Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2014-15/2361

Whether credit of services availed through intermediary deniable on the ground that invoice does not has mentions name of service recipient ?

Case:-ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD Vs COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, TRICHY
 
Citation:-2013-TIOL-1347-CESTAT-MAD
 
Brief facts:- Applicant is a manufacturer of cement and clinkers and they appointed an agent by name M/s. Excellent 2 Publicities for telecasting in TV channels their advertisements and Brand ‘Birla Cement' and ‘Birla Super'. M/s. Excellent 2 Publicities engaged the services of Jaya TV for getting timeslot for broadcasting advertisements. Jaya TV raised invoices on Excellent 2 Publicities showing charges for timeslots along with service tax paid. Excellent 2 Publicities raised invoices on the Applicant for the commission charged by them for the services rendered and service tax paid thereon and further asked for reimbursement of the cost for timeslots and the service tax paid by them on behalf of the applicants to Jaya TV. Applicant have taken service tax credit paid on the commission to Excellent 2 Properties as well as service tax paid by Jaya TV which was reimbursed to Jaya TV through intermediary i.e. Excellent 2 Publicities. Revenue was of the view that the applicant could not have taken credit on the service rendered by Jaya TV because there is no invoice issued by Jaya TV in the name of the applicant. Based on such reasoning, Revenue issued a Show Cause Notice for recovering credit taken during the period 26.7.05 to 3.5.06 and after adjudication, an amount of Rs.41,98,139/- is confirmed against the applicant. Aggrieved by this order, applicant has filed the appeal along with stay application before Tribunal requesting for waiver of pre-deposit of dues arising from the impugned order.
 
Appellant contentions :-The counsel for applicant submits that in the matter of advertisement, CBEC had clarified that the agent who canvasses timeslots would pay service tax only on the commission earned by them. In fact, initially, there was no service tax on the charges for timeslots. Subsequently, when service tax was imposed on the charges for timeslots, the Board clarified that the client in respect of timeslots was not the agency (who canvass timeslot) but the person who actually utilizes the timeslot. Consequent to this type of clarification, the practice was that the intermediary charged service tax only on the commission and the bill raised by the Jaya TV was supplied by the intermediary and reimbursed by the applicant. He submits that there is no doubt that this input service was utilized by the them which comes out clearly from the invoices raised by Jaya TV showing that the timeslots were for advertising their brand of "Birla Cement" and "Birla Super" and therefore the minor issue that invoices raised by Jaya TV is not showing the name of the applicant should not be a reason to deny credit having regard to proviso to Rule 9 (2) of Cenvat Credit Rules. He relies on the following decisions:-
 
a)   EUPEC-Welspun Coating India Ltd. Vs CCE Vadodara 2010 (19) STR 478 (Tri.-Ahmd.) = (2008-TIOL-2616-CESTAT-AHM)
 
b)   Valco Industries Ltd. Vs CCE Chandigarh 2012 (28) STR 457 (Tri.-Del.) = (2012-TIOL-1443-CESTAT-DEL)
 
c)    Pharmalab Process Equipments Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE Ahmd. 2009 (16) STR 94 (Tri.-Ahmd.) = (2009-TIOL-2215-CESTAT-AHM)
 
As a rejoinder, ld. counsel for applicant submits that bill was paid by the applicant and there is no question of somebody else taking credit because the bill cannot be paid again by some other factory of M/s Ultratech. He also submits that after the period May 2006, the problem has been resolved because now invoices are being issued by TV channels indicate client's name and address also and therefore this issue was of a temporary nature and there is no misuse of any Cenvat credit taken in this case.
 
Respondent contention :- Opposing the prayer, Ld. AR for Revenue submits that invoice issued by intermediary, M/s. Excellent 2 Publicities, is not one of specified documents under Rule 9(2) and M/s. Excellent 2 Publicities is not providing the service of broadcasting. M/s Excellent 2 Publicities has no authority to issue any invoices showing service tax paid on such services and therefore there is no question of taking any Cenvat credit based on invoices issued by the intermediary. In the case of credit based on invoices issued by Jaya TV, he submits that no credit can be taken since name of applicant is not shown on the invoices. He also submits that there is possibility that this credit may be taken by some other factory of the applicant. He relies on the decision of M/s Eagle Plastics Industries Ltd. Vs CCE Pune - 2004 (171) ELT 296 (SC).
 
Reasoning of judgment :-  Considered the arguments on both sides.  Bench was not in agreement with Revenue's argumentthat defect pointed out is fatal to eligibility of credit considering the overall facts andcircumstances of the case. Therefore, bench waived pre-deposit of dues arising from the impugnedorder for admission of appeal and there shall be stay of collection of such dues during pendencyof the appeal.
 
Decision:-Pre-deposit waived.

Comment:-The basic principle of allowing credit is that credit cannot be denied as far as the substantial conditions of receipt of service and its use in provision of output service/manufacturing activity is not doubted and there has been payment of tax of which credit is being taken. In the present case, it was prima facie concluded that merely because the services of broadcasting of advertisements were availed through intermediary person and the invoices issued by the broadcasting service provider did not contain the name of service recipient, credit could not be denied to the service recipient for such procedural lapse. 

Prepared by: Shubham Sancheti

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com