Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *  The GSTN has issued an Advisory dated 21.04.2026 about the introduction of an Offline Tool for the Invoice Management System (IMS)  *  CBIC extends due dates for filing of FORM GSTR 3B  for the month of April 2026 *  Interest cannot be imposed in adjudication order, if not demanded/quantified in show cause notice : Allahabad HC *  Wheelchairs with toileting facility eligible for exemption: CESTAT affirms customs duty exemption to importer *  Industries urge GST council to allow inverted duty refunds on input services *  Tamil Nadu GST dept introduced virtual hearing facility for GST appeals under under section 107 of the TNGST act: detailed guidelines  *  CIC urges authorities to implement GST evasion complaint tracking system *  Even if the assessee opts "NO" for personal hearing in form DRC-06 ,The mandatory requirement under section 75(4) to grant opportunity of hearing cannot be waived:Gujarat High Court  *  Glufosinate imports curbs imposed by govt *  Government extends Re-import period for exported cut & polished diamonds *  CIC flags lack of tracking system for tax evasion complaints,urges GST authorities to improve transparency *  No Custodial Interrogation needed in GST fraud case based on documentary evidence already in Department's Possession : Chattisgarh HC *  Orders under section cannot be sustained if passed without considering the taxpayer's objections and without granting a personal hearing:Gujarat High Court *  Mere cancellation of supplier's registration cannot,by itself,justify denial of ITC or cancellation of the recipient's registration:Bombay High Court *  High Court sets aside GST notice citing factual errors and natural justice violations *  Provisional Bank Attachment under Section. 110 of Customs Act Unsustainable Beyond Statutory period without Extension order: Bombay HC orders to defreeze accounts *  Post Clearance MRP Alteration by Distributor Does not attract Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT *  DGFT Expands scope of 'Screws' classification under RoDTEP Scheme  *  E-way bills surze to all time high of 140.6 million in March *  GST Exemption Allowed on Pure Labour Services for Standalone Houses: AAR  *  GST Payable Only on Margin in Second-Hand Car Sales, Subject to Strict Conditions and No ITC Claim: AAR *  DGFT rolls out procedure for allocation of calcined coke *  GST portal update : Pre-deposit amount now editable in Appeals *  J&K HC declared TMT scrap a 'Specified Good' eligibile for GST refunds under Support Scheme  *  Pigmy agents are employees of banks; no GST can be levied on commission  paid to them : Karnataka HC *  DGFT Revises HS Code Description for Screws Under RoDTEP *  GST Registration Cancellation Invalid Without Proper Service of Notice: Allahabad High Court. *  Bengaluru CGST | GST Backlog Appeals Deadline Fixed at June 30, 2026 *  No Time Bar on Refund of Service Tax for Services Not Rendered: CESTAT  Remands Indiabulls Case for Unjust Enrichment Check. *  Supreme Court Holds Renewable Energy Incentive Must Benefit Generators, Not Be Adjusted in Tariff
Subject News *   Delhi HC Quashes Order, Says Reminder Cannot Validate Improperly Served GST SCN *  KARNATAKA HIGH COURT REMANDS GST SHORTFALL MATTER DUE TO ABSENCE OF PERSONAL HEARING   *  CESTAT cancels confiscation and penalties on imported computer cabinet cases: Custom duty restricted to 111 surplus units *  Deposit of tax during search or investigation cannot be treated as 'Voluntary Payment' : Bombay High Court *  Section 76 of the CGST cannot be invoked where the tax has already been duly deposited, even if through another registration of the same entity: Madras High Court *  Sec 74 allows use of material regardless of source; illegality or flaws in section 67 search do not vitiate valid adjudication: HC *  Inter-State transfer of ITC on Amalgamation permissible as given under section 18(3) read with rule 41 of the CGST rules, 2017: Gujarat High Court *  HC: No GST on commisson paid to Pigmy Agents *  IGST refund denial on illegible bill of lading invalid absent chance to furnish docs; merit reconsideration in appeals directed: HC *  ITC is not admissible on GST paid on leasehold rights of land used fpr setting up an air seperation plant: AAAR,Tamil Nadu *  GST: No penalty under Section 74 after voluntary ITC reversal due to non-existent supplier : High Court *  TN AAAR denies GST ITC on Land Lease under Sec. 17(5)(d) for setting up plant and machinery *  GST proceedings quashed as notices sent to old address, despite updated address in registration *  Importer Can’t Be Penalised for Alleged IGCR Procedural Lapses Without Evidence of Departmental Error: CESTAT *  Structured Healthcare Training Not ‘Charitable Activity’, 18% GST Payable: AAR  *  CESTAT As The Appellate Authority For Central Sales Tax Disputes: A Paradigm Shift Under Finance Act, 2023 *   Rs. 25K Cost Imposed On SGST Joint Commissioner for Attaching Bank  Accounts Without Forming Mandatory “Opinion”: Bombay HC *   Ex-Parte GST Order Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice: Karnataka  High Court Quashes Adjudication and Bank Attachment.  *   Retrospective GST Cancellation Can’t Invalidate Genuine Transactions:  Jaipur Commissioner (Appeals) Quashes Rs. 95,670 ITC Demand. *   GST Pre-Deposit Non-Compliance: Allahabad High Court Allows Appeal  Subject to Rs. 30 Lakh Balance Deposit, Recognises Offline Filing. *  Documentary Nature of Evidence: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in Rs. 32.66 Crore Fake ITC Fraud Case *  Supreme Court Flags Systemic Bias in Army’s Permanent Commission Process for Women Officers *  Re-Determination of Land Compensation Can Be Based on Appellate Court Awards, Clarifies Scope of S. 28-A: Supreme Court. *  Supreme Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakh Costs On Rent Authority Officer For Acting Beyond Jurisdiction. *  DGGI Meerut | Court Denies Bail to Accused in Claiming Fake ITC And Export Refunds *  Denial of GST Rate Revision Benefit to Contractor Violates Article 14: Rajasthan HC *  GST Registration Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns: Gauhati High Court Directs Restoration on Compliance. *   Supreme Court Quashes FEMA Adjudication Orders, Revives Proceedings at  Show Cause Stage. *   Higher Rank, Harsher Punishment Justified: Supreme Court Restores Dismissal  of Bank Manager in Misappropriation Case. *   Limitation for Export Refund to Be Counted from Foreign Exchange Realisation,  Not From Export Invoices Issuance: CESTAT  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2599

Whether credit of ST paid on Brokerage for sale/purchase of shares & securities for Trading, Event management services available?

Case:-BANK OF BARODA LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE-II .

Citation:-2015 (37) S.T.R. 488 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief Facts:-
The applicants are seeking waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax of Rs. 4,88,93,874/- along with interest and various penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, on account of denial of Cenvat credit on certain input services.
The brief facts of the case are that applicant is a banking company engaged in providing banking and financial services to their clients. To provide their services the applicants are required to maintain CCR and SLR as per guide-lines prescribed by RBI. For this, the applicant is paying brokerage and sale of investment and also paying custodian charges to M/s. Stock Holding Corporation of India Ltd. No doubt on these charges the service provider is paying Service Tax and charging from the applicant. The applicant has taken Cenvat credit on the Service Tax paid on these services. Further, the applicant has availed Cenvat credit on event management charges paid by them to custodian for celebration of annual day function etc., they have also taken the Cenvat credit on the consortium charges paid to the lead bank i.e. SBI and also taken the Cenvat credit on maintenance charges for residential flat of Managing Director. The Revenue is of the view that all these services are not input service for providing output service by the applicant. Therefore, they are not entitled to take Cenvat credit on these input services. Accordingly, the show cause notices were issued and same was converted into impugned orders. Aggrieved from the said orders, the applicant is in appeals before Tribunal and seeking waiver of pre-deposit of the impugned demands.

Appellant contentions:- Shri S.S. Gupta ld. CA for the applicant submits that the brokerage paid on purchase, sale and investment and custodial charges of Stock Holding Corporate Ltd. are statutory expenses to be incurred by the applicant to do their banking business. Therefore, whatever charges they have paid, the Service Tax is also paid thereon. Therefore, they are entitled for Cenvat credit of Service Tax paid on these charges, as these charges are related to their business activity. It is further submitted that for event management charges also they are entitled to take Cenvat credit as these events are carried out by them to celebrate their anniversary wherein their clients, employees and other persons have participated. He further submits that Cenvat credit has been denied on service charges paid to the lead bank, on account of documents against which they have availed Cenvat credit against prescribed document under Rule 9(f) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. In this context, it is submitted that as per Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, the concession has been given to the banking and financial institution and as all the details required as per Rule 4A ibid are present, the applicant is entitled to take Cenvat credit. For maintenance charges for residential flat of Managing Director, the ld. Consultant submits that they have reversed the credit.

Respondent Contentions:- On the other hand, the ld. AR opposed the contention of the ld. CA and submits that the Cenvat credit taken by the applicants for three services mentioned hereinabove is not entitled to take Cenvat credit as these services are not directly related to their business activity. Therefore, the applicant be put to terms, at this stage.

Reasoning of Judgment:-The learned heard the parties and considered their submissions.
After hearing arguments advanced by the ld. Consultant, we are of the view that the services namely Brokerage for sale/purchase of shares & securities for Trading, Custodian charges, Event management services paid by them are in nature of input services having nexus to their business activity. Therefore, they are entitled to avail input service credit. We further find that as per Rule 4A of the Service Tax Rules, the required document that has been mentioned is the debit note issued by lead bank i.e. State Bank of India for Custodian charges and it contains all details. Therefore, applicants are entitled to take Cenvat credit on the said document. As the applicant had already reversed a sum of Rs. 44,620/-against the maintenance charges for residential flat of the Managing Director, therefore, the applicant has made out a case for complete waiver of pre-deposit. Accordingly, we waive the requirement of pre-deposit of Service Tax, interest and penalties and stay recovery thereof during the pendency of the appeal.

Decision:-  Stay granted.

Comment:-The crux of the case is that service tax paid for Brokerage for sale/purchase of shares & securities for Trading, Custodian charges, Event management services are in nature of input services having nexus to their business activity. Therefore, the assessee will be entitled to avail input service credit of the same.

Prepared By:Meet Jain
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com