Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Tax rates lowered on consumer goods,only luxury goods taxed @ 28% *   Businesses can revise GST transition claim form now *  Multiplex owners in UP demand clarity on refund as tax exemptions go away after GST *   GST compliance: A case of much ado about nothing *  PM hints more relief for traders & businesses to ease GST compliance burden *  Infosys deploys more people in states to ease GSTN load *   Further reforms are needed for the GST to succeed *   GST impact! Massive stock clearance discounts on apparels, gadgets likely in December *  Kerala HC releases Detained Goods since State has No Power to make Rules to regulate Inter-State movement of Goods under GST *  Infosys is to blame for GST Network glitches, say government officials *   Publishers versus authors: Who will pay GST on royalty? *   कपड़ा निर्यातकों ने कहा, जीएसटी के कारण भारत से शिपमेंट में आ सकती है भारी कमी *   Tax professionals protest over GST returns filing in Gujarat *  Publishers versus authors: Who will pay GST on royalty? *   Pilot Implementation of Paperless Processing under SWIFT *   Anti-dumping duty levied on the imports of " Color Coated/ Pre-Painted flat products of alloy or non-alloy steel " s *   Anti-dumping duty levied on the imports of "Wire Rod of Alloy or Non- Alloy Steel "   *   Exemption on goods imported by EOUs from integrated tax and compensation cess   *   Fixation of Tariff Value of Edible Oils, Brass Scrap, Poppy Seeds, Areca Nut, Gold and Sliver  *   Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI  *   Amendment in various Customs exemption notifications to exempt Integrated Tax/Cess on import of goods under AA/EPCG schemes  *   BCD and IGST rates on certain goods prescribed   *   Amendment in rates of supply of services  *   Integrated Tax rate on the leasing of motor vehicles prescribed.  *   RCM to apply on supply of Used vehicles, seized and confiscated goods, old and used goods, waste and scrap  *   Amendment in notification no. 8/2017-IT dated 14.09.2017 so as to add certain items to the list of “handicrafts goods”  *   Exemption to few goods from GST  *   Amendment in rates of goods *   Applicability of RCM on Supply of services by the members of Overseeing Committee to Reserve Bank of India  *   RCM on supplies from unregistered dealers postponed till 31.03.2018 
Subject News *  Refund of unutilized input tax credit of GST paid on inputs in respect of exporters of fabrics vide cicular no 18/2017 GST dt 16.11.17 *   CBEC prescribes procedure for manual filing and processing of refund claims for zero rated supplies *  Suppliers of services through an e-commerce platform are exempted from obtaining compulsory registration *  All taxpayers  exempt from payment of tax on advances received in case of supply of goods *  Changes in Tax rate of permanent transfer of Intellectual Property *  GST on Services by way of admission to protected monuments shall be exempted. *  Relevant Notification to be issued shortly, so as to be made available from 15th of November'17 *  Late fee payable for those where a tax liability arises will be Rs. 50/- per day. *  Supply of services by Composition taxpayer upto Rs 5 lakh per annum will be allowed *  Restaurants in hotel premises having room tariff of less than Rs 7500 per unit per day will attract GST of 5% without ITC. *  Restaurants in hotel premises having room tariff of Rs 7500 and above per day (even for a single room) will attract GST of 18% with full ITC. *  Job work services in relation to manufacture of those handicraft goods in respect of which the casual taxable person has been exempted from registration, shall be reduced to 5% with full ITC. *  All restaurants to levy 5% GST except 5-star ones. *  Tax rate on Bangles made out of lac/shellac has been reduced from 3% to Nil. *  GST rate on Fly Ash bricks has been reduced from 12% to 5%. *  GST rate has been reduced from 18% to 12% for Furniture wholly made of bamboo or cane. *  Tax Rate on Goods of Granites and marbles have been reduced from 28% to 18%. *  Gst rate on Guar meal has been reduced from 5% to nil. *  All stand-alone restaurants irrespective of air conditioned or otherwise, will attract 5% GST without ITC. *  Uniform rate of tax @ 1% under composition scheme for manufacturers and traders. *  Services provided through E-commerce platform shall be exempt from obtaining compulsory registration. *  Due date of TRAN-1 extended till 31.12.2017 along with one time option of revision. *  Due date of GSTR-4 for the quarter July-Sept,2017 revised to 24.12.2017. *  Due date of ITC-04 for the quarter July-Sept,2017 revised to 31.12.2017. *  A facility for manual filing of application for advance ruling shall be introduced. *  Late fee payable where tax liability for that month is ‘NIL’will be Rs. 20/- per day *  Late Fee of GSTR-3B will be re-credited to Electronic Cash Ledger under “Tax” head instead of “Fee” head. *  The time period for filing GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 for the months of July, 2017 to March 2018 would be worked out. *  Extension of due date for filing GSTR-1 till March, 2018 for taxpayers with annual aggregate turnover upto Rs. 1.5 crore. *  Filing of GSTR-3B extended till March,2018 by 20th of the Succeeding month.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-2017/3446

whether refund of Cenvat credit in relation to services received at unregistered premises admissible?

Case-EXL SERVICE.COM INDIA PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS., NOIDA
Citation-2016 (43) S.T.R. 294 (Tri. - All.)
Issue-whether refund of Cenvat credit in relation to services received at unregistered premises admissible?
Brief Facts-The brief facts of the case were that the appellant was an exporter of service having Central Excise Registration dated 21-8-2006 and registered as an 100% EOU with the office of Development Commissioner, NSEZ, Noida and was engaged in providing business of the service for the client located outside India. For the period January to March, 2007 the appellant preferred refund claim of input credit availed which could not be utilized due to the export nature of the output services amounting to Rs. 81,21,592/-. Vide order dated 13-6-2008 part of the refund claim was allowed amounting to Rs. 45,58,308/- and the balance was rejected. Being aggrieved, the appellant preferred appeal before ld. Commissioner (Appeals) who allowed the appeal in part upholding the disallowance with respect to input services received at unregistered premises at the relevant time amounting to Rs. 2,05,860/-, with respect to services received from travel agent Rs. 30,598/-, with respect to guest house expenses Rs. 27,265/-, for invoices not produced Rs. 15,839, for service received from vendor not registered under proper category Rs. 7,344/- and Rs. 3060/- as the name of the appellant assessee was not mentioned on the invoice
Appellant’s Contention.-the appellant assessee was in appeal with respect to the dis­allowance upheld. As regards, the disallowance of Rs. 2,05,860/- the premises being unregistered, the ld. Counsel explained that the premises in Sector 62, Noida had been subsequently taken after the centralised registration in the year 2006. Further, application for addition of the said promises was made on 7-6-2007 and the same have been approved by Revenue on 1-8-2007. That in view of the fact that the appellant assessee was registered with the Central Excise and Service Tax Department and the premises in question have been subsequently approved and added in the registration certificate, the disallowance is bad. The ld. Counsel further relied on the ruling of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of mPortal India Wireless Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. C.S.T., Bangalore : 2012 (27)S.T.R.134 (Kar.) wherein the Hon’ble High Court had held that in case of export of service for seeking refund of Cenvat credit the status of being registered was not required.So far the next ground was concerned with respect to services of travel agent or travel helpdesk amounting to be Rs. 30,598/- was concerned, it was urged that the ld. Commissioner erred in upholding the disallowance by observing that as the appellant is an exporter of service, they can have no business of travelling within India for business purposes. The said finding this extraneous and no disallowance can be sustained of the same. It was further emphasised that the service is in relation to business travel and hence the services received from the travel agent is fully allowable as input services. So far the services received at guest house relating to service tax of Rs. 27,265/- was concerned, it was stated that the guest house was used for business purposes. The travelling executives from other branch offices stay at the guest house for business purposes and as such guest house has indirect nexus with the business of the assessee. Input services received are allowable having direct or indirect nexus with the business of the assessee and as such prays for allowing the same. So far the amount of Rs. 15,839/- was concerned for invoices not produced, the appellant had produced before this Tribunal two invoices, one of Rs. 7,500/- being service tax paid for Internet service and the other invoice had been produced with regard to professional service received for Rs. 689/- totalling Rs. 8,189/-. The ld. Counsel prays that the claim be allowed to the extent invoices are available, not produced earlier. As regards amount of Rs. 7044/- disallowed for the reason that the vendor is not listed in proper category the ld. Counsel draws my attention to the copy of invoice annexed at Page 292 of the appeal book wherein the invoice having been raised by Micro Corporation on the assessee towards software charges Rs. 60,000/- for providing 3 months of support and service tax was Rs. 7344/- have been charged therein. The ld. Counsel stated that there was no dispute with regard to the nature of service and/or receipt of the service or its nexus with the appellant’s business. Only for the reason that the provider of service was registered in different categories or classification of service cannot be the ground for rejection and as such the same was fully allowable. The last disallowance was regarding to invoices raised by manpower recruitment agencies wherein the name of the appellant was not mentioned on the invoice. The ld. Counsel for the applicant had produced the invoices at Pages 293 to 296 of the appeal book. Out of the 4 invoices, 3 invoices were raised in the name of one Mr. Jagat Sabharwal. The invoices were received in the receipt Department of the appellant assessee. The ld. Counsel urged that the appellant had received services and have paid the amount for the service along with service tax and as such the same should be allowed.
Respondent’s Contention-The ld. AR for Revenue relied on various co-ordinate Bench rulings of this Tribunal in the case of Market Creators Ltd. v. CCE : 2014 TIOL 2021 CESTAT-AHM = 2014 (36)S.T.R.386 (Tri.) wherein the fact was that the assessee was registered for providing stock/broker services from the premises at Creative Castle, Vadodara. The assessee had taken Cenvat credit of service tax paid on hiring charges of premises taken by them on rent at 4th Floor, Darpan Apartment, R.C. Dutt Road, Vadodara used by them as Document Retention Centre for storage of number of documents pertaining to the Stock Broker Business. This hired premise was neither registered with the services Department nor used to render any output service directly. The rent receipt did not bear address of the hired premises. The assessee had also availed Cenvat credit on input services used at other unregistered premises located at Junagarh, Jamnagar and Vadodara, from where no output service was provided. This Tribunal, under such circumstances, held that the unregistered premises ought to be registered as ISD (input service distributor) in terms of the Service Tax (Registration of Special Category of Persons) Rules, 2005 read with Rule 7 of CCR and as such appellant cannot take credit on the basis of documents issued by non-registered premises as per ISD under the service tax provisions. The ld. AR also relies on the ruling in the case of Hindustan Zinc Ltd. v. CCE - 2007 TIOL 2214 CESTAT-Delhi = 2007 (214)E.L.T.51 (Tri.), by another co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal wherein under the fact that the assessee was engaged in the manufacture of lead and zinc concentrates and they had availed Cenvat credit on the basis of invoices issued by CEAT Ltd. to the depot which was duly endorsed in favour of the assessee, the adjudicating authority disallowed the credit and imposed penalty. This Tribunal observed that there was no dispute that the invoice was not issued in the name of the assessee. They did not find force in the submission of the assessee that [there] was no requirement to mention the recipient name in the duty paying document and in absence of document as prescribed under Rule 7(l)(a) of the CCR the disallowance of credit was upheld.
 
Reasoning Of Judgement-Having considered the rival contentions, tribunal held that so far the amount of Rs. 2,05,860/- was concerned, the same was allowable in view of the fact that the premises in question have been subsequently recognised and added in the centralized registration certificate. Moreover, registration was not a pre-condition for refund of Cenvat credit in case of an exporter of service was held by Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of mPortal India Wireless Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (supra). So far the travel agent service was concerned, tribunal held  that the same have been wrongly disallowed by the learned Commissioner and tribunal held the same as allowable. So far the service received at guest house is concerned for Rs. 27,265/- tribunal held the same was allowable as the guest house was used for business purposes and have got indirect nexus with the business of the appellant. So far invoice, not produced, was concerned, tribunal allowed the Cenvat credit to the extent of Rs. 8,189/- being the amount of the invoices produced now before this Tribunal during the course of hearing. So far the disallowance of Rs. 7,344/- was concerned on the ground that the provider of service was not registered under proper category, tribunal hold that the disallowance was bad in law, the same is held allowable. So far the invoices for Rs. 3060/- with respect to manpower recruitment service was concerned, tribunal remand the issue to the adjudicating authority with a direction to examine the supporting evidences which may be available in the nature of appointment letter to the concerned persons, who had been named in the invoice of the service provider. If the person shown in the invoices, which has been selected by the recruiting agent and offered to the appellant for employment, and supporting evidences, were produced by the appellant as to providing employment to such persons, payment of salary et cetera, the said amount will be allowable subject to the said verification by the adjudicating authority. Thus, the appeal was allowed in part as indicated above and remanded for verification of the amount of Rs. 3060/- towards manpower recruitment service. The appellant was also directed to appear before the concerned authority with a copy of this order and produce supporting documents with regard to the receipt of manpower recruitment service by them.
Decision-Appeal partly allowed
Comment-the core of this case was that, the disallowance  of refund on ground that the premises was unregistered, was bad in law as registration was nowhere a pre-requirement for refund or credit. The tribunal relied on the ruling of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of mPortal India Wireless Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. C.S.T., Bangalore : 2012 (27)S.T.R.134 (Kar.) wherein the Hon’ble High Court had held that in case of export of service for seeking refund of Cenvat credit the status of being registered was not required. Therefore it was safe to conclude that refund is admissible even if the premises where services are received is unregistered.
Prepared By- ARUNDHATI BAJPAI

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com