Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  GST registration cancellation without reasons amounts to ‘Economic Death’ of business: Supreme Court. *  No GST refund if appeal before GSTAT is filed late: Gujarat High Court. *  Mere upload of GST notice on portal not valid service, appeal limitation won’t start: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Taxpayer can’t be penalised for missing notices hidden under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’: Calcutta High Court allows fresh adjudication. *  State tax officer can’t issue GST SCN beyond CBIC-assigned jurisdiction: Bombay High Court stays recovery proceedings. *  Earlier 7.5% Pre-Deposit must count towards mandatory 10% for Appeal: Uttarakhand high court quashes CESTAT Order. *  Third Parties can’t challenge GST Advance Rulings merely due to financial impact: Karnataka HC *  GST SCN generated using AI tool quashed: Punjab & Haryana High Court *  Bank Attachment Quashed as Madras HC Quashes GST Order Issued Against Deceased Person *  ITC Blocking Order for Failure to Record ‘Reason to Believe’ U/R 86A Quashed: Allahabad High Court *  Govt Extends GSTAT Appeal Filing Deadline From 30 June to July 31, 2026 *  GST Demand on RWA Stayed: Allahabad High Court Questions Taxability of Electricity Distribution to Flat Owners *  CBIC Clarifies Jurisdiction After GST Registration Transfer: Earlier Proceedings Remain Valid, New Officer to Continue Action *  GST authorities’ certification not mandatory for reimbursement, but tax payment must be proven: Karnataka HC *  Contractor can’t seek gst reimbursement through writ when contract has arbitration clause: Karnataka HC *  Unsigned Order Is No Order in Law: AP HC Quashes GST Assessment Order for Want of Officer’s Signature *  Customs Can’t Levy Rs. 1.36 Crore Cost Recovery Charges Without Proof of Full-Day Officer Deployment: CESTAT  *  12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Admits Challenge to GST Limitation Extension Notifications; Grants Protection Against Coercive Recovery *  Criminal Case Can’t Run Parallel to GST Proceedings on Same Facts: Allahabad High Court *  Allahabad High Court Stays GST Detention Order; Directs Release of Vehicle and Goods on Deposit of Rs. 1.44 Lakh *  Service Tax Can’t Be Levied on Loss-Making Contracts: Gujarat High Court *  GSTN Mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way Bill APIs; Introduces Voluntary e-Way Bill Closure Facility from August 1, 2026 *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred When Taxpayer Was Pursuing Rectification Remedy: Telangana High Court *  Absence of E-Way Bill and Transport Documents Justifies Customs Seizure U/s 110: Gauhati HC *  Madras High Court Upholds GST Late Fee and Penalty for Non-Filing of Annual Return, Dismisses Challenge  *  GST Records, Purchase Documents Sufficient to Discharge Burden Under Customs Act: CESTAT Orders Release of 3.65 Kg Gold  *  No Sugar Cess Payable on Sugar Exported Out of India: CESTAT *  Road Construction Services Exempt and SCN Time-Barred: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand Based Solely on Form 26AS  *  ITC Freeze Upheld After GST Dept Find Suppliers Were Allegedly Fake Bill-Trading Entities: Madras HC 
Subject News *  Input service benefits can’t be denied: CESTAT allows export refund despite MMTC acting as Canalising agency. *  No service tax demand without proof of service of SCN: CESTAT. *  Service tax demand quashed as dept. fails to prove service of SCN: CESTAT *  GST : Mere allegation of inadequate consideration of reply not enough to invoke writ jurisdiction: Delhi High Court *  Onerous conditions imposed for provisional release of seized imported goods shouldn’t amount to virtual denial of relief: CESTAT. *  GST SCN without alleging fraud cannot invoke sec. 74: Karnataka High Court quashes adjudication order. *  Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Merely on Form 26AS Data: CESTAT *  Revenue-Sharing with Restaurants Not Taxable as Business Support Service: CESTAT *  R. 6(3) Option Can’t Be Forced on Taxpayer; CESTAT Quashes Rs. 12.36 Crore CENVAT Credit Demand *  Excise Duty | Power Consumption Alone Can’t Prove Clandestine Manufacture: Karnataka High Court *  Madras High Court Examines DGGI’s Authority to Issue GST Penalty Orders Under Section 122, Adds DGGI as Party *  Proceedings under omitted r. 96(10) can’t survive without saving clause: andhra pradesh high court quashes gst refund recovery *  Excise duty power consumption alone can’t prove clandestine manufacture: karnataka high court *  Madras high court rules GST show cause notices must disclose grounds for invoking extended limitation *  Court Can’t Direct Extension GST Return Deadlines or Waive Interest and Penalties: Karnataka High Court *  GST Notifications Can’t Go Beyond GST Council Recommendations: Madras High Court Quashes SCN on Branded Pulses *  Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Mis-states Limitation Period: CESTAT *  No Evidence of KYC or Due Diligence Breach By Customs Broker: CESTAT Quashes Licence Revocation in Export Overvaluation Case *  Glucometers Are Chemical Analysis Instruments Classifiable Under Tariff Heading 9027: CESTAT *  Validity of Post-GST Service Tax Proceedings Upheld: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Challenge to S. 73 SCN *  Rectified GST Refund Applications Can’t Be Rejected as Time-Barred If Original Refund Claim Was Filed Within Limitation: Gujarat HC *  Service Tax Refund Can’t Be Denied as Time-Barred When Levy Itself Is Unconstitutional: Gujarat High Court *  Same Officer Can’t Act As Auditor & Adjudicator: Karnataka High Court *  Karnataka High Court Condones 324-Day Delay, Revives Customs Appeal in Jewellery Pilferage Case  *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Order Passed Ex Parte Despite Prior ITC Reversal; Lifts Bank Attachment *  Tobacco Process Doesn’t Amount to Manufacturing: Madras High Court Quashes Rs. 1.32 Crore Compensation Cess Demand  *  Recovery Notice Unsustainable After Voluntary Reversal of Unutilised Credit: CESTAT  *  GST | ‘System Generated’ SCN Without Officer Details Invalid: Allahabad HC  *  Electronic Records Without Statutory Certification Requirements Can’t Justify Undervaluation Allegations: CESTAT *  Madras High Court Stays GST Order, Finds Prima Facie Merit in Plea Against S. 74 Proceedings Based on S. 73 Intimation  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1144

Whether the appellant is entitled for availing the CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on transportation in respect of empty containers from yard to the factory for stuffing of goods and thereafter transportation charges of the containers from the factory t
Case: CENTURY RAYON V/S COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE-I
 
Citation: 2012(280) E.L.T. 561 (Tri.-Mumbai)
 
Issue:- Whether the appellant is entitled for availing the CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on transportation in respect of empty containers from yard to the factory for stuffing of goods and thereafter transportation charges of the containers from the factory to the port?
 
Brief Facts: - The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods namely Viscose Filament yarn and Chemicals falling under Chapter heading 54, 55, 59 and 28 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant has availed the CENVAT Credit in respect of goods transport services for transportation of empty container to the appellant's factory at Shahad for stuffing of export final products and retransformation of stuffed container to the port of the export. The department was of the view that CENVAT Credit in respect of empty container transportation to the factory and after stuffing sent to the port of export was not admissible to them. Accordingly, a show-cause notice dated 2nd February, 2009 was issued to them which was adjudicated by Deputy Commissioner on 2nd July 2009 denying the CENVAT Credit to the appellant and imposing the interest and penalty on the appellant. The appellant preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) against the Order-in-Original who vide the impugned order rejected their appeal and appellant is in appeal before the Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s Contention: - The appellants contended that the appellant has transported the empty containers from the yard for stuffing of the goods in the empty containers and thereafter container was sent to the port of export. Therefore, all the transportation services in respect of bringing empty containers and thereafter taking the loaded container to the port of export are in respect of the goods exported and therefore, they are eligible for availment of the CENVAT Credit of tax paid on GTA services in respect of transportation of empty containers to their factory as well as loaded container to the port of export.
He relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Balkrishna Industries Ltd. v. C.C.E., Aurangabad reported in 2011 (24) S.T.R. 433 (Tri. - Mumbai) wherein it was held that transport of export goods includes transport of empty containers from yard to the factory for stuffing of the export goods. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of C.C.E., Jaipur v. Nitin Spinners Ltd. - 2009 (16) S.T.R. 323 (Tri. - Del.) = 2012 (276) E.L.T. 112 (Tribunal), wherein the credit of services tax paid on freight of empty containers was allowed by the Tribunal. As regards the transportation of the goods from factory to the port of export, he submitted that since the goods are exported on FOB basis, the value of the exported goods includes transportation of the goods from the factory to port, therefore, they are eligible for CENVAT Credit of GTA service.
 
Respondent’s Contention: - The respondents reiterated the findings of the lower authority.
 
 
Reasoning of Judgment: - The Hon’ble Tribunal held that as regards the credit of the Service Tax paid on freight for empty containers for bringing containers from yard to the factory, the issue has been settled by the Tribunal in the case of Nitin Spinners Ltd. (supra) holding that Service Tax paid on freight for empty containers called for export of the goods is admissible. Therefore, in view of the above decision the appellant is also entitled for availment of CENVAT Credit in respect of freight charges paid by the appellant for bringing in the empty containers. As regards paying the transportation of goods in containers from the factory to the port of export, these charges are in relation to the transport of export goods. Notification No. 18 /2009-S.T., dated 7- 7-2009, exempts the taxable service received by an exporter in respect of the transport of goods from place of removal to port of export. Since the tax is exempted on these transportation charges, if tax has been paid by the appellant to department, credit of the same will be available to the exporter particularly when the value in respect of the goods is FOB basis which includes all expenses up to the port of export goods. Therefore, appellant is entitled to avail credit of Service Tax in respect of these charges also. Since amount credit is admissible to the appellant for bringing empty containers to factory and thereafter transporting the loaded containers to the port of export, mere not splitting of these charges separately will not disentitle them for CENVAT Credit.
 
Decision: - The appeal was allowed.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com