Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2016-17/3149

Whether Department can impose penalty under section 11AC when penalty under Rule 25 was invoked?

Case:-COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE-II VERSUS GNAT FOUNDRY PVT. LTD.

Issue:-  Whether Department can impose penalty under section 11AC when penalty under Rule 25 was invoked?
 
Brief Facts:-The facts of the case are that the respondents are engaged in the manufacture of Cast Iron Casting and Cast Steel Castings. On the basis of intelligence, Preventive Officers visited the factory premises on 10-7-2003 and recorded the statements wherein it was stated that entries in the note book are made by one Shri K.T. Yezare and that they had supplied from their factory, the cast steel casting of Trunnion Bracket, Trunnion Shoe and Pit to M/s. R.A. Somavanshi without preparing invoice/bill, also without accounting in their Daily Stock Account and without payment of Central Excise duty. Therefore show cause notice was issued for clandestine removal of the goods for demanding duty along with interest and penalty also proposed on them under provisions of Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The respondent filed an appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) who after scrutinized their document reduced the duty demand of Rs. 1,79,527/- along with interest but penalty of Rs. 2,08,253/- under Section 11AC was set aside following the decision of Machino Montell (I) Ltd.- 2004 (62) RLT 709 = 2004 (168) E.L.T. 466 (Tri.) wherein it was held that when the duty has been paid before issuance of show cause notice, no penalties are imposable under Section 11AC. Aggrieved by the same, the Revenue came in appeal before Tribunal.
Appellant Contentions:- The learned DR submitted that it is a case of clandestine removal of goods without payment of Central Excise Duty which has been admitted by the respondent, hence there is suppression of fact with intent to evade payment of Central Excise Duty. To support his contention he placed reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India v. Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills - 2009 (238)E.L.T.3 (S.C.)wherein it was held that mandatory penalty under Section 11AC is to be imposed if it is found that the assessee has escaped the payment of duty with an intention to evade payment of duty. The decision relied upon by the Commissioner (Appeals) is no more good law in present scenario. Hence the impugned order is to be set aside.
 
Respondent Contentions:-On the other hand, the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent submitted that in this case penalty has been proposed under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944. He further submitted that in the show cause notice there was no proposal of mandatory penalty under Section 11AC hence the penalty under Section 11AC is not imposable. To support his contention he relied on Schrader Duncan Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai-III - 2010 (251) E.L.T. 290 (Tri.-Mumbai)wherein this Tribunal has held that show cause notice issued involving Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 reflects misconceptions of author of show cause notice and it was held that this is a case where the department wanted to penalize the appellant under Rule 25 and the authorities below chose to venture into the domain of Section 11AC, which was not warranted in this case. In this view of the matter, penalty imposed on the assessee was set aside. Hence the penalty should not be levied on the respondent.
 
Reasoning of Judgment:- On careful examination of the show cause notice, it was found that the show cause notice has made a proposal of penalty under the provision of Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. In show cause notice there is no proposal to penalize the respondent under Section 11AC of the Act and in the case of Schrader Duncan Ltd. (supra) this Tribunal has held that when there is a proposal under Rule 25 of the Rules no penalty can be levied under Section 11AC. As in the case of Schrader Duncan Ltd. (supra) the penal provision invoked in the show cause notice where Rule 25 of the Rules read with Section 11 of the Act the original authority invoked Section 11AC and the same was confirmed by the appellate authority. The facts of this case for invoking penal provision are identical to the case cited by the learned Advocate. Following the ratio of the case cited by the learned Advocate, Tribunal was also of the view that no penalties under Section 11AC be imposed on the respondent in this case also. Accordingly, impugned order is upheld. Appeal filed by the Revenue is rejected.
 
Decision:-  Appeal rejected.

Comment:- The gist of the case is that when department has issued show cause notice for proposal of penalty under the provision of Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules. 2002, it cannot impose penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This view is supported by decision given in the case of Schrader Duncan Ltd.
 
Prepared by: Mahesh Parmar

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com