Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT *  Mere Uploading Of GST Order On Portal Is Not “Valid” Service: Tripura HC *  CGST Can Proceed Even If SGST Closed Similar Case Earlier: Delhi HC *  SC upholds 28% GST on online gaming with retrospective effect. *  West Bengal Govt cuts E-way Bill Threshold limit to Rs. 50,000 for intra-state goods movement. *  Criminal Prosecution Under Central Excise Act Can’t Continue After CESTAT Sets Aside Duty Demand on Merits: Punjab & Haryana High Court. *  Madras High Court Quashes GST Assessment Orders for Denial of Personal Hearing; Remands Matter Subject to 10% Deposit *  Ex Parte GST Order: Madras High Court Directs Immediate Removal of Bank/ITC Attachment Upon 25% Deposit *  J.K. Cement Receives GST Demand Order of Rs 8,02,113/- from Ahmedabad Tax Authority *  Delhi Police EOW Busts Alleged Rs. 128 Crore GST Fake Invoice Network. *  REPLY TO SCN CAN’T BE TREATED AS “EMPTY FORMALITY”: ORISSA HIGH COURT QUASHES GST DEMAND OF RS. 57.30 LAKH *  Challenge to CGST Provisions restricting ITC to Bonafide Purchasers : Allahabad HC issues notice *  CBIC Notifies Revised Customs Tariff Values for Edible Oils, Gold, Silver, Brass Scrap and Areca Nuts *  Delhi HC Orders Removal of GST Attachment After Statutory 1 Year Period Expired *  GSTAT Extends Relaxed Appeal Filing Guidelines till December 31, 2026 *  AO fails to Provide Import - Export Data from DGFT to Taxpayer for Reconciliation *  Gold, Silver Imports To Get Costlier As Govt Raises Customs Duty To 10%  *  GSTAT Enables Pre-Payment Access to Document Upload and Checklist for GST Appeal Filing *  GST Portal Restrictions Can’t Override Statute: Gujarat HC Allows Cross-State Transfer Of CGST ITC After Amalgamation *  Centre Revises HS Codes for Large Diameter Steel Pipes Used in Oil & Gas Pipelines *  Customs Duty Liability Arises On Warehouse Clearance Date: Supreme Court *  Government lifts export ban on de-oiled rice bran *  CESTAT Grants 12% Interest on Pre-Deposit for Investigation from Date of Deposit till Refund and Denies Interest on Interest. *  Government Overhauls GST Classification Framework for Non-Alcoholic Beverages; Fruit Juice Drinks, Milk-Based Beverages and Caffeinated Drinks to Attract Revised 5% and 40% GST Rates from May 1, 2026 *  India’s gross GST collections hit a record Rs 2.42 lakh crore in April, up 8.7% *  Customs clearance stalled, revenue hit over MRP dispute *  Shipping Corporation explores Middle East routes as Hormuz tensions disrupt cargo movement *  India, Kenya signs MoU for exchange of pre-arrival customs information *  No demand of Taxes under Reverse Charge if Tax Already Discharged by Service Provider under forward charge *  The India-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement, signed "once-in-a-generation" deal that eliminates tariffs on 100% of Indian exports to New Zealand
Subject News *  Consignment Sales Can’t Be Reclassified as Inter-State Sales Based on Pre-Agreement Evidence: CESTAT *  Exporter Can’t Be Denied Advance Authorization Benefit Due To ICEGATE Technical Glitch: Delhi High Court *  No GST Demand For Mere Wrong Set-Off Of IGST Credit Under CGST And SGST Heads: Kerala HC. *  Cenvat Credit Can’t Be Denied on Input Services Having Nexus With Manufacturing Activities: CESTAT *  Pending Proceedings Can’t Survive Without Saving Clause: Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 6.28 Crore After Omission of Rule 96(10) *  Madras HC Quashes GST Demands on TASMAC (Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation) Bar Licence Fee *  GST Proceedings Cannot Survive Omitted Rule Without Saving Clause: Calcutta HC *  Provisional Release Can’t Be Denied Solely On Dept. Suspicion Of Misclassification And Undervaluation Of Imported Goods: CESTAT *  Businesses Should Not Be Kept Outside GST Regime Without Due Process: Gauhati High Court *  Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Reconsideration of Contractors’ Claim for Additional GST Payment After Tax Rate Hike From 12% to 18% *  S. 108 Statements Can’t Be Sole Basis Without Following Section 138B Procedure: CESTAT *  Bombay High Court Frames Key Questions on Mandatory Distribution of ITC U/s 20 CGST Act *  Filing of Annexure-B for Refund Applications involving Accumulated ITC using the offline utility in GST portal: GSTN *  No Service Tax on Parent Company’s Un-Invoiced Cost Allocations Without Actual Service or Consideration: CESTAT  *  Calcutta High Court Upholds GST Classification of Polypropylene Leno Bags as Plastic Products *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  GSTAT Issues Major Bench Allocation Framework; All Appeals to First Go Before Division Bench *  ITC Blocking Without Reasoned Order Violates Rule 86A; Punjab & Haryana HC Directs Release of Credit *  Allahabad HC Refuses Bail to CGST Superintendent In Rs. 70 Lakh Bribery Case *  S.130 Can’t Be Invoked Without Prior Tax Determination U/s 73/74: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Confiscation Proceedings *  SC grants Bail to Rs 54cr GST case  *  Karnataka HC Sets Aside Duplicate GST Orders, Orders Fresh Hearing on GSTIN Cancellation *  DRC-01 Summary Can’t Replace Mandatory SCN: Gauhati High Court *  Transfer Of Unutilized ITC After Amalgamation - Supreme Court Issues Notice *  PUNJAB & HARYANA HC QUASHES GST CANCELLATION NOTICE FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE CBIC ENQUIRY REPORT *  LICENSE FEE, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CHARGES NOT INCLUDIBLE IN CUSTOMS VALUE UNLESS THEY ARE A CONDITION OF SALE: CESTAT *  DELHI HC ORDERS REMOVAL OF GST ATTACHMENT AFTER STATUTORY 1 YEAR PERIOD EXPIRED *  CUSTOMS BROKER CAN’T BE FAULTED JUST BECAUSE EXPORTER’S GST REGISTRATION WAS PREVIOUSLY CANCELLED: CESTAT   *  Supreme Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Delhi HC Ruling Holding Real Operator Behind Fake GST Firms Liable As ‘Taxable Person  *  GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because DRC-07 Was Not Uploaded On Portal: Bombay High Court  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2946

Whether delayed payment of duty, but before issuance of SCN, attracts penalty?

Case:-COMMR. OF C. EX., TIRUNELVELI VERSUS SRI RAMJI FIREWORKS INDUSTRIES
 
Citation:- 2015 (317) E.L.T. 443 (Mad.)
 
Brief facts:- The respondent herein had been engaged in the business of fire­works. During the years 1994, 1995 and 1996 the respondent had distributed some gift boxes even without paying duty. Under the said circumstances, show-cause notice, dated 7-9-1998 had been issued wherein the demand of duty, interest coupled with penalty were mentioned. The demand made in show-cause notice had been upheld in Order-in-Original, dated 24-5-1999 and the same had been agitated before the Commissioner of Appeals. The Commissioner of Appeals had dismissed the appeal filed by the respondent and subsequently, the respondent had filed Appeal No. E/443/2003 before the CESTAT.
The CESTAT, after hearing both sides, allowed the appeal in part and set aside the demand made by the Department with regard to penalty and upheld the demand made with regard to duty and interest. Against the disallowed portion, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal had been preferred at the instance of the Department as appellant.
 
 
Appellant’s contention:- The learned counsel appearing for the appellant meticulously drew the attention of the Court to the provision of Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 which deals with penalty in case of short levied or erroneously refunded or non-payment of duty.
 
Respondent’s contention:-Even though the respondent had been served with summons, appearance had not been made. Under the said circumstances, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was disposed off on merits on the basis of the contentions put forth on the side of the appellant.
 
Reasoning of judgement:- At the time of admitting the present Appeal, the following substantial question of law had been settled for consideration : -
“Whether the CESTAT is right in dismissing the appeal and vacating the mandatory penalties imposed when there is a plethora of conflicting decision on the same issue by various higher appellate forums/authorities?”
The present claim of penalty came within the purview of non-payment.
It was seen from the records that the respondent had to pay Central Excise Duty in the years 1994, 1995 and 1996, but they paid duty only on 5-11-1997. Even though, the respondent had paid duty on 5-11-1997 and that too prior to issuance of show cause notice, dated 7-9-1998, the respondent could not absolve its liability from paying penalty under the Section mentioned supra.
The CESTAT without properly considering the said provision had simply found that since before the issuance of show cause notice the respondent had paid Central Excise Duty, it need not pay penalty. Since the said Section deals with short levy or short payment or erroneous refund and non-payment, this Court was of the view that the approach made by the CESTAT with regard to penalty was totally erroneous and therefore, the order passed by the CESTAT was liable to be set aside and the substantial question of law settled in the present Appeal was having substance.
In fine, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was allowed without costs and the Final Order No. 725 of 2008 in Appeal No. E/443/2003 passed by the CESTAT with regard to penalty was set aside. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition was closed.
 
Decision:- Appeal allowed.
 
Comment:- The main question to be dealt in this case was that- whether delayed payment of duty before issuance of SCN attracts penalty or not? To answer this question Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was referred to. Since the said Section deals with short levy or short payment or erroneous refund and non-payment, Court was of the view that the approach made by the CESTAT with regard to penalty was totally erroneous. No matter whether the duty has been paid before issuance of SCN or not- delay in payment of duty attracts penalty and the same has to be paid.
 
Prepared By- Sharad Bang
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com