Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2012-13/1144

Whether the appellant is entitled for availing the CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on transportation in respect of empty containers from yard to the factory for stuffing of goods and thereafter transportation charges of the containers from the factory t
Case: CENTURY RAYON V/S COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE-I
 
Citation: 2012(280) E.L.T. 561 (Tri.-Mumbai)
 
Issue:- Whether the appellant is entitled for availing the CENVAT Credit of Service Tax paid on transportation in respect of empty containers from yard to the factory for stuffing of goods and thereafter transportation charges of the containers from the factory to the port?
 
Brief Facts: - The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of excisable goods namely Viscose Filament yarn and Chemicals falling under Chapter heading 54, 55, 59 and 28 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant has availed the CENVAT Credit in respect of goods transport services for transportation of empty container to the appellant's factory at Shahad for stuffing of export final products and retransformation of stuffed container to the port of the export. The department was of the view that CENVAT Credit in respect of empty container transportation to the factory and after stuffing sent to the port of export was not admissible to them. Accordingly, a show-cause notice dated 2nd February, 2009 was issued to them which was adjudicated by Deputy Commissioner on 2nd July 2009 denying the CENVAT Credit to the appellant and imposing the interest and penalty on the appellant. The appellant preferred an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) against the Order-in-Original who vide the impugned order rejected their appeal and appellant is in appeal before the Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s Contention: - The appellants contended that the appellant has transported the empty containers from the yard for stuffing of the goods in the empty containers and thereafter container was sent to the port of export. Therefore, all the transportation services in respect of bringing empty containers and thereafter taking the loaded container to the port of export are in respect of the goods exported and therefore, they are eligible for availment of the CENVAT Credit of tax paid on GTA services in respect of transportation of empty containers to their factory as well as loaded container to the port of export.
He relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Balkrishna Industries Ltd. v. C.C.E., Aurangabad reported in 2011 (24) S.T.R. 433 (Tri. - Mumbai) wherein it was held that transport of export goods includes transport of empty containers from yard to the factory for stuffing of the export goods. He also relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of C.C.E., Jaipur v. Nitin Spinners Ltd. - 2009 (16) S.T.R. 323 (Tri. - Del.) = 2012 (276) E.L.T. 112 (Tribunal), wherein the credit of services tax paid on freight of empty containers was allowed by the Tribunal. As regards the transportation of the goods from factory to the port of export, he submitted that since the goods are exported on FOB basis, the value of the exported goods includes transportation of the goods from the factory to port, therefore, they are eligible for CENVAT Credit of GTA service.
 
Respondent’s Contention: - The respondents reiterated the findings of the lower authority.
 
 
Reasoning of Judgment: - The Hon’ble Tribunal held that as regards the credit of the Service Tax paid on freight for empty containers for bringing containers from yard to the factory, the issue has been settled by the Tribunal in the case of Nitin Spinners Ltd. (supra) holding that Service Tax paid on freight for empty containers called for export of the goods is admissible. Therefore, in view of the above decision the appellant is also entitled for availment of CENVAT Credit in respect of freight charges paid by the appellant for bringing in the empty containers. As regards paying the transportation of goods in containers from the factory to the port of export, these charges are in relation to the transport of export goods. Notification No. 18 /2009-S.T., dated 7- 7-2009, exempts the taxable service received by an exporter in respect of the transport of goods from place of removal to port of export. Since the tax is exempted on these transportation charges, if tax has been paid by the appellant to department, credit of the same will be available to the exporter particularly when the value in respect of the goods is FOB basis which includes all expenses up to the port of export goods. Therefore, appellant is entitled to avail credit of Service Tax in respect of these charges also. Since amount credit is admissible to the appellant for bringing empty containers to factory and thereafter transporting the loaded containers to the port of export, mere not splitting of these charges separately will not disentitle them for CENVAT Credit.
 
Decision: - The appeal was allowed.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com