Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2842

Whether service tax credit on Access Deficit Charges admissible?

Case:-COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI VERSUS AIRCEL CELLULAR LTD.
 
Citation:- 2015 (39) S.T.R. 394 (Mad.)
 
Brief facts:-This civil miscellaneous appeal is filed by the Revenue as against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal [2013 (32) S.T.R. 618 (Tri.-Chennai)], allowing the appeal filed by the assessee granting the benefit of Cenvat credit on the Service Tax paid on Access Deficit Charges to BSNL, raising the following substantial question of law :
“Whether the Tribunal has fallen into error by holding that Access Deficit Charge is an input service as per the definition in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004?”
The brief facts of the case are as follows :
The assessee in this case availed credit of Service Tax paid on various input services used in providing the taxable service. One of the credits so availed is the Service Tax paid on Access Deficit Charges (ADC) to BSNL. The said ADC is charged by BSNL on the basis of number of calls made by the assessee’s subscribers to BSNL at remote locations. The Service Tax was charged by BSNL for the ADC charges and the assessee paid Service Tax thereon. The Department collected the same without demur accepting the same as for telecom services. The Department denied the input credit taken by the assessee on the ground that what is provided by BSNL is a facility and not telecom services. The Department was of the view that Access Deficit Charges are paid by the respondent/assessee for fulfilment of a license obligation and are in no way connected with providing output service. Hence, they are not entitled to take credit of Service Tax paid on Access Deficit Charges. Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the respondent. The adjudicating authority took the view that it was only a facility extended to connect the end user by BSNL where the networking facility was not feasible for the respondent. Consequently, the adjudicating authority denied the Service Tax credit on the payment towards ADC holding as follows :
“From the foregoing, it would emerge that ADC charges are levied by BSNL to access mostly on rural/remote areas where there is no connectivity by the service provider. Hence it can be inferred that it is only a FACILITY extended, facilitating the service provider to connect the end-user by the BSNL where the networking facility is not feasible by the assessee in question. That apart by rendering the ADC facility, by the BSNL to the assessee cannot be construed by any stretch of imagination as a service, whereby the assessee treat this as an input service qualifies for rendering his output service. This being the situation, availing the Service Tax credit on payment of ADC charges is incorrect in terms of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.”
Aggrieved by the Order-in-Original, the assessee pursued the matter before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal took the view that the service provided by the BSNL to the assessee is a telecom service as defined under Section 65(109a) of Finance Act, 1994 and held as follows :
“We have considered the arguments on both sides. We are not in agreement with the argument that BSNL is providing only a facility and not any service to the appellant. After classifying the facility provided by BSNL as “Telecom services” and collecting the Service Tax under such head, Revenue cannot turn around and argue that this is not a service. Even otherwise, we are convinced that the service provided by BSNL to the appellant is a Telecom service as defined in Section 65(109a) of Finance Act, 1994. Since this service is required by the appellant for providing output services to appellant’s customers, it is obviously an ‘input service’ as per definition at Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to take Cenvat credit on such services. Therefore, we allow this appeal of the appellant in respect of the first issue.”
Being aggrieved by the order of the Tribunal, the Revenue has filed the present appeal before this Court.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- Heard learned standing counsel appearing for the Revenue and the learned counsel appearing for the assessee and perused the materials placed before this Court.
The interpretation in this case revolves around Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 which reads as follows :
“Rule 2. Definitions.- In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires,-
(a)        ……
            ……
(l)         “input service” means any service, -
(i)         used by a provider of taxable service for providing an output service, or
(ii)        used by the manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products and clearance of final products up to the place of removal,
and includes services used in relation to setting up, modernization, renovation or repairs of a factory, premises of provider of output service or an office relating to such factory or premises, advertisement or sales promotion, market research, storage up to the place of removal, procurement of inputs, activities relating to business, such as accounting, auditing, financing, recruitment and quality control, coaching and training, computer networking, credit rating, share registry and security, inward transportation of inputs or capital goods and outward transportation up to the place of removal.”
In this case, they find that the finding of fact by the Tribunal that the facility provided by BSNL to the assessee, who, in turn, provide such services to their subscribers, is nothing but a telecom service is justified. The Department has not produced any material to contradict this finding of fact.
A plain reading of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 makes it clear that the assessee in this case is the user of the service provided by BSNL and that service is used for providing output service to the customers of the assessee. Therefore, the definition squarely applies to the facts of the present case. Since the assessee has satisfied the requirement of Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the Department was not justified in taking a different view contrary to the said provision.
In the light of the above, they find no reason to interfere with the order of the Tribunal. Accordingly, the question of law is answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. Consequently, this civil miscellaneous appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
 
Decision:- Appeal dismissed
 
Comment:-The analogy of the case is that Service provided by BSNL to other telecom service providers for connecting their customers to persons in remote locations, held as input service for the other telecom service providers by Tribunal. Such service having been used for providing output service by telecom service provider is covered in definition of ‘input service’. Therefore, the appellant is entitled to take Cenvat credit on such services.

Prepared by:- Monika Tak
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com