Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2833

Whether meter reading, preparation of monthly energy bill and its delivery to customers fall under BAS?

Case:-JHARKHAND SOFTWARE & HARDWARE (P) LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & S.T., RANCHI
 
Citation:- 2015 (39) S.T.R. 842 (Tri. - Kolkata)

 
Brief facts:- The appellant were rendering various services to M/s. Jharkhand State Electricity Board. The department classified these services under “Business Auxiliary Services”. The appellant filed an application for waiver of pre-deposit of service tax of Rs. 7.49 lakhs and equal amount of penalty imposed under Section 78, penalty of Rs. 5,000/- under Section 77 and penalty (not quantified) under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994.
 
Appellant’s contention:- At the outset, the ld. Consultant for the applicant submitted that the applicants were rendering various services to M/s. Jharkhand State Electricity Board. The services rendered by them consisted of meter reading, preparation of monthly energy bill, delivery of the bills to customers, surveillance of meter, processing, preparation and supply of consumer ledger and other statements in the prescribed proforma of the said Electricity Board. It was his submission that they were not rendering services “on behalf” of the client, but “to the client” and hence, the definition of ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ prescribed under Sections 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994, had not been satisfied in the present case, accordingly, no service tax was leviable on the same.
 
Respondent’s contention:-On the other hand, the ld. AR appearing for the Department, submitted that the applicants were providing services to the consumers of the said Electricity Board. Hence, in the present case, the services were provided on behalf of the client, hence, the definition of ‘Business Auxiliary Service’, particularly Clauses (vi) & (vii) were satisfied in the present case.
 
Reasoning of judgement:- Both the sides were heard and records were pursued. Prima facie, it was found that the applicants were providing service to the Jharkhand State Electricity Board, which comprised of meter reading, preparation of monthly energy bill, delivery of the bills to customers, preparation and supply of consumer ledger etc., which, prima facie, fell under the category of “Business Auxiliary Service” as defined under Section 65(19)(vi)(vii) of the Finance Act, 1994. Prima facie, it was found that in the present case, there are three parties involved, namely, (i) the applicant, (ii) Jharkhand State Electricity Board & (iii) the Customer of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board. Thus, these services were rendered on behalf of the Client (Jharkhand State Electricity Board) to the consumer of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board. In these circumstances, the applicant could not able to make out a prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit. No financial hardship was pleaded by the applicant. Accordingly, it was directed to the applicant to deposit 50% of the service tax of Rs. 7.49 lakhs within a period of twelve weeks and report compliance on 9-1-2014. On deposit of the said amount, the balance amount of dues adjudged against the applicant would stand waived and its recovery stayed during pendency of the appeal. Failure to deposit the said amount would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice.
 
Decision:- Stay partly granted.
 
Comment:- The substance of the case is that the services provided in relation to meter reading, preparation of monthly energy bill, delivery of the bills to customers, preparation and supply of consumer ledger etc. are to be treated as services provided on behalf of State electricity board and consequently, the said services are prima facie liable to service tax under the category of business auxiliary services.
 
Prepared By:- Sharad Bang
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com