Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2013-14/2051

Whether service tax leviable on storage of tanks in which helium gas is imported when excise duty already paid on gas including tank?

Case:- INOX AIR PRODUCTS LTD VsCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, RAIGAD

Citation:-2013-TIOL-1858-CESTAT-MUM

Brief facts:-The demand was confirmed on the ground that the applicants are receiving storage and warehousing service from the foreign service provider hence the applicants are liable to pay service tax on the reverse charge mechanism. In respect of appeal No. ST/87630/13, the demand is confirmed on the ground that the applicants are providing storage and warehousing service to their client hence the applicants are liable to pay service tax in this regard. The applicants were importing helium gas which is to be transported under a controlled temperature. The helium gas is imported in the containers and further appropriate customs duty is paid on the helium gas and thereafter the helium gas imported is transported to the factory of the applicants and the imported helium gas is used in the manufacture of other gases. The tank was subsequently re-exported within six months.

Appellant’s contention:-The contention of the applicants was that the applicants were importing helium gas which is to be transported under a controlled temperature. The helium gas is imported in the containers and further appropriate customs duty is paid on the helium gas and thereafter the helium gas imported is transported to the factory of the applicants and the imported helium gas is used in the manufacture of other gases. The tank was subsequently re-exported within six months. The contention was that the tank was for storage of helium gas and the applicants are not receiving any storage or warehousing service from the foreign service provider hence the demand is not sustainable.
In respect of the demand as provider of service of storage and warehousing, the contention is that the gases which are kept by the applicants are cleared on payment of appropriate duty including the storage charges of Rs.35,000/- per month. The gas is cleared in the tanks and the tanks were stored at the premises of the applicants and the applicants are receiving Rs.35,000/- per month as a rental of the tank. On the rental of the tank, the applicants are paying appropriate excise duty along with VAT. The applicants produced copies of invoices under which excise duty is paid on rental charges. The applicants relied upon the earlier stay order dated 4.6.2012 in appeal No. ST/214/12 - (2012-TIOL-1077-CESTAT-MUM), where the Tribunal allowed the waiver of dues which were confirmed on the same grounds. In view of the fact that the applicants are paying excise duty and VAT on the rental of the tanks, the demand is not sustainable.

Respondent’s contention:- The Revenue relied upon the findings of the lower authority and submitted that as the applicants are importing gas in the tanks and the gas is stored in the tanks in the factory of the applicants, therefore the applicants are liable to pay service tax on reverse charge mechanism. In respect of the rental charges received by the applicants in spite of the tanks in which the gas is being supplied to the customer, the contention is that the same is not liable for excise duty and the applicants are liable to pay service tax. The Revenue relied upon the terms and conditions of the agreement entered into between the applicants and their clients to submit that the responsibility of the applicants in respect of supply of gas upto the point of vaporizer in the factory of the applicants, therefore the applicants are liable to pay service tax.

Reasoning of judgment:-  It was found that as the applicants are importing helium gas in the tanks and the tanks are subsequently re-exported. There is no evidence to show that the supplier of gas has any responsibility in respect of the gas exported in tanks in the factory of the applicants.
In respect of the rental charges received by the applicants from their clients in respect of the tanks in which the gas is supplied, it was found that the applicants are paying excise duty on the rental charges; therefore we find that the applicants have made out a strong case in their favour. Therefore, the pre-deposit of the dues is waived and recovery of the same is stayed during the pendency of the appeals. Stay petition allowed.

Decision:-Stay application allowed.

Comment:- The essence of this case is that when excise duty is paid inclusive of rental charges, service tax cannot be demanded under storage and warehousing services under reverse charge mechanism. It is a settled position that excise duty and service tax cannot be levied simultaneously for a particular activity. 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com