Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Laws/2011-12/1004

Whether tax paid on mediclaim insurance and group insurance policy taken for employees or staffs deniable as cenvat credit or not?

Prepared By:
CA. Rajani Thanvi &
Bharat Rathore

 
 
 
Case: - M/s Fiamm Minda Automotive Ltd. Vs CCE, Delhi-IIII
 
Citation: - 2011-TIOL-394-CESTAT-DEL.
 
Issue:-
 
  1.  Whether tax paid on mediclaim insurance and group insurance policy taken for employees or staffs deniable as cenvat credit or not?
  2. Whether credit deniable on CHA service where the goods are exported on FOB basis and ownership retailed till delivery of goods on board the vessel?
  3. Whether Rent a cab service use for transport of vendors and clients from guest house to factory, credit of service tax paid deniable or not??
  4. Whether insuring export of goods relates to business activity, tax paid on insurance of export goods deniable or not??
 
 
Brief Facts:- Appellant had taken credit on various services
  1. Tax paid on mediclaim insurance and group insurance policy taken for employees/ Staff,
  2. CHA services when goods are exported on FOB basis and ownership retailed till delivery of goods on board the vessel,
  3. Rent a cab service utilized for transport of vendors and clients from guest house to factory, and
  4. Tax paid on insurance of export goods.
 

Assessee filed an appeal against commissioner (Appeals) order and department also filed appeal against the same order in respect of certain aspects, which has been decided against the department.
 

Department’s Contention: - Department contention on each of the dispute are as follows:-
 
  1. Group Insurance/ mediclaim Policy:- The department aggrieved that the credit of the service tax paid on mediclaim insurance and group insurance policy taken for their employees/ staff who are not covered by the ESI has been disallowed on the ground that the same cannot be considered as input service in terms of the activities relating to business. The department also said that it is not mandatory for the appellants to take mediclaim policy and accident policy for their employees it is only a welfare measure and therefore it is not treated as business activities.
  2. CHA Service:- The Department challenging the allowing of credit on service tax paid on CHA services.
  3. Rent a Cab service: The Department aggrieved that the credit of the service of rent a cab on the ground that part of service has been utilised for transporting vendors and clients from the guest house to factory and vice versa.
  4. General Insurance for exporting the goods: The department challenging the allowing of credit on service tax paid on General insurance for exporting the goods on the ground that such activities should be treated only as additional business activities. The department pursue that this activity
 
Assessee’s Contention:  Assessee contention on each of the dispute are as follows:-
 
  1. Group Insurance/ mediclaim Policy:- The assessee submit that in respect of category of employees and officials who are not covered by the ESI, they are required to make compensation in the event of illness/ accident. As a prudent business proposition, they incurred expenses by taking mediclaim insurance and personal accident insurance and these expenditures are clearly in the course of business activities and should be treated as input service.
  2. CHA Service:- The assessee submit that as per Para 8.2 of the Boards Circular No. 97/8/2007 dated 23.08.07 the supply of goods for export was on FOB basis and there fore, ownership, possession associated with obligation relating to loss or damage of the goods till they are delivered on board the ship rest with the party and therefore CHA services should be treated as input service.
  3. Rent a Cab Service: The assessee submit that vendors and clients have been transported from the guest hous to factory and vice versa these activities should be treated as business activities in relation to the clearance of final products from the assessee’s factory and the clients are to enable to sell their products and naturally part of the business activities.
  4. General Insurance for exporting the goods:- The assessee submit that insurance for exporting goods is business activity and service tax credit on the same should not be denied to us. 
 
 
 

Reasoning of Judgment: -  The Hon’ble Tribunal heard the submissions of both side and the findings are as under on each of dispute:-
 

  1. Group Insurance/ mediclaim Policy:- The Tribunal held that the issue stands settled against the department by the decision given in Stanzen Toyotetsu India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE, Bangalore [2009 TIOL-697-CESTAT-Bang]. There is a merit in the appeal filed by the assessee.
  2. CHA Service:- The Tribunal held that the assessee has shown that the goods have been exported on FOB basis and that the ownership is retained till the delivery of the goos on board the vessel until receipt of bill of lading.
  3. Rent a Cab Service: The Tribunal do not find any valid reason for interfere with the order of the  Commissioner (Appeals) in so far as the same relates to the extending the benefit of credit on the service tax involved in the rent – a – cab even when the cars used for transporting vendors and client.
  4. General Insurance for exporting the goods:- The Tribunal held that service tax paid on insurance relating the insurance of export goods treating the same as part of business activity. And do not find any valid reason for interfere with the order of the Commissioner (Appeals)

 

 
 
 

Decision: - Appeal of the department is rejected and the appeal of the assessee allowed.

---------------

 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com