Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case law/2014-15/2208

Whether penalty leviable for incorrect utilization of excess credit balance?

Case:- CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPN. Vs COMMR. OF SERVICE TAX, AHMEDABAD

Citation:- 2013 (30) S.T.R. 556 (Tri. - Ahmd.)

Brief facts:- The facts of the case, in brief, were that the appellant was engaged in providing taxable services under the category of ‘Storage and Ware Housing Service’, Cargo Handling Service, Transport of Goods by road and Clearing Services. During the course of audit, it was found that they had availed excess cenvat credit of Rs. 4140/- wrongly on the invoices issued by the service provider of Rent-a-Cab Service by correcting the original amount of the invoices at the time of payment when rate difference was raised. It was noticed that the amount mentioned in the invoices have been corrected by the appellant himself to arrive at the new rate at the time of payment. The invoices issued by the service provider can be corrected only by the service provider and not by the appellant. The credit of service tax amount can be availed only on the basis of taxable value as mentioned in the invoices and not on the basis of corrected amount. On pointing out the same, the appellant had not agreed with the objection and stated that the Service Tax amount availed by them was correct since they have made the payment to the service provider. Also the appellant had not followed the provisions of Rule 6(3)(c) and utilised excess credit thereby wrongly utilised credit equivalent to Rs. 4,77,346/-. Accordingly, show cause notice dated 27-1-2010 was issued, matter was adjudicated and cenvat credit of Rs. 4,81,486/- was disallowed under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and imposed penalty under Sections 75, 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Aggrieved by such an order the appellant preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority and the first appellate authority, after considering the submissions made, had reduced the demand of service tax liability to Rs. 92,362/-, along with interest and also imposed equivalent amount of penalty under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. Hence the appellant was before Tribunal.
 
Appellant’s contention:- Learned Chartered Accountant on behalf of the appellant submitted that the demand had been raised only on the ground that the appellant had availed excess Cenvat credit than the amount which they could have utilised in the month of August and December 2007. It was his submission that the said utilisation was reflected in the returns which they filed with the authorities and subsequently, the same was made good in the next month. It was his submission that there was no intention to evade the service tax liability. He submitted that in this case the issue was barred by limitation as the show cause notice had been issued on 27-1-2010.

The learned Chartered Accountant submitted that the both the lower authorities had not appropriated the amount already reversed by them in their records and it was informed to them vide ST-3 returns. Since the appellant had already reversed the same in their records, the order-in-original confirming the demand was appropriated against the amount already paid by them. As regards the interest amount, it was his submission that the same may be calculated by the revenue and on being informed to the appellant, they will discharge the same in due course.
 
Respondent’s contentions:- Learned departmental representative reiterated the findings of the lower authorities.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- After careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides and perusal of the record, the Hon’ble judge found that the issue was in narrow compass as to whether the appellant was required to be saddled with the equivalent amount of penalty under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, for incorrectly utilising the excess amount of Cenvat credit for discharge of service tax liability. On perusal of the record, he found that there was enough balance available with the appellant and the excess utilisation seemed to be an inadvertent error. This inadvertent error had been made good by the appellant on their own by adjusting and debiting the amount in the Cenvat credit available with them. Subsequent scrutiny had resulted in issuance of show cause notice to the appellant and the show cause notice had been issued after three years. Since the credit was available with the appellant and the excess amount inadvertently utilised was debited in the very next month, though it happened twice, he found that there was no intention to evade the service tax liability as the appellant had been regularly filing returns with the lower authorities. He found that, this was fit case, for invoking the provisions of Section 80 and set-aside the penalty imposed by the lower authorities under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, on the ground that the appellant being a PSU, and also having paid the amount on their own on being noticed.

In view of the foregoing, in the facts and circumstances of this case, Hon’ble judge set-aside the penalties imposed under Sections 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 by invoking the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.
 
Decision:- Appeal was allowed.
 
Comment:- The analogy drawn from the case is that if there is enough Cenvat balance available with the assessee and the excess utilization seems to be an inadvertent error, and this error has been made good by the assessee on their own by adjusting and debiting the amount in the Cenvat credit available with them, and also the assessee is regularly filing returns, then there lies no intention to evade tax. Hence the assessee cannot be penalized by extending the benefit of provision of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.

Prepared by: Ranu Dhoot

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com