Act,1973. It performs the works of publishing and distribution of books, consequent to getting it printed and distributes such books of different literature at economical prices or free of cost to all Govt, private, subsidized and non-subsidized schools. The applicant has filed an application for seeking advance ruling on supply of books as per instruction of school education department after printing will tantamount to supply of goods or supply of service and the applicant also wants clarification regarding tax rate liability on such supply as per GST Act.

Appellant Contention:- The appellant submitted that CTBC is registered society follows the byelaws of Governement society. The department of education gives instruction to applicant to publish and provide books to various Government schools. Its price is also decided by Board members. The SCERT, a wing of Government prescribes the syllabus and content of book. The Text Book corporation gets syllabus from him and pays the royalty for the same. The book contains publisher name as CGTB, content owner as SCERT and printer’s name. The CTBG purchase the paper and gives on job work basis to printers. CGTB circulates the book to different areas as per direction of Government. In case of excess book or wrong printing of books, the loss is bearable by CTBG.

 

Respondent’s Contention and Reasoning of Judgement:  CTBG performs following activities namely preparation of syllabus, printing of books, upkeep of books and distribution to schools and transportation of books.

The definition of “Composite Supply” given under Section 2(30) of CGST Act, 2017 clearly covers this activity of printing, packing and distribution of books by CTBC. The ownership of such books always remains with the applicant and never transferred to School Education Department. The work of publishing and distribution of books, consequent to getting it printed and supply of books, printed with logo, design, name, address or other contents supplied by the recipient of such printed goods, are composite supplies. It is to be noted that in case of composite supplies, taxability is determined by the principal supply. It clearly indicates it been the case where the printer of books engaged by Chhattisgarh text book corporation for getting the books printed where only the content is supplied by the publisher and supply of printing would definitely qualify being treated as the principle supply and such supplies would constitute supply of service, which is not the case here. In the instant case the applicant has submitted that it provides such paper to job workers for getting the content printed as provide by SCERT. Therefore in view of the evidences furnished before us and as discussed above, we are inclined to hold that in this case supply of goods is involved which means ‘supply of specified printed educational books’, which is principal supply and accordingly we come to the considered conclusion that the said supply merits being treated as printed books and attracts zero rate, under notification no. 2/2017-state tax (rate) no.F-10-43/2017CT/V/70, dated 28.06.2017, under HSN code 4901.

Decision: It is considered as supply of goods which attracts zero rate.

Comment:  The gist of this case is that supply of books by Chhattisgarh text book corporation to all the govt. private, subsidized and non-subsidized school as per direction of department of education is considered as supply of goods and attracts zero tax rate.

 

However, a circular number 11/11/2017 dated October 20, 2017 was issued by the CBIC wherein it was clarified that in printing of book where content belong to author then it is supply of service. However, in current decision, it is declared as supply of goods. Hence, again there is dispute between advance ruling and circular.

But a thin line can be drawn on the basis of facts of the case. The impugned CBIC circular is with respect of printer but here the Chhattisgarh Text Book Corporation is not printer but get it printed from someone else. However, the content belongs to other person in this case also.

Prepared by Kasif

 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com