Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2020-2021/3557

Whether GST will be applicable on the transfer of title in moulds from applicant to Indian buyer?
Automative Components Technology India Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Order No. 05/ARA/2020 dated 31.01.2020
 
Brief Facts: -The applicant is engaged in the supply of automotive components. They have stated that they agree to supply certain parts, including moulds to Indian Company located in the State of Tamil Nadu, for which they place an order for manufacturing the said parts and moulds on a Thailand Company. The parts manufactured are physically imported, while the moulds developed are retained in Thailand and are not physically imported into India, but the ownership in the mould is transferred from the foreign supplier to the Applicant and from the applicant to the Indian buyer by raising of separate invoices. Thus, with regard to the moulds, there are two transactions involved inthe present case:
 
T1: Transfer of title in moulds from the foreign supplier to the Applicant.
 
T2: Transfer of title in moulds from the Applicant to the Indian buyer.
 
They have also stated that the moulds are never physically imported into India. Themoulds will be disposed as waste in Thailand after its usage for manufacturing the requisite parts.
 
Issue:-
  • Whether GST will be applicable on the transfer of title in moulds from applicant to Indian buyer?
  • If yes, whether the Indian buyer would be eligible to take credit of the GST paid to the applicant for said purchase?
 
 Appellant’s Contention:- The applicant on his interpretation of law has stated that on application of Section 10 (1)(c) of IGST Act 2017, the place of supply is Thailand and the supplier is in India, therefore the supply could get covered under the ambit of Inter-State Supply in terms of IGST Act, but IGST levy can be imposed only to supplies within the territorial jurisdiction of the IGST Act. The applicant has stated that the supply in the case at hand takes place outside the territorial jurisdiction of IGST Act and thereby not subject to IGST and has sought to clarify the applicability of GST in the said transaction.
 
Further, the applicant contends that the said transaction does not constituteimport of goods as there is no physical movement of goods into India. Thus thetransactions do not qualify as an inter-state or intra state supply of goods andwould fall outside the purview of CGST/SGST/IGST. They have also stated thattransaction was not taxable under the erstwhile indirect tax.
Further, the applicant has submitted that if at all tax is applicable on thetransaction then input tax credit of the same should be available to the recipient of Supply. The applicant has stated that ITCshould be applicable as per section 16(2)(b) of CGST Act 2017. The Applicantcontends that if a transaction is hold to be liable qua the supplier and not thegoods or services or both, then in the same analogy on the very transaction thecredit of input tax needs to be allowed based on the recipient and not whether thegoods or services or both had been received or not. If the transaction is deemed to be an inter-state supply and if the same is made liable to GST, then it should be deemed that such goods have been received from perspective and the credit shouldaccordingly be made available to him.
 
M/s. Nissan Motors India Pvt Ltd had placed an order for manufacture of tool/mould basis which  the applicant has placed an order for manufacturing the same with MSC Thailand. The 'Tool Ownership Certificate' is issued by the applicant on NMIPL as transfer of title in ownership of tools on payment of consideration.The tools shall be property of NMIPL only. The cost of the mould   has not   been   amortized   in the present transaction.The price of the manufactured mould/tools has been received by the applicant by raising a separate invoice.
 
Reasoning of Advance Ruling:-
 
The Act limits the Advance Ruling Authority to decide the issues earmarked for it under Section 97(2) and no other issue can be decided by the Advance Ruling Authority. Of the above questions on which ruling is sought by the applicant, relates to eligibility to credit of tax paid by them at their buyers'end.
 
The eligibility to credit of input tax paid by the applicant alone is covered underclause (d) of Section 97(2) above and the eligibility at the buyers' hand when raised by an applicant do not fall under any of the category specified under Section 97(2)of the Act and therefore not within the ambit of this authority.
 
However, the authority has given its ruling for the first question raised about GST taxability on transfer of title in moulds from applicant to Indian Buyer.
Taking into consideration, Vendor Tooling PO and Tool Ownership Certificate', it is evident that the moulds and tools shall upon completion of the cycle life of the moulds be disposed off in the premises of such parts manufacturer as maybe agreed in the future between the parties/ approval of Nissan Motors India Pvt Ltd.
The moulds/tools remains with the manufacturer for manufacturing the parts, i.e., the moulds aresupplied free of cost to the parts manufacturer and it is stated that the cost of themoulds are not amortised in the parts cost.
 
Supply is defined under Section 7 of the CGST Act 2017 andthe same is reproduced below for reference:
 
7. (1) For the purposes of this Act, the expression "supply" includes-
 
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer,barter, exchange, Iicence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be madefor a consideration be a person in the course or furtherance of business;
 
(1A) where certain activities or transactions constitute a supply in accordancewith the provisions of sub-section (1), they shall be treated either as supply ofgoods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.;
 
 
Schedule II determines the list of activities to be considered as supply ofgoods/Services and entry Sl.No. 1 is as follows:
 
1. Transfer
 
(a) any transfer of the title in goods is a supply of goods;
 
From the above, it is evident that 'transfer of the title in goods' is supply of goods.In the case at hand there is transfer in title of moulds for a consideration and thesupply is in the course of business therefore, the same constitutes supply of goodsand GST is liable to be paid on such supply.
 
Ruling:-
  • GST is applicable on the transfer of title in moulds from the appellant to the India Buyer.
  • The Question is not answered as the same is not in the ambit of this authority as per section 97(2) of the Act.
Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com