Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3553

Whether the amount collected towards Local Area Development Fund, which is kept separately and used for development of the affected area as per the guidelines of MNRE, can be treated as not a supply as per the provision of CGST Act 2017?
M/s. Karnataka Solar Power Development Corporation Limited-KAR ADGR 10/2020 Dated 18.03.2020
Issue:
  1. Whether the amount collected towards Local Area Development Fund, which is kept separately and used for development of the affected area as per the guidelines of MNRE, can be treated as not a supply as per the provision of CGST Act 2017?
  2. If it is treated as supply, what will be the HSN/SAC code under which it would be levied to tax?
  3. Without prejudice to the above, if it is treated as Supply, will it be exempt as per Sl No.3 or 3A of Notification No. 12/2017-CE as the activities to be carried out are covered under Articles 243G and/or Articles 243 W of the constitution of India?
 
Brief Facts: The applicant claims to be a Government Company in terms of Section 2(45) of Companies Act 2013; acts as Solar Power Park Developer (SPPD) and Involved in creation of infrastructure to facilitate Solar Power Developers (SPDs) to establish solar power generating units 86 to enable supply of solar power generated for general public at reasonable cost; undertakes the said project under the approval of Ministry of New 86 Renewable Energy (MNRE) and functions as per the guidelines of the said MNRE.
The applicant, for the aforesaid project, obtained lands on lease from the farmers of five villages for a period of 28 years and sub-leased the said lands to the SPDs, as per their requirement on the basis of solar power generating capacity, for 28 years to install the solar panels for generation of solar power. The applicant collects rent along with the applicable GST from the said SPDs. The applicant also required to collect an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- per MW capacity, from each SPD after commissioning of solar project, in five yearly installments of Rs 1,00,000/-each, under the guidelines of MNRE, towards Local Area Development Fund, intended to rehabilitation of the affected area.
The LAD fund so collected by the applicant is kept in a separate account by  the applicant and interest, if any, earned on such amounts also added to the said fund. The LAD fund is used for development works of the said villages, under village panchayats, by the Committee formed by the Government of Karnataka
Applicant’s Contention:    There is no supply made by the applicant to the SPDs with reference to the LAD Fund; no benefit is derived by the Applicant in the said transaction; the amount is collected as per the guidelines of MNRE & is used for only village development works; the said amount is not against any supply of goods/services made by the applicant to the SPDs.
 
The transaction does not get covered by the definition of Supply, in terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act 2017; the activity is not in the course or furtherance of business. Therefore the activity can’t be subjected to GST as it is not in the nature of supply.
Respondent’s Contention and reasoning of Judgment:
  1. It is admitted that,  the applicant has given on rental basis to SPDs and collecting the annual lease rent, which amount to ”Supply” in terms of Section 7(1)(a) of CGST Act 2017 and is leviable to GST under section 9(1) of the said Act.
  2. Valuation to be done as per section 15(2)(a) of the CGST Act 2017 that any amount of  any taxes, duties, cesses, fees and charges levied under any law for the time being in force other than the GST related Acts are includible in the value of supply. The amount is collected by applicant from the SPDs under guidelines, issued by Ministry of New & Renewable Energy, Government of India. There is not doubt that amount is collected by applicant for LAD fund are on account of supply made by the applicant and directly linked in the rent /lease payable and thus are includable in the value of rental/lease service, being provided by the applicant.
  3. The amount collected by the applicant towards LAD fund form part of value of the rent/lease service and the said service is covered under SAC 997212.  
  4. The said amount towards LADS fund by applicant is not a separate transaction but linked to the supply of rental/lease service as discussed the above paras. The exemption is available to applicant in case of pure service provided to Central Government, State Government and Local authority under serial no. 3 or 3A of notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax Rate by way of any activity in relation to any function under article 243G or 243W of the Constitution of India. In the above case, the applicant is collecting the LAD Fund from SPDs by way rental/lease service including applicable GST Rate and are not provided to any service directly to Central Government, State Government and local authority.
  5. In the instant case, the applicant has utilized the said fund for Local Area Dvelopment under Panchayats as direction given by Committee of Government, Karnataka. The said transaction is not covered under “Supply” under Section 7 of CGST Act because the government is not collect any considered against the above work and only give to instruction to applicant for utilize the said amount for Development of Local Area under Panchayats. Hence, the said activity is not covered under RCM.
 
Prepared by- VIJAY SINGH
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com