Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2780

Whether service tax is payable on interest on loan?

Case:-SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUS. & C. EX.

Citation:-2015 (37) S.T.R. 491 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief Facts:-The facts of the case are that the appellant is Non-banking Finance Company and engaged in the activity of providing services of hire purchase and financial leasing of commercial vehicles. The service provided by the applicant having three components
(a) Principal amount
(b) Interest amount
(c) Processing/Management fees.
 The applicant is paying Service Tax on processing/management fees of the service provided by them. They are not paying Service tax on the principal and interest amount. Revenue is of the view that as the applicant is engaged in financial leasing service, therefore, as per Notification No. 4/2006, dated 1-3-2006, the applicant is entitled for 90% exemption of the interest charges by them and remaining 10% collected by them is includible in the taxable service. Therefore three show cause notices were issued for the impugned period. The adjudication took place and the ld. Commissioner confirmed the demand of Service Tax along with interest and penalties were also loaded on the applicants. The applicant is praying for waiver of pre-deposit of the impugned demands.

Appellant contentions:-The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that as per decision of Leasing & Financial Service Companies v. Union of India reported in 2010 (20) S.T.R. 417 (S.C.), the Hon'ble Apex Court has held that applicants are nothing but a company engaged in the business of financing loan and as per Finance Act, 1994, explanation of Section 67 of the Act, interest on loan is not includible in taxable service. He further submits that in 2006, Service Tax Valuation Rules were introduced and as per Rule 6(2)(iv) of the said Rules, the interest on loan was not includible in taxable service. Therefore, the applicants are not required to pay Service Tax on interest components as demanded by the ld. Commissioner in the impugned order. Therefore waiver of pre-deposit be granted.

Respondent contentions:-The ld. AR strongly opposed the contention of the ld. Counsel and submits that the applicant is engaged in the activity of financial leasing service and the Notification No. 4/2006; dated 1-3-2006 clearly provides exemption upto 90% of the interest collected by them. Therefore as per the notification, they are required to pay Service Tax on 10% of interest collected by them. Therefore, for the impugned demands, the applicant is directed to make pre-deposit at this stage.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- On perusal of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Association of Leasing & Financial Service Companies v. Union of India (supra), various provisions of Finance Act and Service Tax Rules, prima facie we do agree with the contention of the Id. Counsel for the applicant that applicant is engaged in the activity of giving loan for earning interest through leasing the vehicles under financial leasing services. As per explanation to Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994, interest on loan is exempted from Service Tax is not to be included in the taxable service and same has been followed by Rule 6(2)(iv) of the Service Tax Valuation Rules, 2004 (sic). In these circumstances, prima facie we find that applicants have made out a case for complete waiver of pre-deposit. Therefore, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit of entire amount of Service Tax, interest and penalty and stay recovery thereof during the pendency of the appeals.

Decision:-Stay granted.

Comment:-The crux of the case is that as per explanation to section 67 of the finance Act 1994,  interest on loan is exempted from the service tax and it is not included in the taxable service. This is also substantiated by the rule 6(2)(iv) of the service tax valuation rules,2004. Hence, unconditional stay was granted for service tax demand for interest on loan.

Prepared By:- Anash Kachaliya

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com