Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3557

Whether GST will be applicable on the transfer of title in moulds from applicant to Indian buyer?
Automative Components Technology India Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Order No. 05/ARA/2020 dated 31.01.2020
 
Brief Facts: -The applicant is engaged in the supply of automotive components. They have stated that they agree to supply certain parts, including moulds to Indian Company located in the State of Tamil Nadu, for which they place an order for manufacturing the said parts and moulds on a Thailand Company. The parts manufactured are physically imported, while the moulds developed are retained in Thailand and are not physically imported into India, but the ownership in the mould is transferred from the foreign supplier to the Applicant and from the applicant to the Indian buyer by raising of separate invoices. Thus, with regard to the moulds, there are two transactions involved inthe present case:
 
T1: Transfer of title in moulds from the foreign supplier to the Applicant.
 
T2: Transfer of title in moulds from the Applicant to the Indian buyer.
 
They have also stated that the moulds are never physically imported into India. Themoulds will be disposed as waste in Thailand after its usage for manufacturing the requisite parts.
 
Issue:-
  • Whether GST will be applicable on the transfer of title in moulds from applicant to Indian buyer?
  • If yes, whether the Indian buyer would be eligible to take credit of the GST paid to the applicant for said purchase?
 
 Appellant’s Contention:- The applicant on his interpretation of law has stated that on application of Section 10 (1)(c) of IGST Act 2017, the place of supply is Thailand and the supplier is in India, therefore the supply could get covered under the ambit of Inter-State Supply in terms of IGST Act, but IGST levy can be imposed only to supplies within the territorial jurisdiction of the IGST Act. The applicant has stated that the supply in the case at hand takes place outside the territorial jurisdiction of IGST Act and thereby not subject to IGST and has sought to clarify the applicability of GST in the said transaction.
 
Further, the applicant contends that the said transaction does not constituteimport of goods as there is no physical movement of goods into India. Thus thetransactions do not qualify as an inter-state or intra state supply of goods andwould fall outside the purview of CGST/SGST/IGST. They have also stated thattransaction was not taxable under the erstwhile indirect tax.
Further, the applicant has submitted that if at all tax is applicable on thetransaction then input tax credit of the same should be available to the recipient of Supply. The applicant has stated that ITCshould be applicable as per section 16(2)(b) of CGST Act 2017. The Applicantcontends that if a transaction is hold to be liable qua the supplier and not thegoods or services or both, then in the same analogy on the very transaction thecredit of input tax needs to be allowed based on the recipient and not whether thegoods or services or both had been received or not. If the transaction is deemed to be an inter-state supply and if the same is made liable to GST, then it should be deemed that such goods have been received from perspective and the credit shouldaccordingly be made available to him.
 
M/s. Nissan Motors India Pvt Ltd had placed an order for manufacture of tool/mould basis which  the applicant has placed an order for manufacturing the same with MSC Thailand. The 'Tool Ownership Certificate' is issued by the applicant on NMIPL as transfer of title in ownership of tools on payment of consideration.The tools shall be property of NMIPL only. The cost of the mould   has not   been   amortized   in the present transaction.The price of the manufactured mould/tools has been received by the applicant by raising a separate invoice.
 
Reasoning of Advance Ruling:-
 
The Act limits the Advance Ruling Authority to decide the issues earmarked for it under Section 97(2) and no other issue can be decided by the Advance Ruling Authority. Of the above questions on which ruling is sought by the applicant, relates to eligibility to credit of tax paid by them at their buyers'end.
 
The eligibility to credit of input tax paid by the applicant alone is covered underclause (d) of Section 97(2) above and the eligibility at the buyers' hand when raised by an applicant do not fall under any of the category specified under Section 97(2)of the Act and therefore not within the ambit of this authority.
 
However, the authority has given its ruling for the first question raised about GST taxability on transfer of title in moulds from applicant to Indian Buyer.
Taking into consideration, Vendor Tooling PO and Tool Ownership Certificate', it is evident that the moulds and tools shall upon completion of the cycle life of the moulds be disposed off in the premises of such parts manufacturer as maybe agreed in the future between the parties/ approval of Nissan Motors India Pvt Ltd.
The moulds/tools remains with the manufacturer for manufacturing the parts, i.e., the moulds aresupplied free of cost to the parts manufacturer and it is stated that the cost of themoulds are not amortised in the parts cost.
 
Supply is defined under Section 7 of the CGST Act 2017 andthe same is reproduced below for reference:
 
7. (1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression "supply" includes-
 
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer,barter, exchange, Iicence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be madefor a consideration be a person in the course or furtherance of business;
 
(1A) where certain activities or transactions constitute a supply in accordancewith the provisions of sub-section (1), they shall be treated either as supply ofgoods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.;
 
 
Schedule II determines the list of activities to be considered as supply ofgoods/Services and entry Sl.No. 1 is as follows:
 
1. Transfer
 
(a) any transfer of the title in goods is a supply of goods;
 
From the above, it is evident that 'transfer of the title in goods' is supply of goods.In the case at hand there is transfer in title of moulds for a consideration and thesupply is in the course of business therefore, the same constitutes supply of goodsand GST is liable to be paid on such supply.
 
Ruling:-
  • GST is applicable on the transfer of title in moulds from the appellant to the India Buyer.
  • The Question is not answered as the same is not in the ambit of this authority as per section 97(2) of the Act.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com