Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law /2016-17/3298

Whether service provided by courier agency outside India leviable to service tax?

Case:-FIRST FLIGHT COURIERS LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-II
 
Citation- 2016 (44) S.T.R. 474 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief Facts-M/s. First Flight Couriers Ltd. in an appeal against Order-in-Original No: 38/ST/SB/2011-12, dated 29th March, 2012 passed by the Commissioner (TAR), Mumbai, confirming tax of Rs. 2,02,44,508/- for 2008-09 and Rs. 1,49,71,666/- for 2009-10, along with interest, and imposing penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of Finance Act, 1994.
Appellant’s Contention- The appellant is registered as provider of ‘courier’ service and ‘air travel agency’ service. The case of Revenue is that the appellant has entered into memorandum of understanding with counterparts in Singapore, Europe, USA and with Al Niyadi Services Est. for ‘last mile’ delivery of packages booked by their customers in India. According to the appellant, the services received by them are not taxable as per Section 66A of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 3 of the Taxation of Service (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006. The appellant also submits that they have discharged the service tax on the entire consideration received from customers in India and that the payments to the overseas correspondents are expenses met from these receipts. Appellant contends that Rule 3 of the Taxation of Service (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006 requires payment of tax only when a service is either partly or fully performed in India whereas the services which are rendered by their overseas correspondents are performed entirely at the destination. Appellant relies on the decision of the Tribunal in Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Ahmedabad [2009 (16) S.T.R. 748 (Tri.-Ahmd.)]. Further, the appellant claims that it is provider of a service to customers in India and not a deemed provider of service in relation to the overseas correspondents.
Respondent’s Contention- The learned Authorised Representative reiterates the contents of the impugned order.
 
The adjudicating authority has proceeded on the presumption that any service rendered by an overseas entity is liable to tax under Section 66A of Finance Act, 1994 :
“A plain reading of the above reveals that the Noticee and the receiving party [First Flight (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.] will make arrangements at their respective ends to release the load sent by the other party and arrange to deliver the consignments promptly. The payments will necessarily be required to be made by book adjustments and it is this sum which is reflected as ‘International service charges’. The Noticee is apparently trying to mislead the department by seeking shelter under the Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules by stating that no part of service stands rendered in India.”
Reasoning of Judgement- The issue in dispute lies within the narrow compass of applicability of Section 66A of Finance Act, 1994 to the payments made by the appellant to some overseas entities for services provided at the destination in relation to the packages booked by the customers of the appellant in India. Section 66A of Finance Act, 1994 is intended to place burden of tax on the recipient of the service in India in relation to the services that are taxable if rendered by an overseas service provider. The manner in which each of the taxable services are deemed to be received in India is laid down in the Taxation of Service (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006. Therefore, the leviability of a tax in the hands of recipient of a service will necessarily have to be in accordance to the provisions of the said Rules. Mere reliance on Section 66A of Finance Act, 1994 without reference to the relevant provisions of the Rules is not sufficient to sustain a demand for service tax. The original authority also appears to have treated the transfer of package from the Indian consignor to the overseas consignees to be the service that is liable to tax. The booking of package by customers in India is liable to tax under Section 65(105)(f). The tax on charges levied from customers is discharged by the appellant. In the course of rendering this service, appellant uses a service provider at the destination to complete the delivery. This is a separate service rendered to the Indian service provider outside the country and for which expenses are incurred by the appellant. The issue is whether that expense paid by the appellant is liable to tax under Finance Act, 1994. We find that the impugned order has not identified the service rendered to the appellant by the overseas entity. Rule 3 of the said Rules identifies and categorises the services as destination-based, performance-based or beneficiary-based. Without a categorisation of the service, it is well-nigh impossible to invoke Rule 3.
 
The services rendered by the overseas entities to the appellant is a performance-based service and, to become taxable, requires that at least some portion of that be rendered in India. The role of the overseas entities commences upon the landing of the packages at the airport of destination. From there, the overseas correspondents ensure delivery of such packages to the consignees. It is therefore, amply clear that the role of the overseas entity commences and ends beyond the border of India. It therefore, cannot be said to be in conformity with Rule 3 of the Taxation of Service (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006.
 
In view of the above, we find that the service rendered by the overseas entity is not liable to service tax under Section 66A of Finance Act, 1994. We therefore, allow the appeal with consequential relief, if any.
 
Decision- Appeal Allowed.
 
Comment- The crux of the case is that the courier services provided outside India is not leviable to service tax under reverse charge mechanism. This is for the reason that the service has been entirely performed outside India.
 
Prepared by- Akshit Bhandari
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com