Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Service tax penalty can’t survive when assessee acted on dept.’s own view of non-taxability: Delhi High Court. *  GST section 74 extended limitation questionable when form 26AS mismatch was already known: Karnataka High Court grants interim relief. *  CGST demand prima facie impermissible after state GST settlement under section 128A: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court asks GSTAT to sympathetically consider delay as taxpayers pursued remedy before wrong forum. *  Supreme Court stays Tripura High Court ruling protecting genuine buyers from ITC denial over supplier’s GST default. *  Diary entries alone can’t prove clandestine removal of goods: CESTAT quashes excise penalty on steel trader. *  Customs could investigate preferential tariff claims even before sec. 28DA: Delhi High Court. *  Customs dept. relied on fake AI generated case laws: supreme court quashes Rs. 425.28 crore penalty. *  No GST exemption in affiliation and annual registration charges for admission or conduct Of examinations: GSTAT. *  Mere invoices, cheque payments insufficient to establish genuine movement of goods: GSTAT restores Rs. 43.44 lakh ITC demand. *  Consolidated GST show cause notice covering multiple financial years is not without jurisdiction: Delhi High Court. *  Construction of independent houses on separate plots not taxable as ‘Residential Complex’ without common facilities: CESTAT. *  GST penalty exceeding statutory maximum unsustainable; Allahabad High Court quashes ? 50,000/- penalty after taxpayer filed return and paid late fee. *  GST order against standard chartered bank passed without hearing set aside by Bombay High Court. *  Retracted statements can’t be relied upon without cross-examination: CESTAT quashes gold confiscation. *  Burden to prove misclassification lies on customs department: CESTAT. *  CESTAT quashes Rs. 98 lakh excise demand on clearance of used refractory brick scrap. *  Service tax demand on irrigation works quashed: Karnataka High Court rules sale of goods component not taxable as service. *  GSTAT restores tax and penalty for transporting iron scrap without E-way bill citing intent to evade tax. *  Madras High Court stays GST recovery from directors without opportunity to show cause under section 89. *  Madras high court stays GST recovery notice against directors; finds prima facie case on applicability of section 79(1)(c). *  Procedural lapses can’t justify harsh punishment without serious customs breach: CESTAT quashes customs broker licence revocation. *  Service tax payable on land leasing and sports complex charges: CESTAT. *  Settled customs dispute can’t be reopened through Article 226 challenge to interest liability: Delhi High Court. *  Mere facilitation of customs clearance can’t establish knowledge of smuggling: Madras High Court. *  GST registration cancellation stayed: Allahabad High Court questions 99% ITC utilisation cap under rule 86B. *  Composition scheme lapses automatically on crossing Rs. 1.5 crore turnover: GSTAT. *  Gujarat High Court quashes GST cancellation orders after officer relied on non-existent AI-generated case laws. *  Importers liable for customs duty benefits availed through manipulated scrips: Delhi High Court. *  Procedural E-way bill lapse alone can’t justify penalty where genuine transaction and absence of tax evasion are established: GSTAT.
Subject News *  Documentary evidence dominates probe, further custody unwarranted: mumbai court grants bail in Rs. 22.44 crore customs duty evasion case. *  Business premises can’t remain sealed for non-participation in GST search: Allahabad High Court. *  GST pre-deposit must be refunded proportionately when taxpayer partly succeeds in appeal: Bombay High Court. *  Supreme Court grants 30 days to file GST appeal; keeps pre-deposit issue open due to deposit in parallel CGST proceedings. *  GST demand can’t exceed amount proposed in SCN: Allahabad High Court quashes Rs. 20.47 Crore order. *  Hundreds-of-crores GST demand and heavy 10% pre-deposit no ground to bypass statutory appeal: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Delhi High Court refuses to entertain challenge to gold confiscation due to statutory appeal remedy and unexplained delay. *  Procedural error in customs broker licence inquiry can be rectified through remand: Delhi High Court. *  GSTR-2A mismatch alone can’t justify ITC denial without invoice-wise verification; personal hearing mandatory: GSTAT. *  GST order passed without uploading personal hearing notices violates sec. 75(4): Allahabad High Court. *  TAX EVASION - Sec. 74 GST SCN quashed for not spelling out fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression: Allahabad High Court. *  STPI’s SOFTEX certification and NoC charges taxable as business support services: CESTAT. *  Suspicion can’t replace proof: CESTAT quashes penalty in alleged gold-smuggling operation. *   Limitation runs from communication of order: Madras High Court upholds rejection of delayed GST Appeals. *  Rajasthan High Court quashes GST demand over unsigned show cause notice. *  ITC recovery upheld where supplier failed to deposit GST: Rajasthan High Court. *  Customs commissioner’s empowered to make port trust liable for duty on pilfered goods: Supreme Court. *  Rectification proceedings can’t be used to challenge an uncontested GST assessment through a writ petition: Andhra Pradesh HC. *  GST proceedings against deceased proprietor unsustainable without notice to legal heir: GSTAT. *  Mere availment of ineligible self-assessed ITC doesn’t amount to suppression without evidence of fraud or wilful misstatement: GSTAT. *  Disposal of mining overburden by entity authorised by mining lease holder constitutes taxable service: CESTAT. *  Toll plaza data not mandatory for ITC refund: GSTAT. *  Disputed GST fraud allegations require investigation: Punjab and Haryana High Court makes interim bail absolute in alleged fraud and GST fraud case. *  Non-manufacturer contractor liable to deposit excess excise duty collected from buyer: CESTAT. *  GST order can’t reject taxpayer’s reply as “not satisfactory” without reasons: Madhya Pradesh High Court. *  Uncorroborated statements can’t establish alleged diversion of duty-free goods: CESTAT. *  Erection services were not liable to service tax prior to 10th september 2004: CESTAT. *  Sec. 74 GST notice must spell out statutory ingredients for invoking extended tax demand proceedings: Allahabad High Court. *  No jurisdictional bar under section 6(2)(b) in parallel CGST SGST proceedings: Delhi High Court refuses to bypass GST appeal remedy. *  Madras High Court remits GST demand for fresh adjudication after taxpayer claims it was unaware of SCN following business closure.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3575

Whether selling of religious books attract GST? If taxable, what would be the rate of GST and HSN Code & If exempted the category of exempted goods and HSN Code?
Ideal Industrial Synergy Solutions Private Limited Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 26/2019 dated 23.04.2020
Brief Facts: The applicant is in the business of carrying out manufacturing, designing, printing all types of confectionaries, brochures, stickers, aseptic bags, labels, hang-tags d pocket flashers, textile accessories like leather patches, Jeans button, etc.
The applicant states that he is involved in the printing and selling of religious books for various Islamic educational institutions across India and is desirous to know the applicability of tax on the transactions.
 
Issue: - Whether selling of religious books attract GST?  If taxable, what would be the rate of GST and HSN Code & If exempted the category of exempted goods and HSN Code?
Appellant’s Contention: -The applicant contended that they are involved in the printing and supply of goods where the content is provided by the religious heads and they are printing the books and selling the same to the Madarasas. The books are not sold to the content providers but are sold to the religious schools as per the orders received from such schools.
The billing is also done to the Madarasas and the books are also supplied to the Madarasas. The Madarasas are not involved in the supply of content and this is received from the religious heads.
 
Reasoning of Advance Ruling: - It is found that the supply is made by the applicant to the Madarasas for a consideration and the contract is for the supply of books for consideration. This being in the course of business would amount to a supply of books as per sub-section (1) of section 7 of the CGST, 2017. There is no direct link between the recipient of books and the supplier of the content and the final product is supplied to the recipient of books and the content provider has no role to play in the selection of the recipient or the sale. Hence it is simply sale of books.
Further, the printed books are covered under HSN code 4901 1010 and are covered under entry no. 119 of Notification No.2/2017- Central Tax (Rate)dated 28.06.2017 and hence are exempt from tax under the CGST Act, 2017
 
 
 
Ruling: -
1. The supply of books by the applicant to the religious schools are supply of printed books which is covered under HSN Code 4901 and is exempt from tax as they are covered under following entries
a. Under the CGST Act, entry no. 119 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax (Rate)dated 28.06.2017
b. Under the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, entry no.119 of Notification (02/2017) No. FD 48 CSL 2017 dated 29.06.2017
c. Under the IGST Act, entry no. 119 of Notification No. 2/2017 -Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017
 
Conclusion: - Purely sale of manufacture or printing religious books to religious schools/institutions are not chargeable under GST due to covered entry no. 119 of Notification No. 02/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated. 28.06.2017.

Comment- The Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in case of Shrimad Rajchandra Adhyatmik Satsang Sadhana Kendra has recently held that the income earned by religious organisations from sale of Books, DVD’s, magazines and other such materials along with food will attract GST, since they don’t count as “Charitable activities”. All such activities will be treated as business activities on which GST will have to be charged and paid. As per the GST Act, the advancement of religion or spirituality is exempt from GST as a charitable activity, but there is no specific exemption listed out in the Act in respect of the incidental or ancillary services by a trust. To qualify for any exemption, it is necessary that applicant qualify for each condition without any dependence on third party.
Prepared by CA Mahesh Parmar
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com