Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Missing seized records must be considered while testing ITC claim; duplicate GST demands ordered corrected: Delhi High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be rejected without addressing taxpayer’s grounds: Allahabad High Court. *  Surplus IGST credit can offset CGST, SGST shortfall: GSTAT. *  GST refund can’t be denied when cancelled airfares are returned with tax: GSTAT. *  3 Hearing notices issued within 2 minutes: Gujarat High Court flags portal flaw, seeks report. *  GSTR-9, GSTR-9C filing for FY 2025-26 enabled; pending GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B must be filed first. *  Dupattas are exempt fabrics, can’t be taxed as fibres at 4%: Madras High Court. *  Full transitional credit allowed on capital goods received after GST rollout: GSTAT denies Rs. 6.99 lakh export duty credit. *  GST return mismatch alone can’t justify fraud proceedings: GSTAT orders fresh adjudication under section 73. *  Supplier found non-existent later can’t alone justify input tax credit denial: GSTAT. *  GST interest stops once tax reaches government account, can’t run until return filing: GSTAT. *  Cancelled flat booking- GST refund can’t be denied without excluding COVID period from limitation: GSTAT. *  India notifies rules of origin for India–New Zealand FTA. *  Incomplete E-bike kits classifiable as complete vehicles, but not eligible for CKD duty concession: CESTAT. *  Same GST rate on main input and output can’t by itself bar inverted duty refund: GSTAT. *  Unjust enrichment doesn’t apply to customs refunds from assessments finalised before July 13, 2006: Gujarat High Court. *  CENVAT credit can’t be denied solely because plant And machinery are embedded in earth: Karnataka High Court. *  DFIA exports ineligible for RoDTEP benefits; customs directs repayment with applicable interest. *  Second E-Way bill alone doesn’t prove another supply: GSTAT. *  Bail denied in Rs. 1.19 crore fake GST refund case over risk of accused absconding again: Punjab and Haryana High Court. *  GST registration can be restored after revocation deadline if outstanding dues are paid: Gauhati High Court. *  Multiple GST proceedings over same suppliers: Calcutta High Court directs dept. to share findings for adjudication. *  E-Governance portal services not OIDAR, fixed deposit interest not taxable: CESTAT. *  Rs. 500 Stamp duty required on authority letters for CAs, CMA and GST practitioners in Pune GST division.  *  Rs. 1.10 crore GST refund must be paid in cash after business closure: Allahabad High Court. *  Godown rent attracts 18% GST even when used exclusively for exempt agricultural warehousing: AAR. *  GST portal launches "Multi-State Registration" facility: one master TRN for registration applications across multiple States/UTs. *  RoDTEP scheme extended till 31st December, 2026.  *  Mere disagreement with order can’t override Rs. 20 lakh appeal limit: GSTAT. *  Customs interest can’t be backdated before confiscation liability is determined; nearly 8 year period excluded: Delhi High Court.
Subject News *  GST summons: anticipatory bail maintainable without arrest order, but relief denied in evasion case: Allahabad High Court. *  GST Appeal can’t be decided without hearing taxpayer’s objections to fresh evidence: Allahabad High Court. *  GST ITC can’t be reversed merely because supplier grants discount without reducing tax liability: GSTAT. *  Mere quoting of GST provision is not a valid charge: GSTAT quashes ITC denial. *  Personal hearing mandatory before adverse GST order, even without taxpayer’s request: Rajasthan High Court. *  Parallel bail pleas without full disclosure amount to abuse of process Rs. 43.08 crore GST case sent for fresh hearing: Supreme Court. *  GST refund based on unchallenged advance ruling can’t be recovered using later circular: GSTAT. *  Payment of GST alone doesn’t end interest and penalty liability when tax and interest remain unpaid beyond 30 days of notice: GSTAT. *  GST demand over builders’ 80% procurement rule requires reasoned adjudication: GSTAT. *  Eligible ITC doesn’t automatically entitle taxpayers to compensation cess refund on domestic sales: GSTAT. *  GST confiscation order passed before reply deadline invalid: GSTAT. *  GST interest can’t be retained after tax refund on delayed export receipts: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  GST appeal can’t be dismissed over pre-deposit shortfall without opportunity To respond: Bombay High Court. *  DGGI SCN can’t be challenged before reply and adjudication:Chhattisgarh High Court. *  GST input tax credit can’t be denied solely due to supplier’s retrospective registration cancellation: GSTAT. *  GST notice must explain fraud allegations; merely repeating section 74 Is not enough:  Himachal Pradesh High Court. *  Audit detection alone can’t justify GST fraud penalty; specific suppression must be proved: GSTAT. *  GST order uploaded only under ‘Additional Notices’ tab without separate intimation set aside: Calcutta High Court. *  Service Tax appeal can’t be rejected for missing pre-deposit proof when payment is already recorded: CESTAT. *  SGST dept. can’t hear appeal against CGST order: Calcutta High Court. *  Mere dispatch of tax order can’t prove service or make appeal time-barred: CESTAT. *  Dealer incentives can’t be taxed merely on ledger entries: CESTAT. *  DGFT orders quashed for failure to supply DRI letter relied upon in SCN: Bombay High Court. *  GST penalty u/s 122(1A) can’t apply to Pre-2021 transactions; unregistered beneficiaries also covered: Delhi High Court. *  Expired E-way bill caused by wrong PIN code can’t justify GST penalty without intent to evade tax: GSTAT. *  Used railway rails can’t be taxed as track material without proof they are fit for reuse: CESTAT. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand on different issue: Delhi High Court. *  ITC dispute involves no question of law: GSTAT directs appeal to Vice-President. *  Earlier DGGI notice doesn’t bar separate GST demand On different issue: Delhi High Court. *  No E-way bill required for interstate goods movement in november 2017: GSTAT quashes detention and penalty.  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3568

Whether he is eligible to be in the composition scheme as his aggregate turnover is much less than Rs. 50, 00,000?
M/s Empathic Trading Centre KAR ADRG 28/2020 dated 23/04/2020
Brief Facts:- The Applicant is engaged in the business of supplying goods and is also a supplier of service of renting of immovable property and both the activities of the applicant are taxable. He is currently registered under composition scheme as his turnover is less than Rs.50 Lakhs.
Issue: -1. Whether he is eligible to be in the composition scheme as his aggregate turnover        is much less than Rs. 50, 00,000?
2. Whether the rate of composition tax applicable is 1% for the turnover of goods (sales) and 6% for the turnover of service (rent). The two separate taxes amounts to be totalled and paid or is it 6% as a whole for the aggregate turnover of goods and service turnover that is to be paid?
Applicant Contention: -The contention of the Applicant is that since the turnover is less than Rs.50 lakhs, he is eligible for composition scheme as the scheme is applicable to both sale of goods and service. The applicant further submits that the supply of goods and the supply of service are unrelated and totally unconnected and hence he is liable to pay 1% as composition tax on supply of goods and 6% on the supply of service.
Reasoning of the Judgement: -The Authority states that there is no dispute that both the activities of the applicant are taxable and also supplied by the same person. The authority further discusses the eligibility of composition scheme under section 10.  The applicant admittedly is supplying services and hence the eligibility for composition scheme is dependent on the satisfaction of the condition stipulated in the second proviso to sub-section (1) of section 10. If the turnover of services of the applicant exceeds ten per cent of turnover in a State or Union territory in the preceding financial year or five lakh rupees, whichever is higher, then he shall not be eligible to composition scheme.
Even if the applicant obtains separate registration, one for the goods and other for the services, he would not be eligible for composition for both the lines of business. Hence the applicant is not eligible for composition under section 10 of the CGST Act if the turnover of services of the applicant exceeds Rs.5 Lakhs or ten percent of turnover is the state, whichever is higher.
Coming to the notification no.2/ 2019 - Central Tax (Rate) dated 07.03.2019, the said notification prescribes the rate of tax for the "first supplies of goods or services or both upto an aggregate turnover of fifty lakh rupees made on or after the 1st day of April in any financial year, by a registered person" and is not issued under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017. Hence it is not a composition scheme but is an optional scheme.
The conditions for the scheme are as under:"1. Supplies are made by a registered person, -
(i) whose aggregate turnover in the preceding financial year was fifty lakh rupees or below;
(ii) who is not eligible to pay tax under sub-section (1) of section 10 of the said Act
The authority for advance ruling has held that the applicant shall be eligible to pay tax under the said notification, only if the applicant is not eligible to pay tax under section 10(1) of the CGST Act and since the applicant does not satisfy the above condition as he is registered under Section 10 of CGST Act, 2017 , he could not opt for the prescribed notification 2/2019 CTR although he satisfies the other condition of the turnover limit is less than Rs.50 Lakhs and hence he satisfies this condition and other conditions are not applicable to him. Hence the applicant is not eligible to pay tax under the registered as Composition Taxpayer.
If the applicant opts out of the Composition levy and he obtains separate registrations for the two lines of business, as per second condition, he shall be liable to pay tax at 3% CGST and 3% SGST on the each of the turnovers of the registrations. The tax is on the entire aggregate turnover i.e all the "first supplies of goods or services or both upto an aggregate turnover of Rs.50 Lakhs". Hence the applicant is liable to pay tax under CGST Act at 3% and at 3% under KGST Act, if he opts to pay tax under the said Notification after opting out of Composition levy on the entire value of supplies made and he cannot apply different schemes for different types of transactions.
Held:-
1.The authority for advance ruling held that the applicant is eligible to be in the composition scheme under section 10 of the CGST Act, 2017 if the turnover of services of the applicant does not exceed ten per cent of turnover in a State or Union territory in the preceding financial year or five lakh rupees, whichever is higher.
2. The applicant is not eligible to opt to pay tax under the Notification No.2/2019- Central Tax (Rate) dated 07.03.2019 and under the Notification (02/2019) No. FD 48 CSL 2017 dated 07.03.2019 of the Government of Karnataka as the applicant is registered as a Composition Taxpayer.
3. The rate of tax applicable on the entire value is 3% CGST and 3% KGST and he cannot pay tax at 1% on supply of goods and 6% tax on the supply of services.
Comment: - The notification no. 2/2019 has been issued  as Central Tax (Rate) Notification having reference of section 9(1) pertaining to levy and collection, section 11(1) specifying power to grant exemption from tax and section 16(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 stating eligibility and conditions for taking input tax credit. The main portion of the notification specifying the powers under which the notification has been issued itself indicates that the notification no. 2/2019-Central Tax (Rate) is not composition scheme and rather it is kind of exemption notification.
Prepared by- Kartik Singhvi
 
 
 
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com