Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2636

Whether dharmada charges and freight charges includible in assessable value?

Case:-  SHREYANS INDUSTRIES LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., JALANDHAR
 
Citation:-  2014 (303) E.L.T. 562 (Tri. - Del.)
 

 
Brief Facts:- The appellant are manufacturers of paper and paperboard chargeable to Central Excise duty. The point of dispute in this case is from March, 2000 to June, 2001. During this period, the appellant recovered dharmada charges @ 0.25% of the value of the goods from their customers and in addition to this, recovered transit insurance charges @ 0.2% of the value of the goods. Beside this, they recovered freight charges on the actual basis. All these charges were being recovered by issuing debit notes. The point of dispute is as to whether these charges were includible in the assessable value of the goods or not. The Department was of the view that dharmada charges, insurance charges and the freight charges being charged on the actual basis were includible in the assessable value of the goods. On this basis, two show cause notices dated 31-7-2001 and 5-4-2002 were issued to the appellant for recovery of allegedly short-paid excise duty amounting to Rs. 1,81,107/- and Rs. 88,989/- respectively for the period from March, 2000 to February, 2001 and from March, 2001 to June, 2001 respectively. The show cause notices were adjudicated by the Assistant Commissioner vide Order-in-Original dated 7-11-2003 by which he dropped the proceedings. The Revenue filed review appeals against this order of the Assistant Commissioner before the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Commissioner (Appeals) vide Order-in-Appeal dated 30th July, 2004 allowed the appeals and confirmed both the demands totalling Rs. 2,70,097/- and beside this, also imposed penalty on them under Rule 173Q. Against this order of the Commissioner (Appeals), this appeal has been filed.
 
Appellant’s Contention:- Shri Jatin Singhal, Advocate and Ms. Surabhi Sinha, Advocate, the learned Counsels for the appellant, pleaded that transit insurance charges and freight charges were not includible in the assessable value, that in respect of the period prior to 1-7-2000, there was a specific provision for sub-section (2) of Section 4 providing for exclusion of the freight charges from the assessable value, that in respect of the period w.e.f. 1-7-2000, in accordance with the provisions of Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000, the charges for freight and transit insurance were not includible in the assessable value when the same are separately shown in the invoices, that though in this case, the freight and transit insurance were not mentioned in the Central Excise invoices, the same had been charged separately by debit notes and this amounts to charging separately for the freight and transit insurance, that in any case since the transaction value of the goods is required to be at the time and place of removal and there is no dispute that the sale of the goods was from the factory gate, the freight and insurance charges cannot be included in the assessable value, that as regards dharmada charges, the same is not includible in the assessable value in view of judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Mohan & Co., Madras v. CCE, Madras reported in 1987 (30)E.L.T.624 (Tribunal), the civil appeal against which was dismissed by the Apex Court vide judgment reported in 1997 (91) E.L.T. A232 (S.C.), that same view had been taken by the Tribunal in the case of Associated Soapstone Distributing Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Indore reported in 2002 (146)E.L.T.324 (Tri.-Del.), the civil appeal against which was dismissed by the Apex Court vide judgment reported in 2003 (154) E.L.T. A254 (S.C.), wherein the Apex Court relied upon its earlier judgment in the case of Mohan & Co., Madras v. CCE, Madras (supra) and that in view of this, the impugned order is not sustainable.
 
Respondent’s Contention:- Shri M.S. Negi, the learned DR, defended the impugned order by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals). With regard to freight and transit insurance, he pleaded that since the same have not been shown separately in the invoices, in view of Rule 5 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, the same have to be included in the assessable value. As regards dharmada charges, he cited the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of CCE v. Panchmukhi Engg. Works reported in 2003 (158)E.L.T.550(S.C.), wherein the Apex Court relying upon its earlier judgment in the case of Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Jamshedpur reported in 2002 (146)E.L.T.3 (S.C.)has held that dharmada charges are includible in the assessable value, that the Apex court in its judgment in the case of Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Jamshedpur (supra) had considered the Tribunal’s judgment in the case of Mohan & Co., Madras v. CCE, Madras (supra) and had overruled the same and had affirmed the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of SAIL v. CCE reported in 1997 (90)E.L.T.502 (Tribunal) on this issue and overruled the judgment of Larger Bench of the Tribunal in case ofSAIL v. CCE, Bhubaneswar reported in 2000 (119)E.L.T.249.
 
Reasoning of Judgement:- Submissions from both the sides are considered.As regards, the inclusion of freight being charged by the appellant from their customers on actual basis, and transit insurance being charged @ 0.2% of the price in the assessable value, it is  find that since there is no dispute that the appellant’s sales were at the factory gate and during the period up to 30-6-2000, the assessable value was the normal price at the time and place of removal and during the period from 1-7-2000, the assessable value is the transaction value at the time and place of removal and since the place of removal undisputedly is the factory gate, the amounts being charged for freight and insurance would not be includible in the assessable value of the goods. Moreover, when the freight and insurance were being charged separately under debit notes which are like invoices, it cannot be said that the freight and insurance charges were not being separately charged. Therefore, the impugned order upholding the Central Excise duty demand on the freight and insurance charges is not sustainable and has to be set aside. As regards dharmada charges, we find that first judgment of the Tribunal on this issue was in the case of Mohan & Co., Madras v. CCE, Madras (supra), the civil appeal against which was dismissed by the Apex Court. The Tribunal’s subsequent judgment on this issue in the case of Associated Soapstone Distributing Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Indore (supra) relies upon its earlier judgment in the case of Mohan & Co., Madras v. CCE, Madras (supra) and while dismissing the civil appeal against this judgment, the Apex Court relied upon the dismissal of civil appeal against the Tribunal’s judgment in the case of Mohan & Co., Madras v. CCE, Madras (supra). However, we find that in the case of Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Jamshedpur reported in 2002 (146)E.L.T.3 (S.C.), the Apex Court on the very issue of inclusion of dharmada charges in the assessable value, has taken a contrary view holding that the same would be includible in the assessable value and in this judgment has overruled the judgment of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in case of SAIL v. CCE, Bhubaneswar reported in 2000 (119)E.L.T.249and also the Tribunal’s judgment in case of Mohan & Co., Madras v. CCE, Madras (supra). The Apex Court’s judgment in the case of CCE v. Panchmukhi Engg. Works (supra) is based on its earlier judgment in the case of Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Jamshedpur (supra). In our view, since the Apex Court in its judgment dated 24-10-2002, in the case of Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Jamshedpur (supra), after considering its earlier judgment in the case of Mohan & Co., Madras v. CCE, Madras (supra) and overruling it has taken a view that dharmada charges are includible in the assessable value of the goods and it is this judgment which has been followed by the Apex Court in the case of CCE v. Panchmukhi Engg. Works (supra), it is the Apex Court’s view in the case of Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. CCE, Jamshedpur (supra) and in the case of CCE v. Panchmukhi Engg. Works (supra) which would have to be treated as its final view and would hold the field. In view of this, we hold that dharmada charges are includible in the assessable value and as such there is no infirmity in the order of Commissioner (Appeals) on this point.
 
In view of the above findings, the appeal is partly allowed.

Decision:- Appeal is partly allowed.

Comment:-The crux of the case is that freight and insurance charges are not to be included in the assessable value because transaction value of goods is the value at the factory gate. Moreover, separate invoices were raised for freight and insurance charges on actual basis which indicated that the said charges were not essential condition for sale. However, dharmada charges will form part of the assessable value in view of the Apex Court decision.

Submitted By:- Somya Jain

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com