Chartered Accountant
Bookmark and Share
click here to subscribe our newsletter
 
 
Corporate News *   CBIC issues draft rules for Customs valuation *  Top Headlines: Threshold for Benami deals, green bond investors, and more *  Govt aims 1-hour clearance for goods at all ports *  Exporters Allowed To Use RoDTEP, RoSCTL Scrips To Pay Customs Duty, Transfer Them; Rules Amended *  Millions of labourers to be affected by brick producers’ strike over hike in GST, coal rates *  Inauguration of ‘kendriya GST parisar’ *  Transporter can seek Release of Conveyance alone, not Goods under GST Act: Madras HC *  GST: Quoting of DIN Mandatory for Responding to Notice, Govt Modifies Portal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  CBIC issues modalities for filing transitional credit under GST. *  Mumbai: Man creates 36 fake GST firms, arrested for input tax credit fraud of Rs 23 cr *  Report to restructure Commerce Ministry under study; idea is to set up trade promotion body: Goyal *  Firms can soon file claims for GST credits of ?400 cr *  Gambling Alert! Govt May Levy Up To 28% GST; UP, Bengal Back Move *  EPFO backs raising retirement age to ease pressure on pension funds *  India Moving Up Power Scale, Set to Become Third Largest Economy By 2030 *  Airfares Get Expensive: What Changes for Flyers From Today? *  IRCTC Latest News: Passengers to Pay More For Cancelling Confirmed Rail Tickets Soon. *  IBC prevails over Customs Act, says Supreme Court. *  As GST enters sixth year, a time for evaluation and reassessment *  There’s GST on daily essentials as Centre needs money to buy MLAs: Arvind Kejriwal *  Now, GST on cancellation of confirmed train tickets, hotel bookings *  GST kitty for top States could rise 20% in FY23, says Crisil *  French customs officials seize another cargo vessel over Russia sanctions *  TradeLens builds on Asia momentum with Pakistan Customs deal *  Hike tax on tobacco, reduce affordability & increase revenue: Civil society organizations to GST council *  Bihar: ?10 crore tax evasion on tobacco products detected in raids *  Centre failed on GST, COVID; would it be anti-national? Rajan on Infosys row *  Service Tax not Chargeable on Income Tax TDS portion paid by recipient: CESTAT grants relief to TVS *  Foreign portfolio investors make net investment of Rs 7575cr in Sep so far
Subject News *  Run-up to Budget: Monetary threshold for GST offences may rise to Rs 25 cr *   GST (Tax) E-invoice Must For Businesses With Over Rs 5 Crore Annual Turnover *   Both Central GST and excise duty can be imposed on tobacco, rules Karnataka high court *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *   CBIC Issues Clarification On Extended Timelines For GST Compliance *  Budget 2023- 9.6 crore gas connections *  GST: Tamil Nadu Issues Instructions for Assessment and Adjudication Proceedings *  GST: CBIC Extends Last Date for filing of ITC *  GST collection in September surpasses Rs 1.4 lakh crore for straight seventh time *  Dollar smuggling case: Customs chargesheet names M Sivasankar as key conspirator. *  Hike in GST rates fuels inflation *  Assam: CBI arrests GST commissioner in Guwahati *  GST fraud worth ?824cr by 15 insurance Cos detected *  India proposes 15% customs duties on 22 items imported from UK *  Decriminalising certain offences under GST on cards *  Surge in GST collections more due to higher inflation: India Ratings *  MNRE Notifies BCD and Hike in GST Rates as ‘Change in Law’ Events But With a Condition | Mercom India *   Solar projects awarded before customs duty change allowed cost pass-through *  Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Levy Of GST On Royalty *   GST revenue in September likely at Rs 1.45 lakh crore *  Govt working on decriminalising certain offences under GST, lower compounding charge *  Building an institution like GST Council takes time, trashing is easy: Sitharaman *  GST collections in Sept may touch ?1.5 lakh crore *  KTR asks Centre to withdraw GST on handlooms *  After Gameskraft, More Online Gaming Startups To Receive GST Tax Claims *  Madras HC: AAR Application Filed Under VAT Does Not Survive After GST Enactment *  Threshold for criminal offences under GST law may be raised *  Bengaluru: Gaming company faces biggest GST notice of Rs 21,000 crore *  CBIC clarifies Classification of Cranes for GST, Customs Duty *  Customs seize gold hidden in bicycle in Kerala airport  

Comments

Print   |    |  Comment

PJ/Case Law/2016-17/3362

Whether credit be allowed on repair & maintenance service and erection & commissioning services availed by assessee for laying water pipeline outside factory?

Case:-ORIENT PAPER MILLS Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE & S.T., RAIPUR

Citation:-2016 (45) S.T.R. 178 (Tri. - Del.)

Brief facts: -
The appeal was against order dated 30-9-2015 of Commissioner (Appeals), Raipur. The appellants were engaged in the manufacture of paper liable to Central Excise duty. They were availing credit on inputs and input services. The present appeal dealt with the dispute regarding appellant’s eligibility for service tax credit of Rs. 4,90,316/- paid towards availing repair and maintenance service and erection and commissioning services with reference to water pipeline laid by the appellant to obtain water from Sharda OCM Plant situated away from the manufacturing facility of the appellant. The credits were denied on the ground that the services availed have no nexus to the manufacturing activity of the appellant and these are relating to pipelines situated outside the factory premises of the appellant.

Appellant’s contention:-Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that water was one of the main input item used in the manufacture of paper. The appellants laid pipeline to obtain water from Sharda OCM Plant, who had water storage facility at their abandoned mines. The services were availed by the appellants and for the purpose of input services, there was no necessity to avail the services inside the premises of the factory only. She relied on the decided case laws in support of the contention that the scope of Rule 2(l) is quite wide and cannot be restricted to the services received inside the factory only.

Respondent’s contention:-Ld. AR supported the findings of the lower authorities and submitted that the pipeline for transport of water had no direct link to paper manufactured and as such, the denial of credit is justified.

Reasoning of judgment:-Heard both the sides and examined the records.

The short point for decision was that eligibility of the appellant for service tax credit paid on the services availed with reference to the pipelines for transport of water to their factory. The “input services” as defined under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 states that any service used by a manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly in or in relation to the manufacture of final products is eligible for credit. The admitted fact was that the services received by the appellants in the present case were not falling under any exclusion clause. The Revenue disputed that the pipeline related services were not having any nexus with the manufacture of paper by the appellants. In this context, it was to be seen that for the appellant, water was one of the main input items used in the manufacture of paper. Admittedly, water was being transported from outside by a pipeline laid and maintained by the appellant. “Input Services” to be eligible for credit was not linked to any location for receipt of such services. The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in case of Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd. - 2013 (32)S.T.R. 532 (Bom.) examined the scope of “Inputs Services” and held as under :-
Now at the outset it must be noted that Rule 3(1) allows a manufacturer of final products to take credit inter alia of Service Tax which is paid on (i) any input or capital goods received in the factory of manufacturer of the final product; and (ii) any input service received by the manufacturer of the final product. The subordinate legislation in the present case makes a distinction between inputs or capital goods on the one hand and input services on the other. Clause (i) above provides that the Service Tax should be paid on any input or capital goods received in the factory of manufacture of the final product. Such a restriction, however, is not imposed in regard to input services since the only stipulation in clause (ii) is that the input services should be received by the manufacturer of the final product. Hence, even as a matter of first principle on a plain and literal construction of Rule 3(1) the Tribunal was not justified in holding that the appellant would not be entitled to avail of Cenvat credit in respect of services utilized in relation to ammonia storage tanks on the ground that they were situated outside the factory of production. The definition of the expression ‘input service’ covers any services used by the manufacturer, whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The words ‘directly or indirectly’ and ‘in or in relation to’ are words of width and amplitude. The subordinate legislation has advisedly used a broad and comprehensive expression while defining the expression ‘input service’. Rule 2(l) initially provides that input service means any services of the description falling in sub-clauses (i) and (ii). Rule 2(l) then provides an inclusive definition by enumerating certain specified services. Among those services are services pertaining to the procurement of inputs and inward transportation of inputs. The Tribunal, proceeded to interpret the inclusive part of the definition and held that the Legislature restricted the benefit of Cenvat credit for input services used in respect of inputs only to these two categories viz. for the procurement of inputs and for the inward transportation of inputs. This interpretation which has been placed by the Tribunal is ex facie contrary to the provisions contained in Rule 2(l). The first part of Rule 2(l) inter alia covers any services used by the manufacturer directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The inclusive part of the definition enumerates certain specified categories of services. However, it would be farfetched to interpret Rule 2(l) to mean that only two categories of services in relation to inputs viz. for the procurement of inputs and for the inward transportation of inputs were intended to be brought within the purview of Rule 2(l). Rule 2(l) must be read in its entirety. The Tribunal has placed an interpretation which runs contrary to the plain and literal meaning of the words used in Rule 2(l). Moreover as we have noted earlier, whereas Rule 3(1) allows a manufacturer of final products to take credit of excise duty and Service Tax among others paid on any input or capital goods received in the factory of manufacturer of the final product, insofar as any input service is concerned, the only stipulation is that it should be received by the manufacturer of the final product. This must be read with the broad and comprehensive meaning of the expression ‘input service’ in Rule 2(l).The input services in the present case were used by the appellant whether directly or indirectly, in or in relation to the manufacture of final products. The appellant, it is undisputed, manufactures dutiable final products and the storage and use of ammonia is an intrinsic part of that process.”
The Tribunal in Welspun Maxsteel Ltd.- 2013 (31)S.T.R. 64 (Tri.-Mum.) upheld the credit on security services received in connection with the pump house for pumping water from the outside situated factory premises. In case of ZF Steering Gear (India) Ltd.- 2015 (317)E.L.T. 580 (Tri.-Mum.), the Tribunal upheld the eligibility of credit of “input services” with reference to annual maintenance of wind mill installed outside the factory premises for generation of electricity.
Considering the above discussion and analysis, the Tribunal found no justification for denial of credit to the appellant and as such, set aside the impugned order. The appeal was allowed accordingly.
(Order dictated and pronounced in open Court)

Decision:-Appeal allowed.

Comment:-The gist of the case was that the assessee laidpipelines outside factory to procure water and availed repair and maintenance services and erection and commissioning services and claimed CENVAT credit on the same. The assessee was engaged in manufacturing paper which required a lot of water as input. Since, the aforesaid services were utilized in procurement of this input; it does not fall under any exclusion clause of ‘input service’ definition and was in perfect nexus with the final product manufactured. Further, the location of receipt of service was not relevant for allowing credit. Accordingly, denial of credit was not sustainable as per Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Prepared by:-Praniti Lalwani

Department News


Query

 
PRADEEP JAIN, F.C.A.

Head Office : -

Address :
"SUGYAN", H - 29, SHASTRI NAGAR, JODHPUR (RAJ.) - 342003

Phone No. :
0291 - 2439496, 0291 - 3258496

Mobile No. :
09314722236

Fax No. :0291 - 2439496


Branch Office : -

Address:
1008, 10th FLOOR, SUKH SAGAR COMPLEX,
NEAR FORTUNE LANDMARK HOTEL, USMANPURA,
ASHRAM ROAD, AHMEDABAD-380013

Phone No. :
079-32999496, 27560043

Mobile No. :
093777659496, 09377649496

E-mail :pradeep@capradeepjain.com