Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2014-15/2439

Whether security services provided by Police department liable to service tax?

Case:-MUMBAI POLICE Vs COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, MUMBAI-I
 
Citation:-2014-TIOL-2173-CESTAT-MUM

Brief Facts:- The appeal and stay petition are directed against Order-in-Original no. 97-98/STC-I/SKS/13-14dated 5/11/13 passed by Commissioner, Service Tax-I, Mumbai. Vide the impugned order, theld. Adjudicating authority has confirmed a service tax demand of Rs.13,54,03,947/- againstMumbai police along with interest thereon and has also imposed a penalty amount of Rs.10.88crores. The period of demand is from 01/5/2006 to 31/02/2012. In the said order, the ld.Commissioner has come to the conclusion that the services provided by the Mumbai Police to individuals or organizations in conducting various private and public events come under thepurview of 'Security Agency Services'. Aggrieved of the same, the appellant is before Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s Contention:- The ld. Consultant for the appellant submits that, the aforesaid services are undertaken bythe Mumbai Police in terms of the provisions of section 47 & 48 of the Mumbai Police Act, 1951.In terms of the aforesaid provisions, the Competent Authority, on an application by any person,may depute additional number of Police to keep the peace, to preserve order and to enforce anyof the provisions of the said Act for the period specified therein and the cost of such provisionsshall be borne by the person who makes the application. Similarly, under section 48,employment of additional Police is made at large works which is being carried on or any publicamusement, which is being conducted, if it is likely to impede the traffic or to attract largenumber of people and the behaviour or a reasonable apprehension of the behaviour of thepersons employed necessitate employment of additional Police, the Competent authority shallemploy the police force at such place for such period and the cost of such deployment has to beborne by the person, who undertakes the work. The ld. Consultant submits that it is in terms ofthe provisions of the said Police Act, deployment of additional police force is made. He alsosubmits that application has to be considered by the Government and usually the Governmentpasses a resolution permitting the deployment of forces. The ld. Consultant further submits thatthe cost for such provision of services paid by the recipients, gets credited to the Consolidatedfund of the State and does not go into the kitty of the Bombay Police. Similarly, the expenditurefor deployment of forces has to be met from the budget allotted to the Mumbai Police. Thereforethe nature of the activity undertaken by the Bombay Police is of the nature of a sovereignfunction relating to maintenance of law and order and the said service does not fall within thecategory of 'Security Agency Services' as defined in section 65(94) read with section 65(105)(w)of the Finance Act, 1994. Accordingly, he pleads for grant of stay.
 
The ld. Consultant relied on the decisions of this Tribunal in Dy. Comm. Police vs. Commissioner of C.Ex., Jaipur-II [2013-31 STR 228(Tri-Del)], where in identical circumstances, stay has been granted by this Tribunal. He also brought support from the decisions of Bombay High Court in the case of Security Guards Board vs. Comm. Of Central Excise, Thane II [2011(24)STR 391(Bom.)] wherein it was held that a statutory body is not liable to service tax under section 65(94) of the Finance Act, 1994. The ratio of the decisions be applied to the facts of the present case.
 
Respondent’sContention:- The ld. Addl. Commr. (AR) appearing for the Revenue reiterates the findings of Adjudicating authority and submits that in the case of Central Industrial Security Forces (CISF), which also provides security services to various central government establishments including government departments, it has been held that such services would fall within purview of 'Security Agency Service' and CISF has been discharging service tax liability thereon. Ld. Addl. Comm. Also relies on CBEC Circular no. 137/131/2010 dated 2011, wherein it has been, inter alia, clarified that the services provided by the state police in providing 'Escort' service to banks and other establishments could not be said to be statutory and sovereign functions and, therefore, such services are liable to service tax under 'Security Agency Services'.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- The Tribunal has carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides.
 
The Tribunal have read the provisions of the section 47 and 48 of the Mumbai Police Act, 1951. The said provisions, prima facie, suggest that the services provided by deployment of additional police force, either to individuals or for public events, partakes the nature of maintenance of peace and preservation of order. Further, the costs paid by the service recipients gets credited to the consolidated fund of the State, which is also suggestive of statutory/sovereign nature of the function. Further, the issue whether security services provided by the Police is also a security service is a triable issue. Both the Tribunal and the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the cases cited (supra) have taken a prima facie view that such services may not be liable for service tax. Thus, the appellant has made a strong case for grant of stay. Accordingly, we grant unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of the dues adjudged against appellant and stay recovery thereon during the pendency of the appeal. Since, Revenue involved is substantial both side are at liberty to seek early hearing of the appeal.
 
Decision:-Stay granted.
 
Comment:- The analogy of the case is that the services provided by deployment of additional police force, either to individuals or for public events, partakes the nature of maintenance of peace and preservation of order. The costs paid by the service recipients gets credited to the consolidated fund of the State, which is also suggestive of statutory/sovereign nature of the function. Thus, such services provided by the Police are prima facie not leviable to service tax.
 
  
Prepared by: Meet Jain

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com