Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/3005

Whether order of adjudicating authority is sustainable when passed without considering the decision of cited by assessee?

Case:MUTHOOT FINANCE LTD. VersusUNION OF INDIA

Citation:2015 (40) S.T.R. 26 (Ker.)             

Brief Facts: The writ petition is filed by the appellant against Ext. P6 order of the 2nd respondent whereby the 2nd respondent has confirmed a demand of service tax and penalty on the petitioner. The issue involved, with regard to the liability to service tax of the petitioner, who was an agent of M/s. Paul Merchant Limited, and engaged in the provision of services of money transfer on behalf of Western Union, a Company having its operations outside the territory of India. The issue had already been decided in favour of an assessee, similarly situated as the petitioner, by a three member Bench of the CESTAT in the decision reported in Paul Merchants Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.EX., Chandigarh [2013 (29)S.T.R.257 (Tri.-Del.)],

Appellant’s Contention:- Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the 2nd respondent, other than referring to the decision of the appellate Tribunal in M/s. Paul Merchant's case, does not expressly state how, the facts of the petitioner's case are different from those that obtained in the case of M/s. Paul Merchant Limited that was decided by the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal. They submitted that the 2nd respondent was bound by the decision of the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, it was not open to the 2nd respondent to confirm the demand against the petitioner by overlooking the decision of the Appellate Tribunal. The 2nd respondent was governed by the principles of judicial discipline, and was bound to follow the order of the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, unless the 2nd respondent found the facts of the petitioner's case distinguishable from the facts of the case decided by the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal.
It was not open to the 2nd respondent Commissioner to ignore the said binding decision of the Tribunal and confirm the demand of service tax on the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner would, in particular, point to paragraph 28, 29 and 30 of Ext. P6 order of the 2nd respondent to contend that the 2nd respondent, other than referring to the decision of the appellate Tribunal in M/s. Paul Merchant's case, does not expressly state how, the facts of the petitioner's case are different from those that obtained in the case of M/s. Paul Merchant Limited that was decided by the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal. It is his specific contention, that inasmuch as the 2nd respondent was bound by the decision of the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, it was not open to the 2nd respondent to confirm the demand against the petitioner by overlooking the decision of the Appellate Tribunal. In short, the contention of the petitioner is that, the 2nd respondent was governed by the principles of judicial discipline, and was bound to follow the order of the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, unless the 2nd respondent found the facts of the petitioner's case distinguishable from the facts of the case decided by the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal.

Respondent’s Contention:Learned Standing counsel appeared for the respondents.

Reasoning of Judgement: High Court accepted the contention of the petitioner, that the 2nd respondent in Ext. P6 order, has not highlighted any point of distinction between the facts of the petitioners case, and the facts that were considered by the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, while deciding the issue in favour of the assessee in the decision reported in Paul Merchants Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex., Chandigarh [2013 (29)S.T.R.257 (Tri.-Del.)].
When an assessee cites a decision of the Larger Bench of the Appellate Tribunal, before the adjudicating authority under the Finance Act, 1994, as amended, it will be incumbent upon the adjudicating authority to follow the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal, unless the factual situation in the case before the adjudicating authority calls for a different interpretation. Inasmuch as in Ext. P6 order, the 2nd respondent has not pointed to any distinguishing feature in the case of the petitioner, as would distinguish it from the case decided by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal, I am of the view that, the 2nd respondent must be directed to reconsider the matter in the light of the observations made in this judgment. Accordingly, The High Court quash Ext. P6 order and direct the 2nd respondent to consider the matter afresh, and pass fresh orders within a period of two months, after hearing the petitioner and taking note of the observations in this judgment.

Decision: The Writ petition is disposed in favour of assessee.

Comment: The case is related to the non-consideration of decision of larger bench cited by the assessee. Assessee filed writ petition against the order of adjudicating authority on the ground that adjudicating authority has passed its order without considering the decision cited by the assessee. The High Court decided the matter in the favour of assessee and held that it will be incumbent upon the adjudicating authority to follow the decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal, unless the factual situation in the case before the adjudicating authority calls for a different interpretation.
 
 
 
 
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com