Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/CASE LAW/2015-16/2679

Whether credit deniable on the ground that process of cutting does not amounts to manufacture?

Case:-FOAM TECHNIQUES MFG. (I) PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EXCISE, THANE-I
 
Citation:-2015 (317) E.L.T. 266 (Tri. - Mumbai)

Brief facts:-This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. YDB(33)Th-I/2012, dated 16-3-2012. The relevant facts that arise for consideration are that the appellant herein is a Central Excise registered unit manufacturing inter alia P.U. foam sheets and also is availing the benefit of Cenvat credit. The appellant had procured blocks of P.U. foam and cut them into different sizes and shapes and sold the same on payment of duty. The lower authorities were of the view that the appellant’s activity does not amount to manufacture and availment of Cenvat credit on P.U. foam blocks was irregular. Show cause notice was issued for confirmation of demand with interest and also imposition of penalty. The appellant contested the issue on merits as well as on limitation. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand with interest and also imposed equivalent penalty. Aggrieved by such an order, an appeal was preferred. The first appellate authority, after following the due process of law, did not agree with the contentions of the appellant and rejected the appeal.
 
Appellant’s contention:- The learned Counsel would take us through the show cause notice as also both the orders. He would bring to our notice the products manufactured by the appellant though loosely termed by them as P.U. foam sheets, they were in fact various articles of P.U. foam. He would submit that the appellant had paid Central Excise duty on these articles, which is not disputed. He would submit that, having discharged the duty liability, availment of Cenvat credit on the P.U. foam blocks was correct. He would rely upon the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of CCE & C, Surat-III v. Creative Enterprises - 2009 (235)E.L.T.785 (Guj.),which has been upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as reported at 2009 (243) E.L.T. A120 (S.C.). He would also rely upon the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case of CCE, Pune-III v. Ajinkya Enterprises -2013 (294)E.L.T.203 (Bom.). His reliance on these two decisions is for the proposition that once the department has collected the duty from an assessee considering the product as manufactured, Cenvat credit cannot be denied on the inputs consumed for manufacture of the said final products.
 
Respondent’s contention:- The learned Departmental representative, on the other hand, would submit that there is no change in the description of the final product manufactured by the appellant. It is his submission that the appellant is only cutting the P.U. foam blocks and clearing the sheets, which is not the manufacturing activity. It is his submission that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Aman Marble Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Jaipur - 2003 (157)E.L.T.393 (S.C.), has categorically held that when cutting of marble blocks into slabs, no new product is coming into existence, hence not a manufacturing activity. He would also rely upon the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE, New Delhi-I v. S.R. Tissues Pvt. Ltd. - 2005 (186)E.L.T.385 (S.C.), for the same proposition.
 
Reasoning of judgement:- The only issue that arises for their consideration is whether the appellant is eligible to avail Cenvat credit of Central Excise duty paid on P.U. foam blocks which are inputs for their final product which is described by them as P.U. foam sheet.
From the perusal of the records, they find that the appellant is procuring P.U. foam blocks which are covered under Chapter Heading No. 3920 or 3921, on which Central Excise duty has been discharged by the manufacturer. They also note that the products as got manufactured by the appellant were classified by them under Chapter Heading No. 3926. After classifying the said product under Chapter Heading 3926, the appellant had discharged Central Excise duty which has been accepted by the Revenue. In the entire proceedings before them, they find that the classification described by the appellant as to the products which are falling under Chapter Heading 3926, remains the same and is not disturbed by the adjudicating authority or the first appellate authority. This itself is an indicator that the original input, P.U. foam block, has undergone change and is now other than the inputs which were procured by the appellant.
Yet another angle to the entire issue is when the appellant is discharging Central Excise duty on the products which they consider as manufactured products and the Revenue authorities also having accepted the Central Excise duty, in their considered view, the appellant eligible, rightfully to avail Cenvat credit of the Central Excise duty paid on the inputs. This is the settled law.
They find that the learned Counsel was correct in placing reliance on the decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in the case of Ajinkya Enterprises (supra). It is also noticed that the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Gujarat in the case of Creative Enterprises (supra) is directly on the issue and it was held in favour of the assessee inasmuch as the ratio stated is when an assessee considers the activity as amounting to manufacture, then the question of availing Cenvat credit cannot be denied by holding that there is no manufacture. This ratio has been upheld by the Apex Court as already indicated in this order.
As to the various case laws cited by the learned Departmental representative, they find that the judgments relied upon by the learned Counsel for the appellant in the case of Creative Enterprises and Ajinkya Enterprises (supra) are directly on the point and will have more persuasive value.
In view of the foregoing and the judicial pronouncements as also in the facts and circumstances of this case, they find that the impugned order is unsustainable and liable to be set aside and they do so.
The impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.
 
Decision:-Appeal allowed
 
Comment:- The analogy of the case is that as far as the excise duty has been paid on the process undertaken by the assessee and the same is not disputed by the revenue, then the cenvat credit on the inputs used in such processing cannot be denied on the contention that the process undertaken did not amount to manufacture. The payment of excise duty tantamounts to reversal of credit taken on inputs and cenvat credit cannot be denied on the ground that no excise duty was leviable.

Prepared by:- Monika Tak 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com