Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case law/2014-15/2264

Whether credit deniable on duty paid goods procured when ARO was issued by DGFT in favour of appellants?

Case:-OLEOFINE ORGANICS (INDIA) PVT.  LTD. v/s  COMMR. OF C. EX., THANE-I

Citation:-2014(299) E.L.T. 91(Tri. – Mumbai)

Brief facts:- The facts of the case are the appellants are holder of Advance License / Advance Authorization. They are clearing their final product in the domestic market as well as export. Under the Advance Licence/Advance Authorization Scheme, the appellants either imports the raw material or procures it from local manufacturers under Advance Release Order (ARO) or Invalidation letter issued by DGFT, against the said Licence/Authorization. Appellants have procured certain raw material from M/s. VVF Ltd. and M/s. Godrej Industries Ltd. Sometimes these are procured in the normal course i.e. without any export related scheme. When the goods are procured locally under ARO or Invalidation Letter, it is deemed export for the supplier. When the appellants are procuring the goods under ARO or Invalidation letter issued by DGFT, supplier of the goods are entitled to clear the goods without payment of Excise Duty, by following the procedure under Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001 as amended from time to time. For availing the benefit of said Notification, procedure is prescribed wherein the appellants had to initiate the process and based upon the process, supplier can clear the goods without payment of duty. Thus the procedure is a combined one involving appellants and suppliers. However, appellants and suppliers decided not to follow the procedure prescribed under the said Notification and instead paid the duty in spite of appellant transferring ARO/invalidation letter to suppliers. On receipt of the goods, appellants have taken the Cenvat credit of the duty paid by the suppliers. Impugned order demands the Cenvat credit so taken along with interest and penalty.
 
Appellant’s contentions:- The main contention of the ld. consultant to the appellants is that the appellants did not want or was not in a position to follow the procedure prescribed under Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001 and, therefore, suppliers have not availed the benefit of duty free clearance. It was further contended that appellants cannot be compelled to follow the procedure and once they have not followed the procedure, they are not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001. The duty has been paid by the suppliers of the raw material/input and they have availed the credit of the same. It is by now well established that duty paid by supplier cannot be denied as credit to the receiver of the goods. It was also the contention of the ld. Consultant that no action has been taken on the suppliers of the raw material. If duty was not payable, action should have been taken against them also. Ld. consultant also relied upon the Tribunal decision in the case of Shakun Polymers Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex. & Cus. Daman, reported in 2009 (241)E.L.T.250 (Tri.-Ahmd.)on the same issue.
 
Respondent’s contentions:-Revenue’s contention is that since the appellant along with suppliers were entitled to clear the goods duty free by following the procedure prescribed under Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001, the duty paid by the supplier has to be considered as deposit with Government and the appellants are not entitled to avail the credit of the same.
The ld. AR further argued that Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001 specifically covers the clearances against Advance Licence/Advance Authorization. There is no dispute that the appellants have surrendered their Advance License/Advance Authorization and obtained ARO/invalidation letter, these documents have been given to the supplier and have not been taken back or cancelled by the appellants. Therefore, the goods have been procured by them from the suppliers under the said ARO’s/invalidation letter. Under these circumstances they were obliged to follow procedure prescribed under Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001. Ld. AR further argued that appellants cannot follow the invalidation letter/ARO procedure partly (i.e. for Foreign Trade Policy purpose) and not follow the same for excise purpose. In view of this position no duty was payable by the supplier and they were not entitled to avail the Cenvat credit. Ld. AR further stated that supplies made by the suppliers are eligible for deemed credit benefit which involved refund of terminal excise duty. Further, suppliers have paid excise duty in order to shift the accumulated Cenvat credit to the appellants.
 
Reasoning of judgment:- The Hon’ble Tribunal have considered the submissions of the both the sides. There is no dispute that appellants had taken invalidation letter/ARO. These documents were handed over to the suppliers who in turn would have taken the benefit available to them. These have not been cancelled or withdrawn by the appellants. However, it is also observed from the impugned orders itself that the suppliers have not availed the refund of terminal excise duty. They also find from the documents submitted along with the appeal papers that the suppliers have in the relevant years paid very substantial duty from PLA and, therefore, the Revenue’s contention regarding shifting of credit does not hold water. They have asked the ld. AR to show any specific provisions under Central Excise law requiring the appellants to clear the goods in the said situation under Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001 only. They have also seen the Notification and the connected rules. These rules do not require the appellants to necessarily clear the goods duty free by following the procedure under Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001. They also note that overall there is no loss to the Revenue as the credit is being taken of the duty paid. If the appellants could have followed the Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 26-6-2001, no duty would have been paid by the suppliers and appellants would also have not got any credit. They also note that in the impugned order, Tribunal judgment in the case of M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. reported in 2009 (244)E.L.T.254 (Tri.-Ahd.)have been cited with lot of force. They have gone through the said judgment and they find that the issue involved in the said judgment was different and are not relevant to the facts of the present case. In fact, in the case of M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., duty was being paid by the supplier and no objection was raised by the Department. Objection raised was relating to valuation of supplies made. They also find the issue is exactly the same as decided by the Tribunal in the case of Shakun Polymers Ltd. v. CCE reported in 2009 (241)E.L.T.250 (Tri.-Ahd.). They do not find any reason not to follow the same. In view of the above, they allow both the appeals.
 
Decision:- Appeals allowed.

Comment:- The analogy of the case is that there is no embargo in procuring duty paid goods even if the assessee is eligible to procure duty free goods by following the procedure prescribed in notification 44/2001-C.E.(N.T.), dated 26-6-2001. The reason for the same is that when supplier has paid duty and no objection has been raised by the revenue department for payment of duty by supplier, then the credit cannot be denied to the assessee as there is no loss of revenue because the situation is revenue neutral.

Prepared by: Monika Tak
 

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com