Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2833

Whether meter reading, preparation of monthly energy bill and its delivery to customers fall under BAS?

Case:-JHARKHAND SOFTWARE & HARDWARE (P) LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., RANCHI
 
Citation:- 2015 (39) S.T.R. 842 (Tri. - Kolkata)

 
Brief facts:- The appellant were rendering various services to M/s. Jharkhand State Electricity Board. The department classified these services under “Business Auxiliary Services”. The appellant filed an application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax of Rs. 7.49 lakhs and equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 78, penalty of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 77 and penalty (not quantified) under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994.
 
Appellant’s contention:- At the outset, the ld. Consultant for the applicant submitted that the applicants were rendering various services to M/s. Jharkhand State Electricity Board. The services rendered by them consisted of meter reading, preparation of monthly energy bill, delivery of the bills to customers, surveillance of meter, processing, preparation and supply of consumer ledger and other statements in the prescribed proforma of the said Electricity Board. It was his submission that they were not rendering services “on behalf” of the client, but “to the client” and hence, the definition of ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ prescribed under Sections 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994, had not been satisfied in the present case, accordingly, no service tax was leviable on the same.
 
Respondent’s contention:-On the other hand, the ld. AR appearing for the Department, submitted that the applicants were providing services to the consumers of the said Electricity Board. Hence, in the present case, the services were provided on behalf of the client, hence, the definition of ‘Business Auxiliary Service’, particularly Clauses (vi) & (vii) were satisfied in the present case.
 
Reasoning of judgement:- Both the sides were heard and records were pursued. Prima facie, it was found that the applicants were providing service to the Jharkhand State Electricity Board, which comprised of meter reading, preparation of monthly energy bill, delivery of the bills to customers, preparation and supply of consumer ledger etc., which, prima facie, fell under the category of “Business Auxiliary Service” as defined under Section 65(19)(vi)(vii) of the Finance Act, 1994. Prima facie, it was found that in the present case, there are three parties involved, namely, (i) the applicant, (ii) Jharkhand State Electricity Board & (iii) the Customer of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board. Thus, these services were rendered on behalf of the Client (Jharkhand State Electricity Board) to the consumer of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board. In these circumstances, the applicant could not able to make out a prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit. No financial hardship was pleaded by the applicant. Accordingly, it was directed to the applicant to deposit 50% of the service tax of Rs. 7.49 lakhs within a period of twelve weeks and report compliance on 9-1-2014. On deposit of the said amount, the balance amount of dues adjudged against the applicant would stand waived and its recovery stayed during pendency of the appeal. Failure to deposit the said amount would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.
 
Decision:- Stay partly granted.
 
Comment:- The substance of the case is that the services provided in relation to meter reading, preparation of monthly energy bill, delivery of the bills to customers, preparation and supply of consumer ledger etc. are to be treated as services provided on behalf of State electricity board and consequently, the said services are prima facie liable to service tax under the category of business auxiliary services.
 
Prepared By:- Sharad Bang
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com