Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case law/2014-15/2231

Whether penalty under Section 114 can be imposed if drawback is wrongly availed?

Case:- MAHARASHTRA SOLVENT EXTRACTION PVT LTD SANJAY AGARWAL Vs CC (EXPORT), NHAVA SHEVA
 
Citation:- 2014-TIOL-926-CESTAT-MUM
 
Brief facts:- The appellants were in appeals against the impugned order wherein the penalties on the main appellant had been imposed under Section 114A and on the Director under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Brief facts of the case were that the main appellant was manufacturer of De-Oiled Cake and an exporter. To manufacture the said De-oiled Cake, they procured Hexane gas without payment of duty. After exportation of the goods, they claimed duty draw back available on the export goods. The claim was sanctioned. Later-on, it was revealed that the appellants had procured the Hexane gas without payment of duty and also availed draw back claim which was not admissible. Impugned proceedings were initiated and a show-cause notice was issued alleging that the appellants had wrongly and irregularly availed duty draw back therefore, they were liable to be penalized under Section 114A and 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962. Both the lower authorities confirmed the penalties on the appellants. Aggrieved by the said the appellants were before me.
 
Appellant’s contentions:- The learned Counsel for the appellants submitted that in this case the appellants were manufacturer of De-oiled cake which sometimes were cleared in DTA as well as exported. They had wrongly claimed the draw back on the export goods where they had not paid duty on Hexane gas. For that reason it could not be held that they had taken draw back claim with an intention to take double benefit. As the appellants had already paid the duty draw back claim along with interest before the issuance of the show-cause notice therefore, penalty was not imposable on them. As show-cause notice itself alleges that they had claimed draw back wrongly. He further submitted that the penalty on the appellant was not imposable under Section 114A as there was no demand of duty. In support of his contention he placed reliance on the decision in the case of Chowhan Exports Ltd. vs. CC - 2000 (121) ELT 833 (Tri.).
He further submitted that the penalty imposed under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 was also not imposable on the Director of the Company as there was no proposal in the show-cause notice for confiscation of the impugned goods. As per the provision of Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962, penalty could be imposed if the goods were held liable for confiscation. In the circumstance, the impugned order quo imposing penalties on both the appellants were to be set aside.
 
Respondent’s contentions:- On the other hand, the learned A.R. appearing for the Revenue supported the impugned order and submitted that the penalties had been rightly imposed on the appellants for their act for availing draw back which they were not entitled to. It was further submitted that the act of appellants of the mis-declaration of fact to avail the drawback and without bringing the same to the notice of the department, proves suppression of facts. Therefore, the impugned order was to be upheld.

Reasoning of judgment:-On perusal of the show-cause notice, Hon’ble judge found that the allegation against the appellants was that they had wrongly availed draw back claim. If an assessee took draw back claim wrongly, in that situation, it cannot be said that the assessee was having an intention to suppress the facts. Therefore, the facts of suppression were not proved as the show-cause notice itself alleges that draw back had been taken wrongly. Hon’ble judge found force in the argument advanced by the learned Advocate that as per the Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, penalty can be imposed on account of non-payment, short payment or erroneously refunded duty but in this case duty was not demanded. The only allegation against the appellants was that they had availed draw back claim wrongly. Therefore, relying on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Chowhan Exports Ltd. (supra), penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, was not imposable on the main appellant.
Further he found that in the show-cause notice there was no proposal for confiscation of the impugned goods. Therefore, penalty under Section 114(iii) was not imposable.
With these observations, he held that the penalties on both the appellants were not imposable. Accordingly, penalties imposed on the both the appellants were set aside. The impugned order was modified to this extent. With these terms, the appeals were allowed.
 
Decision:-Appeals allowed.
 
Comment:- The analogy drawn from the case is that as per the Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962, penalty can be imposed on account of non-payment, short payment or erroneously refunded duty but not in the case where duty was not demanded. Therefore, relying on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Chowhan Exports Ltd. (supra), penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, was not imposable on the assessee. Also, if there isn’t any proposal for confiscation of the impugned goods then penalty under Section 114(iii) was also not tenable.
 
Prepared By:Ranu Dhoot

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com