Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2013-14/1966

Whether principles of unjust enrichment apply for refund of credit taken on inputs used in the manufacture of export goods?
Case:- SAI CREATION Vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI-III
 

Citation:-2013 (294) E.L.T. 637 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief facts:-The facts of the case were that the applicant M/s. Sai Creation filed a refund claim of Rs. 2,23,254/- being unutilized credit balance in their CENVAT account attributable to inputs used in the manufacture of goods which were cleared for export. The claim for refund was rejected and the matter was considered by this Tribunal and this Tribunal vide Order No. A/560-562/2010/SMB/C-IV, dated 16-9-2010 allowed the refund. Pursuant to the said order, the jurisdictional Asst. Commissioner vide order dated 12-10-2011 allowed the refund to the appellant. The revenue preferred an appeal against the said order before the Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that while sanctioning the refund, the jurisdictional Asst. Commissioner did not examine the aspect of unjust enrichment. The lower appellate authority considered the matter and allowed the appeal filed by the revenue on the ground that in terms of the Hon’ble Apex Court’s decision in Mafatlal Inds. Ltd.[1997 (89)E.L.T.247 (S.C.)] and Sahakari Khand Udyog and Others [2005 (181)E.L.T.328 (S.C.)] cases all types of refund claim had to pass the proof of not passing on the incidence of duty (unjust enrichment) and in the instant case the appellant had not led any evidence to show that they had not passed on the incidence of tax.

Appellant’s contentions:-None appeared for the appellant. However, on going through the appeal memo wherein the appellant had contended that in terms of clause (c) of the proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, the provisions of unjust enrichment would not apply if the refund relates to credit of duty paid on excisable goods used as inputs for manufacture of export goods in accordance with rules made or any Notification issued under the Act. In the instant case, the goods had been exported and the appellant had the balance of credit lying in his account in respect of the duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of export goods, and that was the reason why the appellant preferred a claim under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant had also relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Indo-Nippon Chemicals Co. Ltd. - 2005 (185)E.L.T.19 and the judgment of Opel Alloys P. Ltd. - 2010 (249)E.L.T.408wherein it was held that in respect of cases covered by clause (c) of first proviso to Section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the principles of unjust enrichment were not attracted or applicable.
 
Respondent’s contentions:-Ld. AR representing the revenue reiterated the findings of the lower appellate authority by holding that claim for refund should be rejected as the principle of unjust enrichment was attracted to the case concerned.

Reasoning of judgment:-Tribunal had considered the rival submissions carefully. As the issue lies in a narrow compass, the appeal itself was taken up for disposal after dispensing with the requirement of pre-deposit.

The provisions of unjust enrichment did not apply if the refund pertained to credit of duty on excisable goods used as inputs in the manufacture of goods which were exported. In the instant case there was no dispute on this point. Therefore, the lower appellate authority was completely wrong when it said the provisions of unjust enrichment were attracted. Reliance placed on Mafatlal Inds. case by the lower appellate authority was also incorrect inasmuch as the said decision pertains to a situation where the provisions of unjust enrichment would apply. When Section 11B providing for grant of refund of excise duty specifically provides that in certain specified situations, the provisions of unjust enrichment shall not apply, the law had to be interpreted and enforced accordingly.
On an identical issue, the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Indo Nippon cited supra held that the provisions of unjust enrichment will not apply in respect of CENVAT credit taken on inputs used in export goods and the said decision was upheld by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Asst. Comm. v. Indo Nippon - 2005 (186) E.L.T. A117 (S.C.). Again this Tribunal in the case of Opel Alloys (supra), following the Apex Court judgment, held that in view of clause (c) of first proviso to Section 11B(2) of Central Excise Act, 1944, principles of unjust enrichment shall not apply, in the case of CENVAT credit taken on inputs used in the manufacture of export goods. The ratio of these decisions applies squarely to the facts of this present case.
 
Accordingly, the impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Stay application was also disposed off.

Decision:-Appeal allowed.

Comment:-The analogy drawn from the case is  that when Section 11B providing for grant of refund of excise duty specifically provides that in certain specified situations, the provisions of unjust enrichment shall not apply then the same is to be strictly followed and executed. Accordingly, the principles of unjust enrichment shall not apply in the case of CENVAT credit taken on inputs used in the manufacture of export goods.

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com