Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2014-15/2125

Whether export of service under BAS is leviable to service tax?

Case:-M/S ALPINE MODULAR INTERIORS (P) LTD. Versus CST (ADJUDICATION), NEW DELHI

Citation:-2014 –TIOL-517- CESTAT-DEL

Brief fact:- The order dated 25/05/12 passed by the learned Commissioner, Service Tax, Delhi confirmed the service tax demand of Rs. 72,43,736/- apart from interest and penalties, for having provided Business Auxiliary Service to an overseas corporate entity UB Office Systems Ltd., a resident entity of Hong Kong (hereinafter UBOS), during April 2005 to September 2009 and October 2009 to September 2010. Proceedings were initiated under two show cause notices dated 22/10/10 and 13/04/11 for the respective periods in issue. The appellant (hereinafter referred to as AMIL) provided certain services to UBOS under an agreement dated 02/01/02. The scope of the services provided by AMIL are evaluation of market trends and identification of prospective customers in India for the overseas entity, for its modular furniture business; and providing a list of prospective customers on a regular basis to enable UBOS to strategise its decisions, for sale of its products to customers. The agreement also records a clear stipulation that the ultimate customer shall deal directly with UBOS and remit payments against supplies received, to UBOS, with a specific stipulation that AMIL is not authorized to collect any payments from customers on behalf of the foreign entity. The agreement clearly stipulates that goods would be supplied by UBOS directly to the customers. Clause 2 of the agreement stipulates that UBOS shall pay commission in U.S. dollars at the stipulated rates (in percentage terms) to AMIL for every successful sale made by UBOS in India. The agreement between the parties also stipulates that AMIL should bear the minor and incidental expenditure incurred for assembly of the finished components at customer's premises, for or on behalf of UBOS; that reimbursement of these expenses is not estimated to be more than 1% of the FOB value of the products and is included in the commission payable by UBOS to the appellant AMIL. Revenue initiated proceedings on an allegation that AMIL provided Business Auxiliary Service to the overseas entity and was liable to remit service tax. The above defence was negated by the Adjudicating Authority resulting in confirmation of the demand of tax, interest and penalty, as adverted to supra.
Appellant’s contention:- Before the Adjudicating Authority AMIL contended that Business Auxiliary Service provided to UBOS amounts to export of service within the ambit of Export of Service Rules, 2005, since from the nature of the services provided, these were utilized by the recipient outside India; that it received consideration in convertible foreign exchange; and is therefore, excluded from exigibility of the tax, under provisions of the 2005 Rules. The appellant does not contest the classification of the service provided as being BAS.

Respondent’s contention:- The respondent would however contended that the judgment in Paul Merchants Ltd. vs. CCE, Chandigarh (supra) and in GAP International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. CST, Delhi (supra) have not correctly comprehended the scope and trajectory of provisions of the Export of Service Rules, 2005 nor Board Circular No. 141/10/2011-TRU dated 13/05/2011.

Reasoning of judgment:- Larger Bench of this Tribunal in Paul Merchants Ltd. vs. CCE, Chandigarh reported in 2013 (29) S.T.R. 257 (Tri. Del.) = (2012-TIOL-1877-CESTAT-DEL) considered substantially analogous facts and the relevant statutory provisions and concluded that the transactions fall within the ambit of Export of Service Rules, 2005 and are not therefore liable to levy of service tax. This view was reiterated in the recent decision of this Tribunal dated 28/02/14 in an appeal preferred by M/s GAP International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. CST, Delhi, Service Tax appeal No. 819 of 2008 = (2014-TIOL-465-CESTAT-DEL). It also added that the invitation by Revenue to ignore the law declared by the Larger Bench in Paul Merchants Ltd. vs. CCE, Chandigarh (supra) and reiterated in GAP International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. CST, Delhi (supra) is unacceptable. It was axiomatic that decisions of this Tribunal are binding on Revenue. Once the Tribunal pronounces a verdict after consideration of the relevant legal environment, the executive branch and an adjudicator at a lower level in the hierarchy is bound by such verdict, subject only to remedies within the judicial branch or appropriate and constitutionally permitted legislative curatives. They were informed that the respondent has preferred an appeal against Paul Merchants Ltd. vs. CCE, Chandigarh (supra) and the same is under the consideration before the Punjab & Haryana High Court. In the circumstances, the respondent cannot be heard to contend that there were errors in the declaration of law by the Larger Bench. The contention on behalf of the respondent was therefore fundamentally mis-conceived and rejected out of hand. The transactions in issue in the present appeal were identical to issues presented in the appeal preferred by M/s GAP International Sourcing (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. CST, Delhi (supra) and substantially analogous to the facts that were considered in Paul Merchants Ltd. vs. CCE, Chandigarh (supra). On application of these precedents, the impugned order passed by the learned Commissioner, New Delhi dated 25/05/2010 could not be sustained. It was therefore quashed. There shall however be no order as to costs.

Decision:- Appeal allowed.

Comment:- The essence of the case is that if service is provided to the recipient who is outside India by a service provider situated in India and the consideration for the services is received in foreign convertible currency, then the services are treated as Export of Service. The export of services is not leviable to service tax. Moreover, the case also lays down the ratio that mere filing of appeal before higher appellate forum cannot be a ground to deny the applicability of a particular decision.   

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com