Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2982

Whether Revenue can be allowed to withhold interest on the ground that appeal has been filed before Supreme Court but no stay has been obtained?

Case:-TAHNEE HEIGHTS CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
 
Citation:- 2015 (40) S.T.R. 453 (Bom.)
 
Brief facts:- The petitioner was a co-operative housing society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Housing Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner had allotted units/flats to their members in a building which was owned by it. The members contributed certain sums and on monthly basis enabling the petitioner to maintain and repair the structures/building. The Commissioner of Service Tax determined that the amounts which were contributed and received by the petitioner were pursuant to the services rendered by it and therefore, Service Tax was liable to be paid.
 
The petitioner did not accept this position, paid the amount under protest, but later on there was adjudication in their favour. The petitioner lodged their refund claims. The petitioner received a show cause notice dated 28-3-2008 as to why this refund claim should not be rejected on the ground that the petitioner had defaulted in payment of Service Tax.
 
The petitioner replied and contested this position by pointing out that no Service Tax was liable to be paid under the category of ‘club’ or ‘association’ services as they were not providing any services. On 10-7-2009 the Order-in-Original was passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai, who rejected this refund claim aggregating to Rs. 93,00,365/- on the ground that the petitioner was liable to pay Service Tax under this category in terms of Section 65(25-a) of the Finance Act and the Service Tax amount was correctly paid by them on monthly charges received by them from their members. Thus, the society’s refund claims were rejected. An appeal against this order was also dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals) by order dated 31-1-2011. Thereafter, the petitioner approached the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal against these orders and that Tribunal had allowed the petitioner’s appeal by order dated 18-12-2014 [2015 (38)S.T.R.407 (Tri.-Mum.)]. Following this success in the Tribunal, the petitioner’s claimed the amounts under the refund claims with interest.
 
From the record it appeared that the petitioner had been paid the principal sum but the claim of interest on the amount which was sought to be refunded had been refused, according to them, not for any other reason but only because of a communication of the department dated 22-6-2015 at Page 31. This communication stated that the matter was still under dispute as the Department had not accepted the CESTAT order and was in the process of filing appeal against the said order. Therefore, the request for payment of interest at this juncture was premature and could not be considered. An affidavit in reply had been filed reiterating this position and rather stating that after having received Rs. 93,00,365/-, the petitioner must wait till the outcome of the proceedings which had been initiated before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
 
Appellant’s contention:- It was contended that the principal amount of Rs. 93,00,365/- had been received and this fact was sufficient to state that the Revenue had accepted the order of the Tribunal. And therefore, interest on the said amount should be paid.
 
 
Respondent’s contention:-Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue, on instructions stated that the appeal against the order of CESTAT had been lodged by the Department/Revenue in the Supreme Court of India and was pending before the registry of that Court. The Department was taking steps to remove all office objections, get that appeal registered and, thereafter, placed before a Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.
 
 
Reasoning of judgement:- After hearing both sides and noting the request of the Revenue, they were mindful of the fact that some compliances and in procedural matters before the Supreme Court of India takes time. However, they did not find any justification and when the impugned order of the CESTAT was passed on 18-12-2014 and the appeal is indeed lodged in the Supreme Court of India, in the Revenue not taking any steps to comply with the procedural requirements. This only meant that the Revenue having complied with the Tribunal’s order and granted refund partially, had withheld the interest claim on a possible realisation that if this is also awarded and paid, the proceedings before the Supreme Court would be rendered infructuous. This could not be the legal position nor can the understanding of the parties be based on the same. The Revenue had ample time to obtain such interim order from the Supreme Court as was permissible in law so that it was relieved from the obligation to pay interest on the Principal sum. However, it had not taken any such steps and there were no interim prohibitory or restraint orders in Revenue’s favor.
In the above circumstances, they could dispose of this Writ Petition with a direction that the Revenue should take requisite steps in the pending proceedings before the Hon’ble Supreme Court within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copies of this order and if within this period it was unable to obtain any interim stay or restraint order in the aforesaid terms, then, it must release the sums outstanding and towards interest within a period of four weeks from the date of expiry of the above period. In other words, on expiry of two months if there was no order in favor of the Revenue of the aforesaid nature, then, the all amounts be refunded and paid to the petitioner within four weeks from the date the time stated above has expired. However, they clarified that their order and direction was without prejudice to the rights and contentions of both sides. Their order and directions did not preclude the Revenue from applying for interim stay or interim relief nor the petitioner had been prevented from arguing to the contrary.
 
Decision:- Petition disposed of.
 
Comment:- Where the order of the Tribunal had been passed in the favor of the assessee and where the Revenue had paid the principal amount, then there was no stand found in Revenue’s contention regarding the revenue not paying the amount of interest on the aforesaid principal amount. The revenue was therefore ordered to avail stay from the Hon’ble Supreme Court as the Revenue had appealed in the said court. It was also ordered that if the Revenue failed to avail such stay from the court within 2 months, then the aforesaid amount of interest would have to be repaid to the petitioner.
 
Prepared By- Sharad Bang
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com