Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law /2016-17/3321

Whether refund be allowed if service tax was paid for the period prior to date when the service became taxable?

Case:- G.B. ENGINEERS VERSUS  UNION OF INDIA

Citation:- 2016 (43) S.T.R. 345 (Jhar.)

Brief Facts:-This writ petition has been preferred for getting back the amount of Rs. 2,52,762/- (Rupees two lakhs fifty two thousand seven hundred and sixty-two only), which was deposited by this petitioner despite there is no liability to make payment of any type of tax under any law much less as a service tax. Thus, the aforesaid amount was paid by mistake. Hence, it ought to have been given back to the petitioner.

Appellants Contention:-Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is providing services mainly viz. “Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services”. This is added in the Finance Act, 1994, with effect from 16-6-2005. Thus, for the aforesaid services, the Service Provider has to pay the service tax after 16-6-2005 and not for the period prior to that. A show cause notice was issued by the respondents on 20-11-2009 that petitioner has to deposit service tax for the years 2004-05 and 2005-06, but, this show cause notice has never been decided at all or adjudicated upon because for the period prior to 16-6-2005, the service tax was not leviable at all. Nonetheless, the aforesaid amount was deposited by this petitioner with the respondents under the mistake of fact and law both and hence, this petitioner is seeking return of his money.

Respondents Contention:-Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has submitted that under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to be read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, now refund claim is time-barred and hence, this petitioner is not entitled to refund and the petitioner has not paid the tax under the protest.

Reasoning Of Judgement:-  Having heard learned counsels for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that the petitioner is providing erection, commissioning and installation services. This service is included in the Finance Act for the payment of service tax with effect from 16-6-2005.
Thus, it appears that for the period prior to 16-6-2005, there was no liability for payment of service tax by those who are service provider for the aforesaid services.
It further appears from the facts of this case that show cause notice was given by the respondents on 20-11-2009 for the payment of service tax for the year 2004-05 and for the year 2005-06. This amount was never recovered by this petitioner from the persons to whom the services were provided by this petitioner in the relevant years.
 Looking to the Paragraph No. 6 of the affidavit filed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise & Service Tax, Jharkhand, which reads as under :-
That in reply to Para 11 of the writ application it is “6. stated and submitted that since the petitioner is well aware of the facts that prior to 16-6-2005 the service pertaining to electrical installation was not in the ambit of service tax, therefore, they should not pay service tax voluntarily. But in the instant case the petitioner did not pay the service tax under protest. Therefore, the clause of limitation period is applicable in this case”.
(Emphasis supplied)                        
In view of the aforesaid submissions of the respondent, there was no tax liability at all because, the tax liability starts from 16-6-2005 and therefore, the amount deposited by this petitioner which is at Rs. 2,52,762/-, ought to be refunded by the respondents.
Section 11B of the Central Excise Act to be read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 are not applicable to the facts of the present case because, the amount paid by the petitioner is never under the Central Excise Tax nor under the service tax when there is no liability to make the payment of the amount and under the mistake of facts or under mistake of law or under both if any amount is deposited by the assessee, the same cannot be retained by the Union of India under the one or other pretext when a service provider is not liable to make payment of the service tax and if any payment is made, it cannot be covered under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act to be read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994.
In view of the aforesaid facts and reasons, the order dated 28-2-2013 which is at Annexure-4, is hereby, quashed and set aside and the amount at Rs. 2,52,762/- will be refunded to the petitioner or will be adjusted against the other future liability of this petitioner to cover the service tax.
This writ petition is allowed and disposed of. 

Decision:- Petition allowed

Comment:-The essence of the case is that erection, commissioning and installation services provided by the appellant were made taxable only w.e.f. 16-6-2005 and the assessee paid service tax for period prior to this date under mistaken belief of fact or law or both. For refund of such erroneous levy, statutory provisions prescribing limitation are not applicable and refund is allowed by the High Court.

Prepared By:- Praniti Lalwani
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com