Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law /2016-17/3254

Whether rejection of VCES declaration for arithmetical error proper?

Case:-RENUKA MANGAL SEVA KENDRA VERSUSCOMMISSIONER OF C.E. & CUS., AURANGABAD
 
Citation:- 2016 (43) S.T.R. 135 (Tri. - Mumbai)  
 
Brief Facts:-The brief fact of the case is that the appellant filed VCES declaration on 31-12-2013 wherein the total dues declared was Rs. 2,78,118/-. The appellant as per the provisions paid 50% of the said amount, i.e., Rs. 1,39,100/- on 31-12-2013. The second instalment of 50%, i.e., Rs. 35,288/- and Rs. 1,03,730/- on 13-5-2014 & 30-6-2014 respectively. On finalization of balance sheet, the Chartered Accountant pointed out from the reconciliation of the total gross receipt and it was found that the gross receipt was shown short and accordingly the total dues was declared short by Rs. 35,288/-. The appellant also requantified and paid Rs. 35,288/-. Considering the short-amount declared in the VCES declaration the balance amount along with interest which comes to Rs. 40,479/- was paid on 20-12-2014. With reference to the VCES declaration, the show cause notice was issued to the appellant wherein it was proposed to treat the VCES declaration as substantially false and also proposed to demand Rs. 5,86,789/- without considering the abatement as provided under Notification No. 1/2006-S.T., dated 1-3-2006 to the extent of 40%. In the adjudication, the ld. Commissioner held that due to declaration of short amount dues the declaration is substantially false. He maintaining the payment of Rs. 2,78,118/- confirmed the balance amount of Rs. 3,08,672/- and also demanded interest under Section 75 of the Act and imposed penalty of equal amount under section 78 of the Act. Being aggrieved by the impugned order, the appellant is before Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s Contention:-Shri Dwarkadas S. Ladda, ld. counsel for the appellant submits that they filed VCES declaration for Rs. 2,78,118/- on the basis of gross receipt from the books of account. However, later on reconciliation, it was found that the gross value as well as the tax dues declared by them was short by Rs. 35,288/- due to arithmetical mistake. However, re-quantifying the appellant submitted the correct figure before the department and also paid the total amount of correct dues along with interest total amounting to Rs. 3,18,597/-. He submits that the ld. Commissioner has not given any finding on the issue of abatement and decided the entire case on the basis that the declaration made by the appellant is substantially false. He submits that the gross amount receipt is inclusive of food/catering therefore, they are legally entitled for the abatement of 40% as provided under Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. As regard the allegation of false declaration, he submits that the mistake has occurred only due to arithmetical error, which they have corrected without pointing out by the department. We have paid the entire amount of dues before the due date and in case of short-payment in the first installment of 50%, they also paid interest as provided under the scheme.
 
Respondent Contention:-Shri A.B. Kulgud, ld. Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the findings of the impugned order. He further submits that it is admitted fact that in the VCES declaration filed by the appellant, the total dues was wrongly declared which amounts to a false declaration under the VCES Scheme. It is a foremost condition that true and correct declaration has to be made and for any reason the declaration is found to be wrong, the same will amount to false declaration and for this reason itself the declaration is liable to be rejected.
 
 
Reasoning of Judgment:-On perusal of records it is found that firstly the ld. Commissioner has not given proper finding as regard the abatement available to the appellant to the extent of 40% from the gross value as provided under Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. On perusal of the books of account of the appellant, it was found that the gross receipt shown in the balance sheet/profit and loss account is inclusive of catering/food. As per the Notification No. 1/2006-S.T. the abatement of 40% is allowed subject to condition that the gross amount charge is inclusive of food items. In view of the fact that the cost of the food item is inclusive in the gross amount charged by the appellant, they are entitled for the abatement. As regard, the charge of false declaration, Tribunal found that the mistake has occurred due to arithmetic error in quantifying the due and the same was pointed by the appellant themselves and made good by making the payment of correct amount, and for the delay in making the payment, they also paid the interest. From this fact, Tribunal do not find any intention of the appellant to make a false declaration. This is only due to arithmetical error that there is mistake in declaring the actual dues. Tribunal also find that the appellant have paid the entire amount of correct dues along with interest before the last date, i.e., before 31-12-2014. Therefore, Tribunal do not find any reason why the VCES declaration should not be accepted. In view of above discussion, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal of the appellant is allowed.
 
Decision:-Appeal allowed.
 
Comment:-The crux of the case is thatthe VCES declaration cannot be rejected merely for arithmetical error in declaring the tax liability. When the assessee voluntarily pointed out the short tax liability and paid the same with interest before the last date of paying second instalment, there cannot be any malafide intention on assessee’s part. Hence, it was concluded that VCES declaration filed by appellant should be accepted. However, there are contrary decisions of various High Courts wherein it has been held that benefit of a amnesty scheme cannot be extended if the conditions of the scheme are not complied with.
 
Prepared by:- Bharat Chouhan

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com